Advertisement

by MERIZoC » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:33 am

by Roosevetania » Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:44 am

by Department of Elections » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:59 pm

by The Miaphysite Church of Coptic Archism » Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:59 am

by Roosevetania » Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:17 am
The Miaphysite Church of Coptic Archism wrote:Full disclosure in a public setting:
All Lukania is a puppet account of mine. Some weeks after I resigned from the senate on this account (this post), I was starting to get on top of the workload I was under and wanted to try getting back into the senate, but was scared to fully commit myself and disappoint people, so I did it under an alias and created a new cross-bench party to play with while I tested how active I could actually commit to being in the senate. Never did I intend to break any rules, and I never acted as more than one senator, but it's been made clear to me that this may be a foggier area than I realized, so rather than try to solve this cloak and dagger, I'm just making clear the situation.
EDIT: Assuming I didn't accidentally break the rules, to clarify, my intention is to retire the "All Lukania" account before doing anything with this account.

by Tectonix » Tue Jun 27, 2017 12:36 pm


by Maklohi Vai » Tue Jun 27, 2017 1:35 pm

by Department of Elections » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:29 pm
by Ainin » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:44 pm

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:45 pm
Department of Elections wrote:We've been informed and confirmed that the RGA issued a two-line whip on the non-partisan Constitutional Assembly election. We disapprove of this in the strongest of terms, but at this point suggest any parties having not done so issue their own whips, as the non-partisan element has already been defeated.

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:19 pm

by Department of Elections » Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:47 pm
House of Judah wrote:Actually, looking back and seeing that the post says that she confirmed the issuing of a whip, this wasn't just mistaken, this is a pretty bald-faced lie.

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:53 pm
Department of Elections wrote:House of Judah wrote:Actually, looking back and seeing that the post says that she confirmed the issuing of a whip, this wasn't just mistaken, this is a pretty bald-faced lie.
Members were messaged and said it was "strongly suggested." The RGA Constitution defines a two-line whip as a strong suggestion. Period.
The Admins might tolerate your behavior, but I don't. Your privilege of participating in any DoE-run activities is revoked and Moderators will be contacted if you post in any of our threads.
There is a vote for the constitutional assembly. Your are all strongly encouraged to vote to ensure that the recommendation of the assembly represents our values.
Please rank Tectonix House of Judah and Socialist Nordia as your top three choices.

by New World Oceania » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:00 pm
House of Judah wrote:snip

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:01 pm

by Tumbra » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:06 pm

by Lykens » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:07 pm

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:17 pm

by New World Oceania » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:20 pm
House of Judah wrote:Begging the pardons of the chillers, but I'm not the one who's spouting lies and now is attempting to leverage the constituency claiming thread and an election thread to silence someone.

by Lykens » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:23 pm

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:26 pm

by New World Oceania » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:28 pm
House of Judah wrote:New World Oceania wrote:Have you tried thinking about it dialectically
I'm sorry, but what logic do you want me to apply? You already said you "confirmed" something that wasn't true, which means you were lying. I called you out for it and you decided that the best way to deal with that was to try to shut me out of staple things for the RP. So what logic do you want me to apply? That you'll deign to let me back if I only would stop pointing out the immoral or even evil acts that you have performed?

by House of Judah » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:37 pm
New World Oceania wrote:House of Judah wrote:I'm sorry, but what logic do you want me to apply? You already said you "confirmed" something that wasn't true, which means you were lying. I called you out for it and you decided that the best way to deal with that was to try to shut me out of staple things for the RP. So what logic do you want me to apply? That you'll deign to let me back if I only would stop pointing out the immoral or even evil acts that you have performed?
I have thicc skin but this crosses the line

by Lykens » Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:40 pm
House of Judah wrote:New World Oceania wrote:I have thicc skin but this crosses the line
And this is my main issue with you. You did something objectively evil, targeted a child, and you have never owned that fact. You've never shown any remorse for it. You've behaved as though what you did was perfectly acceptable.
You have thick skin? Tell that to Kam's nephew.
Kam's an ass. Everyone know's that Kam's an ass. Everyone knows that he gets his kicks from trolling people, and if you happen to be from a particularly vulnerable community like transgenders, so much the better. He deserved to get smacked around. His nephew did not. That's why you were banned from the IRC. Because you crossed the line in a hugely unacceptable way.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement