Advertisement

by DrWinner » Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:22 am

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:17 pm

by FreYhill » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:21 pm

by DrWinner » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:33 pm

by Nariterrr » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:58 pm

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Tue Sep 13, 2016 3:57 pm
DrWinner wrote:Mark rises again.
"Mr. Speaker, I'd like to firmly state that if this state is producing any surplus, it should all be devoted to clearing the debt, not building temporary monuments to permanent memories of people. History serves to preserve their memories, and once this state is out of debt, history can be put into memorials. History will remain, but our debt must not."
Mark sits again.

by The New World Oceania » Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:09 pm

by DrWinner » Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:14 pm
United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:DrWinner wrote:Mark rises again.
"Mr. Speaker, I'd like to firmly state that if this state is producing any surplus, it should all be devoted to clearing the debt, not building temporary monuments to permanent memories of people. History serves to preserve their memories, and once this state is out of debt, history can be put into memorials. History will remain, but our debt must not."
Mark sits again.
"Mister Speaker, I urge you in the utmost manner to remind my colleague that all funds for memorials would be provided by the Ministry of Social Development's budget, not taken from the surplus. Furthermore, Mr, Speaker, I would question why a businessman that claims to have economic knowledge such as my colleague is unaware of the fact that the government budget has produced a surplus. I also rise to this occasion to condemn in the utmost regard the disregard my colleague has for memorials to honour those who have been martyred for the values Elizia holds so dear– justice, democracy, liberty, equality, sovereignty, and other values essential to any sovereign democratic republic–and I urge my colleague to reconsider his stance on memorials. What will our posterity say if we have an opportunity to honour the 75,000 murdered by the ENC regime in the early 1970s, but turn in down on the basis of saving a surplus that would have never even been impacted in the first places? What will our posterity say if we reject the opportunity to honour the recently-martyred Sa Ri An and others martyred by the opponents of the religious freedom and equality she fought so hard for her entire life? What will our posterity say if we do not honour those martyred during the Orchid Revolution? There are things greater, and indeed things millions have died for, such as democracy, liberty, freedom, equality, and sovereignty, than simply reducing our debt a few weeks earlier than expected. Mr. Speaker, my colleague would be wise to remember that."

by Hindia Belanda » Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:39 pm
Nederlands-Indië - Hindia BelandaIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
Overview - Guide to Hindia Belanda - Embassy Program - Fly with our imaginary airline - New Roepiah banknotes - Mobile App - IIWiki - NEWSIoannis Papakonstantinou, Senator (independent)

by The Sarian » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:54 pm
Nariterrr wrote:"Mr. Speaker I am not against this bill, but I will say having it be a government bill is uncalled for. While memorializing the dead is important, especially those who committed themselves to our cause, but we have better things to consider. Mainly, bills from the opposition that will actually benefit the course of our nation, such as The Hon [Freyhill]'s bill and my Warrants and Subpoenas Acts. While I will be voting for this bill, I advise the government to give government bill status to bills that actually have government importance. The opposition is tired of having our bills deliberately pushed back in favor of such bills."
by Tumbra » Wed Sep 14, 2016 3:45 am
Order Paper
All times stated are tentatively 1830 UTC + 8 (Elizian Timezone) unless stated.
Sunday to Monday - Constitutional Amendment (Parliamentary Procedure) Act (Rt. Hon Tijah Dian)
Monday to Tuesday - National Railway Network Act (Rt. Hon Huang Diem)
Tuesday to Wednesday - National Memorial Commission (Establishment) Act (Rt. Hon Jiang Muhammad)
Wednesday to Thursday - Oral Questions to the President
Thursday to Friday - Criminal Code (Narcotics Trade) Amendment Act (Rt. Hon John Chiu)
Friday to Saturday - National Railway Network Act (Rt. Hon Huang Diem)
Saturday to Sunday - Voting on proposed bIlls
Liberal Coalition - 10 Questions
ENC - 4 Questions
Alternative - 2 Questions
National Coalition - 3 Questions from backbenchers

by Kamchastkia » Wed Sep 14, 2016 7:58 am

by Argentarino » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:14 am
by Tumbra » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:20 am
Argentarino wrote:Sayid Kasturi, who was visibly tired, entered the chamber with a simple piece of paper. He passed his colleagues in the Opposition front benches and went straight to the Speaker and passed him the note, simply uttering, "My resignation, effective at the end of the day, Mr. Speaker. May I address the Senate, Mr. Speaker? I understand that it is President's Questions, and I do not wish to take up someone's time, but if you'll allow me to issue a statement before I resign, I would be most grateful."

by Argentarino » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:48 am

by Lykens » Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:11 am

by The Sarian » Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:22 am

by DrWinner » Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:28 am

by The Sarian » Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:44 am
DrWinner wrote:"It is a time to ask the president questions." Mark states. "There is yet to be created legislation to limit what questions can and cannot be asked."

by The Licentian Isles » Wed Sep 14, 2016 11:56 am
Lykens wrote:Tijah embraced his Chief Whip and turned to address the chamber.
"Mister Speaker, I would like to ask the president a simple question that should be sufficiently answered with a yes or a no. I hope it isn't too much to ask for.
Mister Speaker, was the president or the couple of Home Secretaries we've had aware of the deplorable treatment of our honorable colleague the Shadow Foreign Secretary or that of his son?"

by Argentarino » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:08 pm
The Licentian Isles wrote:Lykens wrote:Tijah embraced his Chief Whip and turned to address the chamber.
"Mister Speaker, I would like to ask the president a simple question that should be sufficiently answered with a yes or a no. I hope it isn't too much to ask for.
Mister Speaker, was the president or the couple of Home Secretaries we've had aware of the deplorable treatment of our honorable colleague the Shadow Foreign Secretary or that of his son?"
"Mr Speaker, as one of the Home Secretaries that the Leader of the Opposition appears to be referring to, I can say that I was not aware of these allegations. I would be interested to hear more on this from the honourable gentleman at another time, if that would be acceptable to him."


by The Licentian Isles » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:13 pm
Argentarino wrote:The Licentian Isles wrote:
"Mr Speaker, as one of the Home Secretaries that the Leader of the Opposition appears to be referring to, I can say that I was not aware of these allegations. I would be interested to hear more on this from the honourable gentleman at another time, if that would be acceptable to him."
"Mr. Speaker, if I may respond?" After waiting for approval, Sayid spoke up. "I had not seen my son in days. When he called me, saying he was in Kentang, I was relieved. I told him to come home and have dinner with his mother and I. As we had begun to eat, the police barged into our apartment, demanding we get on the ground. None of us resisted, and when I asked for the warrants to be presented to us, my son and I were arrested. An officer pulled out two warrants, but we were not allowed to review them to ensure their validity. I was questioned without a lawyer present, and despite my repeated demands for one to be presented me, I was denied. Only until I was allowed a phone call did I speak to a lawyer, and even then, they were not allowed to see us before attainment. As my lawyers can attest, my son in the meantime underwent water boarding, and was questioned without an attorney present. He may be a murderer as is claimed of him, but everyone is entitled to constitutional protections. For if one of us is denied these protections, Mr. Speaker, then any of us can be denied them."

by Skyviolia » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:19 pm
The Sarian wrote:"Again made under the cloak of Parliamentary Privilege"
by Ainin » Wed Sep 14, 2016 12:36 pm
The Licentian Isles wrote:Argentarino wrote:
"Mr. Speaker, if I may respond?" After waiting for approval, Sayid spoke up. "I had not seen my son in days. When he called me, saying he was in Kentang, I was relieved. I told him to come home and have dinner with his mother and I. As we had begun to eat, the police barged into our apartment, demanding we get on the ground. None of us resisted, and when I asked for the warrants to be presented to us, my son and I were arrested. An officer pulled out two warrants, but we were not allowed to review them to ensure their validity. I was questioned without a lawyer present, and despite my repeated demands for one to be presented me, I was denied. Only until I was allowed a phone call did I speak to a lawyer, and even then, they were not allowed to see us before attainment. As my lawyers can attest, my son in the meantime underwent water boarding, and was questioned without an attorney present. He may be a murderer as is claimed of him, but everyone is entitled to constitutional protections. For if one of us is denied these protections, Mr. Speaker, then any of us can be denied them."
"Mr Speaker, while I am reticent to respond as it is still President's Questions, I am disturbed by the allegations presented by the honourable gentleman, and would like to thank him for making me aware of them." Sitting down in an attempt to avoid creating more of a disturbance during question time, Chu made a mental note to contact Kasturi later, and also to contact the Head of the Capital Police Force. It sounded like things were, once again, not as he hoped in Elizia.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement