Flag Burning

[Great Nepal]

If some one wants to know about your nation they wont go to each person house to say what is your country like. they would see the flag and say that you are a communists. So see how much is flag identity of your country. And burning it is a act of terrorism.

I already told you that our flag says very little about our nation. And I already told you that violent people who attack flag-burners are far more likely to be terrorists. Stop repeating yourself and address those issues.

I have no issues cos I already addressed them.
Any way, Its your flag who has really nothing to do with your nation but majority has. And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

[Mutant Lobster People]

lobsters dont really care, or see the reason to get so angry over it.

[Fatatatutti]

And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

You think burning a piece of cloth is terrorism. I think killing people is more like terrorism. No, we certainly do not have the same vision of terrorism.

[Tungookska]

I wipe my nose on flags

[Nexus Corp]

Flag burning is good for business!
If you doubt it, watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkQ-mHJzNyY

[DeusII]

And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

You think burning a piece of cloth is terrorism. I think killing people is more like terrorism. No, we certainly do not have the same vision of terrorism.

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

[Santheres]

And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

You think burning a piece of cloth is terrorism. I think killing people is more like terrorism. No, we certainly do not have the same vision of terrorism.

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

Surely that's an overstatement. There are millions of flags and no single one of them is important to anything. The emperor, however, leads the country and there's only one of him.

[Omniplacet]

Burning a flag is a right of the people. Free-speech should be enlivened and reawakened in our world. There is no treason when done in protest against something morally objectionable.

[Joannalandia]

Joannalandians are only permitted to burn the flags of her enemies.

[Fatatatutti]

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

We don't recognize treason as a crime. Defiance against the state is part of the individual's right to freedom of expression. Only acts which hurt people are unacceptable.

And finally, killing an emperor is no different from killing anybody else.

[Sebally-Orwitskia]

Sebally-Orwistkinese understand the grave injustice brought on by flag burning and how it offends the heart, soul, and mind. It is the ten great crimes in our nation and we follow the Logoskria Tribe Punishments.

Minor Punishment(If lucky):
Would be stoning while stripped under a hot sun and will be splashed with ice cold water every thirteen minutes as well as follow the Chinese water torture before being released and, castrated(applicable to males only.), Women shall be sterilized as to never give birth at all. If they have children before the incident, children will be injected with toxins to create deformity in their bodies, thus never giving them a normal life again.

Major Punishment:

Will be sodomized in public by the most nauseating men and spitted on, whipped on, at the same time, all in front of the view of family and friends. Then they shall be engraved on their foreheads, the 'trean' scar, as to show their shame. All health services, be it public, or private will be denied to them, for if they suffer infection, they shall rot like the scum they are.

[DeusII]

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

We don't recognize treason as a crime. Defiance against the state is part of the individual's right to freedom of expression. Only acts which hurt people are unacceptable.

And finally, killing an emperor is no different from killing anybody else.

And that is where you differ from some many others in your anarchic state.

[Great Nepal]

And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

You think burning a piece of cloth is terrorism. I think killing people is more like terrorism. No, we certainly do not have the same vision of terrorism.

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

[/quote]
That is a overstatement, but I know what you mean. Burning a flag is same as killing a emperor.

[Fatatatutti]

We don't recognize treason as a crime. Defiance against the state is part of the individual's right to freedom of expression. Only acts which hurt people are unacceptable.
And finally, killing an emperor is no different from killing anybody else.

And that is where you differ from some many others in your anarchic state.

Thank you. It's an honour to differ from those who value flags above humans.

[DeusII]

We don't recognize treason as a crime. Defiance against the state is part of the individual's right to freedom of expression. Only acts which hurt people are unacceptable.
And finally, killing an emperor is no different from killing anybody else.

And that is where you differ from some many others in your anarchic state.

Thank you. It's an honour to differ from those who value flags above humans.

We value national heritage and honour above the rights to anarchy and violence, correct.

[Fatatatutti]

We value national heritage and honour above the rights to anarchy and violence, correct.

There is no honour in venerating a flag above freedom. I don't know what you're going on about a right to violence. I'm the one who's against violence, remember? Including violence toward flag-burners.

[First of Two]

But anarchies are violent.

[Fatatatutti]

But anarchies are violent.

Silly stereotype.

[Neo Israel]

But anarchies are violent.

Silly stereotype.

There are many silly stereotypes in this world. For myself, I would just as soon live in a nicely ordered state like this one.

[Satirius]

And I dont think we have same vision about terrorism.

You think burning a piece of cloth is terrorism. I think killing people is more like terrorism. No, we certainly do not have the same vision of terrorism.

Burning a flag is treason. If you were to burn a table cloth, no body would care. The flag represents the state and burning it is an act of defiance against it. It's as good as killing the emperor himself.

That is a overstatement, but I know what you mean. Burning a flag is same as killing a emperor.[/quote]

Requires much less effort tho. Zippo lighter+flag<sniper rifle+careful plan+vantage point+fanatic.

As for our nation, flag-burning is acceptable so long as it is carried out in a local foundry so that the fire it aided would be productive, or sent into a disassembly plant where the threads make other things. Burning the flag in the middle of the street is considered a minor offense as crimes go as it makes the flag unproductive (resources made in using it is not remade into better things), but is not met with more than a Riot Officer clearing the offender out with his baton and stamping out the fire on most occasions.

[Alachia]

Flag burning is highly illegal and punishable by death.

[First of Two]

But anarchies are violent.

Silly stereotype.

Silly, but true.

Or to put it more accurately, imaginary anarchies that exist only in the minds of anarchists may be non-violent.

However, all real examples of anarchies have been excruciatingly violent.

Therefore, anarchies do not pass the Missouri Test.*

*Because Missouri is the "show me" state, and you can't "show me" a functional nonviolent anarchy.

[Fatatatutti]

Or to put it more accurately, imaginary anarchies that exist only in the minds of anarchists may be non-violent.

However, all real examples of anarchies have been excruciatingly violent.

So, since Fatatatutti is decidedly non-violent, your logic indicates that we are not an anarchy.

[Santheres]

Or to put it more accurately, imaginary anarchies that exist only in the minds of anarchists may be non-violent.

However, all real examples of anarchies have been excruciatingly violent.

So, since Fatatatutti is decidedly non-violent, your logic indicates that we are not an anarchy.

It would seem that the fact that you have a government, however small and unobtrusive, should indicate the absence of anarchy in Fatatatutti.

[Satirius]

Or to put it more accurately, imaginary anarchies that exist only in the minds of anarchists may be non-violent.

However, all real examples of anarchies have been excruciatingly violent.

So, since Fatatatutti is decidedly non-violent, your logic indicates that we are not an anarchy.

It would seem that the fact that you have a government, however small and unobtrusive, should indicate the absence of anarchy in Fatatatutti.

De facto/quasi-anarchy?