NATION

PASSWORD

[NSG Senate] Senate Chamber: Do We Have Work?

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:37 pm

Throughout the debate, the SLP Senator decides he will chain smoke until disciplined. He takes out a packet of Benson and Hedges Gold, lights it and starts smoking.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:40 pm

Thu Tran, SLP Senator, leaves the Chamber for 20 minutes, to go to the local shop and buy an e-cigarette. She places it on her desk as protest.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:11 pm

The SLP Senator winked at Thu as she left and finish one cigarrete. The cigarrete is burnt out by placing the end on the seat in front. Then the Senator took two cigarettes out, lighted both and started smoking them at the same time.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
The Licentian Isles
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Jul 22, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Licentian Isles » Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:13 pm

Chu Canh Kim coughs, and gets his inhaler out of his pocket. How much more obnoxious can these SLP bastards get ??, he thinks as he uses the inhaler.
Last edited by The Licentian Isles on Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tumbra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1296
Founded: Aug 29, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tumbra » Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:02 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:Throughout the debate, the SLP Senator decides he will chain smoke until disciplined. He takes out a packet of Benson and Hedges Gold, lights it and starts smoking.


"Order, order. I understand the Hon. Member's concerns about the bill, but that is no reason to begin smoking in the Chamber till kingdom come. And especially seeing how some Hon. Members have breathing difficulties already...Stop it."
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF TUMBRA
Tumbra - a sprawling, modern federal democratic republic located in Esportiva. Strong economy, strong civil rights, strong freedoms.
Population: 121 million | TLA: TMB | Capital City: Straton | Largest City: Couno
Constitution | Domestic News | Domestic Football | Domestic Motorsports | Wiki Article
President: Edward Merryweather (Liberal) | Prime Minister: Stephen Williams (Liberal)
U-18 World Cup 13 Champions/Di Bradini Cup 51 Champions

User avatar
Tumbra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1296
Founded: Aug 29, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tumbra » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:45 am

"We have reached the end of the legislative queue. Hon. Members are free to discuss issues of the day, or eat, or ask questions of other Senators, and generally do whatever you want except exploding in the Chamber..."

Richard looks at the heavy cloud of smoke over the SLP benches and the Hon. Chu Canh Kim still coughing.

"...and smoking."
Last edited by Tumbra on Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF TUMBRA
Tumbra - a sprawling, modern federal democratic republic located in Esportiva. Strong economy, strong civil rights, strong freedoms.
Population: 121 million | TLA: TMB | Capital City: Straton | Largest City: Couno
Constitution | Domestic News | Domestic Football | Domestic Motorsports | Wiki Article
President: Edward Merryweather (Liberal) | Prime Minister: Stephen Williams (Liberal)
U-18 World Cup 13 Champions/Di Bradini Cup 51 Champions

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:57 am

Thu Tran kept the e-cigarette on her desk as a protest on the e-cigarette ban. E-cigarettes provided people a more healthy alternative to normal cigarettes, and they would help people addicted to normal cigarettes give up smoking without withdrawal symptoms. And there was no point in criminalising flavoured cigarettes, either; she'd made sure the e-cigarette she brought was strawberry flavoured.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:03 am

Tumbra wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Throughout the debate, the SLP Senator decides he will chain smoke until disciplined. He takes out a packet of Benson and Hedges Gold, lights it and starts smoking.


"Order, order. I understand the Hon. Member's concerns about the bill, but that is no reason to begin smoking in the Chamber till kingdom come. And especially seeing how some Hon. Members have breathing difficulties already...Stop it."

"I shall refrain from continuing with my action, Mr Speaker" the Senator said, burning out the current cigarette he was smoking.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
The Licentian Isles
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Jul 22, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Licentian Isles » Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:58 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Tumbra wrote:
"Order, order. I understand the Hon. Member's concerns about the bill, but that is no reason to begin smoking in the Chamber till kingdom come. And especially seeing how some Hon. Members have breathing difficulties already...Stop it."

"I shall refrain from continuing with my action, Mr Speaker" the Senator said, burning out the current cigarette he was smoking.


"Thank you Senator." Kim stated, with a hint of sarcasm in his voice.

User avatar
West Verrica
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 470
Founded: Feb 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby West Verrica » Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:54 am

post removed.
Last edited by West Verrica on Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Subjectivity is Truth"

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:49 am

Arachaea wrote:The retail of electronic cigarettes in Elizia is unlawful without a prescription from an accredited medical doctor. Only pharmacies shall retail electronic cigarettes.

"The purpose of an electronic cigarette is to pry people off of a tobacco addiction. When electronic cigarettes are easily obtainable, it is well-documented that they have had the effect of increasing youth experimentation with nicotine products, who otherwise would not have done so. This regulation would restrict e-cigarettes to people that actually have a legitimate medical purpose in obtaining such a device, and not to people that wish to use it recreationally."

"Although I don't see that happening much, as the jury remains out on the effectiveness of e-cigarettes in the first place."

The use of flavouring to alter cigarettes or cigars in order to increase consumption, such as menthol, fruits, candies and herbs, is prohibited. The cabinet of Elizia shall have final determination of what constitutes flavouring."

"I fail to see how that is remotely authoritarian. Flavouring tobacco has he sole purpose of making it more attractive for youth, as a single look at the industry's marketing of such products will tell you. Such products are banned or otherwise restricted in many countries for that reason, and it is an effective measure to decrease interest in tobacco."

Wolfmanne2 wrote:The SLP Senator winked at Thu as she left and finish one cigarrete. The cigarrete is burnt out by placing the end on the seat in front. Then the Senator took two cigarettes out, lighted both and started smoking them at the same time.

hi pruss
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:00 am

"While I do support the idea behind this bill, the bill simply mentions that, presumably, the consumption of tobacco products by those under 18 years of age is unlawful but doesn't explain the punishment for doing so. Is the punishment decided on the judges discretion, or is it treated as a case to case matter?

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:02 am

Western Pacific Territories wrote:"While I do support the idea behind this bill, the bill simply mentions that, presumably, the consumption of tobacco products by those under 18 years of age is unlawful but doesn't explain the punishment for doing so. Is the punishment decided on the judges discretion, or is it treated as a case to case matter?

"Please refer to sub-sections 4d and 4e. Underage smoking is a civil wrong."
Last edited by Ainin on Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 11:50 am

Ainin wrote:
Arachaea wrote:The retail of electronic cigarettes in Elizia is unlawful without a prescription from an accredited medical doctor. Only pharmacies shall retail electronic cigarettes.

"The purpose of an electronic cigarette is to pry people off of a tobacco addiction. When electronic cigarettes are easily obtainable, it is well-documented that they have had the effect of increasing youth experimentation with nicotine products, who otherwise would not have done so. This regulation would restrict e-cigarettes to people that actually have a legitimate medical purpose in obtaining such a device, and not to people that wish to use it recreationally."

"Although I don't see that happening much, as the jury remains out on the effectiveness of e-cigarettes in the first place."

The use of flavouring to alter cigarettes or cigars in order to increase consumption, such as menthol, fruits, candies and herbs, is prohibited. The cabinet of Elizia shall have final determination of what constitutes flavouring."

"I fail to see how that is remotely authoritarian. Flavouring tobacco has he sole purpose of making it more attractive for youth, as a single look at the industry's marketing of such products will tell you. Such products are banned or otherwise restricted in many countries for that reason, and it is an effective measure to decrease interest in tobacco."

Wolfmanne2 wrote:The SLP Senator winked at Thu as she left and finish one cigarrete. The cigarrete is burnt out by placing the end on the seat in front. Then the Senator took two cigarettes out, lighted both and started smoking them at the same time.

hi pruss

Thu Tran held up the e-cigarette she had on her desk, and stated "There are only a few people who need e-cigarettes for medical uses. I think that the government should make sure that those people get them, and then the leftover e-cigarettes can be sold. E-cigarettes are still addictive, but they don't pose a health risk and thus there is no point in banning them. And in the topic of flavoured cigarettes, I don't think under-eighteens should be able to buy flavoured ones, as flavoured cigarettes should be held to the same standards as all other cigarettes, and I agree with the bill apart from those two passages." She then put her strawberry e-cigarette down on the desk.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:19 pm

"No one sells oxycodone over-the-counter because of its addictive properties and harmful health effects. E-cigarettes still contain large quantities of highly-addictive nicotine and various carcinogens. Why should they not be held to the same standard as OxyContin?"

"Anyone seeking to stop smoking would be able to obtain a prescription for an e-cigarette from a medical professional, if they deem it necessary. The public over-the-counter sale of e-cigarettes, again, has the counterproductive result of being employed by previous non-smokers to experiment with nicotine. This provision would maintain access to e-cigs for people using them to kick their addiction, while preventing abuse. It's only common sense to restrict access to harmful goods."

"And I cannot support any revision to the flavouring provision. It must be prohibited outright because its only purpose is to attract youth to tobacco."
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:47 pm

Ainin wrote:"No one sells oxycodone over-the-counter because of its addictive properties and harmful health effects. E-cigarettes still contain large quantities of highly-addictive nicotine and various carcinogens. Why should they not be held to the same standard as OxyContin?"

"Anyone seeking to stop smoking would be able to obtain a prescription for an e-cigarette from a medical professional, if they deem it necessary. The public over-the-counter sale of e-cigarettes, again, has the counterproductive result of being employed by previous non-smokers to experiment with nicotine. This provision would maintain access to e-cigs for people using them to kick their addiction, while preventing abuse. It's only common sense to restrict access to harmful goods."

"And I cannot support any revision to the flavouring provision. It must be prohibited outright because its only purpose is to attract youth to tobacco."

"I know quite a few people who've started e-cigarettes and nothing bad has happened to their physical health due to it. And yes, it's addictive but coffee is addictive too and I don't see you going round trying to ban coffee now, do I? And I think that e-cigarettes should be reserved for those who deem them necessary to stop their smoking addiction. And if flavoured cigarettes are only to attract youth to tobacco, why do I hear stories of people who smoke cigarettes switching to flavoured e-cigarettes to stop their addiction? And the non-electronic flavoured cigarettes are also chosen by people already addicted to cigarettes out of a matter for personal preference, and by banning them, you are removing these people's right to follow their personal preference." Thu Tran stated, before leaving the chamber to buy more e-cigarettes to put on her desk as protest. She came back with a mint-flavoured one, a peach-flavoured one and a chocolate-flavoured one.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:56 pm

Arachaea wrote:
Ainin wrote:"No one sells oxycodone over-the-counter because of its addictive properties and harmful health effects. E-cigarettes still contain large quantities of highly-addictive nicotine and various carcinogens. Why should they not be held to the same standard as OxyContin?"

"Anyone seeking to stop smoking would be able to obtain a prescription for an e-cigarette from a medical professional, if they deem it necessary. The public over-the-counter sale of e-cigarettes, again, has the counterproductive result of being employed by previous non-smokers to experiment with nicotine. This provision would maintain access to e-cigs for people using them to kick their addiction, while preventing abuse. It's only common sense to restrict access to harmful goods."

"And I cannot support any revision to the flavouring provision. It must be prohibited outright because its only purpose is to attract youth to tobacco."

"I know quite a few people who've started e-cigarettes and nothing bad has happened to their physical health due to it. And yes, it's addictive but coffee is addictive too and I don't see you going round trying to ban coffee now, do I? And I think that e-cigarettes should be reserved for those who deem them necessary to stop their smoking addiction. And if flavoured cigarettes are only to attract youth to tobacco, why do I hear stories of people who smoke cigarettes switching to flavoured e-cigarettes to stop their addiction? And the non-electronic flavoured cigarettes are also chosen by people already addicted to cigarettes out of a matter for personal preference, and by banning them, you are removing these people's right to follow their personal preference." Thu Tran stated, before leaving the chamber to buy more e-cigarettes to put on her desk as protest. She came back with a mint-flavoured one, a peach-flavoured one and a chocolate-flavoured one.

"Mister Speaker, anecdotal evidence, and not even well-told anecdotes at that, does not pass muster for a warrant in this chamber, at least not by my standards. If the member would like to produce real evidence, that would be appreciated."
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:09 pm

Maklohi Vai wrote:
Arachaea wrote:"I know quite a few people who've started e-cigarettes and nothing bad has happened to their physical health due to it. And yes, it's addictive but coffee is addictive too and I don't see you going round trying to ban coffee now, do I? And I think that e-cigarettes should be reserved for those who deem them necessary to stop their smoking addiction. And if flavoured cigarettes are only to attract youth to tobacco, why do I hear stories of people who smoke cigarettes switching to flavoured e-cigarettes to stop their addiction? And the non-electronic flavoured cigarettes are also chosen by people already addicted to cigarettes out of a matter for personal preference, and by banning them, you are removing these people's right to follow their personal preference." Thu Tran stated, before leaving the chamber to buy more e-cigarettes to put on her desk as protest. She came back with a mint-flavoured one, a peach-flavoured one and a chocolate-flavoured one.

"Mister Speaker, anecdotal evidence, and not even well-told anecdotes at that, does not pass muster for a warrant in this chamber, at least not by my standards. If the member would like to produce real evidence, that would be appreciated."

"How about this: E-cigarettes were designed for the purpose of a safe alternative to smoking; and I can think of no reason why someone would create something to supposedly do that yet no do that. Surely they should be legal, if government provisions are made so that people who need them can easily get them." Thu Tran stated, before lining up her four flavoured e-cigarettes.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
The Licentian Isles
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Jul 22, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Licentian Isles » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:37 pm

Arachaea wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:"Mister Speaker, anecdotal evidence, and not even well-told anecdotes at that, does not pass muster for a warrant in this chamber, at least not by my standards. If the member would like to produce real evidence, that would be appreciated."

"How about this: E-cigarettes were designed for the purpose of a safe alternative to smoking; and I can think of no reason why someone would create something to supposedly do that yet no do that. Surely they should be legal, if government provisions are made so that people who need them can easily get them." Thu Tran stated, before lining up her four flavoured e-cigarettes.


"Many people don't follow through on their promises; it's a comment regularly aimed at our profession, for example. The member would do well to follow my colleague's advice and present some real evidence to support his view."

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:54 pm

The Licentian Isles wrote:
Arachaea wrote:"How about this: E-cigarettes were designed for the purpose of a safe alternative to smoking; and I can think of no reason why someone would create something to supposedly do that yet no do that. Surely they should be legal, if government provisions are made so that people who need them can easily get them." Thu Tran stated, before lining up her four flavoured e-cigarettes.


"Many people don't follow through on their promises; it's a comment regularly aimed at our profession, for example. The member would do well to follow my colleague's advice and present some real evidence to support his view."

"This paper from the UK Government shows that e-cigarettes are a much safer alternative to cigarettes, and that they are effective in stopping cigarette usage. While it does state in the paper that the government is looking for a way to regulate it so that it doesn't offer a gateway into cigarettes, I think that the regulation of cigarettes themselves and not e-cigarettes would be sufficient in this case, and the sale of e-cigarettes should be allowed so long as the person in question shows identification, and that e-cigarettes are given to those who need them by the government." Thu Tran stated.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
The Licentian Isles
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Jul 22, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Licentian Isles » Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:14 pm

Arachaea wrote:
The Licentian Isles wrote:
"Many people don't follow through on their promises; it's a comment regularly aimed at our profession, for example. The member would do well to follow my colleague's advice and present some real evidence to support his view."

"This paper from the UK Government shows that e-cigarettes are a much safer alternative to cigarettes, and that they are effective in stopping cigarette usage. While it does state in the paper that the government is looking for a way to regulate it so that it doesn't offer a gateway into cigarettes, I think that the regulation of cigarettes themselves and not e-cigarettes would be sufficient in this case, and the sale of e-cigarettes should be allowed so long as the person in question shows identification, and that e-cigarettes are given to those who need them by the government." Thu Tran stated.


"Even you accept that these products can be a gateway into more regular tobacco use, and that they should be regulated. That's what the member's bill does."

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:48 pm

The Licentian Isles wrote:
Arachaea wrote:"This paper from the UK Government shows that e-cigarettes are a much safer alternative to cigarettes, and that they are effective in stopping cigarette usage. While it does state in the paper that the government is looking for a way to regulate it so that it doesn't offer a gateway into cigarettes, I think that the regulation of cigarettes themselves and not e-cigarettes would be sufficient in this case, and the sale of e-cigarettes should be allowed so long as the person in question shows identification, and that e-cigarettes are given to those who need them by the government." Thu Tran stated.


"Even you accept that these products can be a gateway into more regular tobacco use, and that they should be regulated. That's what the member's bill does."

"I'm calling for slight regulation, yes, to make sure those who need them get them. I believe the act's measures of dealing with cigarettes are enough to deter people from starting, without banning the recreational use of e-cigarettes and flavourings." Thu Tran explained.
The Principality of Arachaea

User avatar
The Licentian Isles
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Jul 22, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Licentian Isles » Wed Aug 10, 2016 3:06 pm

Arachaea wrote:
The Licentian Isles wrote:
"Even you accept that these products can be a gateway into more regular tobacco use, and that they should be regulated. That's what the member's bill does."

"I'm calling for slight regulation, yes, to make sure those who need them get them. I believe the act's measures of dealing with cigarettes are enough to deter people from starting, without banning the recreational use of e-cigarettes and flavourings." Thu Tran explained.


"We'll have to agree to disagree then."

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:53 am

Arachaea wrote:"I know quite a few people who've started e-cigarettes and nothing bad has happened to their physical health due to it.

"I know quite a few people that have jaywalked and not been hit by cars. Your personal observations are, for one, irrelevant, and for two, inconsistent with the emerging scientific consensus that vaping fluids still contain unacceptably large quantities of carcinogens and other harmful substances."

And yes, it's addictive but coffee is addictive too and I don't see you going round trying to ban coffee now, do I?

"Your analogy would make sense if caffeine created a physical addiction comparable in scale and harm to heroin and cocaine. Nicotine is widely-recognised as a highly addictive drug with the potential of harming mental development in teenagers and increasing the spread of cancer. We restrict access to oxycodone to prevent its abuse by those that have no legitimate reason to use it. So, I ask again, why should nicotine, a comparably addictive and harmful drug, not be held to the same standard?"

And I think that e-cigarettes should be reserved for those who deem them necessary to stop their smoking addiction.

"That is quite literally the opposite of what you've been arguing so far. You have been arguing for their unrestricted commercial sale."

And if flavoured cigarettes are only to attract youth to tobacco, why do I hear stories of people who smoke cigarettes switching to flavoured e-cigarettes to stop their addiction? And the non-electronic flavoured cigarettes are also chosen by people already addicted to cigarettes out of a matter for personal preference, and by banning them, you are removing these people's right to follow their personal preference." Thu Tran stated, before leaving the chamber to buy more e-cigarettes to put on her desk as protest. She came back with a mint-flavoured one, a peach-flavoured one and a chocolate-flavoured one.

"I'm not sure where you got the idea that this bill bans the flavouring of electronic cigarettes' vaping fluid, but it is certainly not from the text of this bill. Please review the definition of cigarette in Section 5d and save yourself another misguided trip to the convenience store. As for the blanket prohibition on flavouring ordinary cigarettes, I remain steadfast in support of the provision. United States FDA studies have found that 17-year olds are three times as likely as those over 25 to consume flavoured tobacco, because flavoured tobacco is marketed almost exclusively towards youth and contributes significantly to youth smoking rates. It's a gateway drug, plain and simple. Their prohibition is absolutely necessary to cull tobacco use once and for all."
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Arachaea
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 459
Founded: May 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachaea » Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:25 am

Ainin wrote:
Arachaea wrote:"I know quite a few people who've started e-cigarettes and nothing bad has happened to their physical health due to it.

"I know quite a few people that have jaywalked and not been hit by cars. Your personal observations are, for one, irrelevant, and for two, inconsistent with the emerging scientific consensus that vaping fluids still contain unacceptably large quantities of carcinogens and other harmful substances."

And yes, it's addictive but coffee is addictive too and I don't see you going round trying to ban coffee now, do I?

"Your analogy would make sense if caffeine created a physical addiction comparable in scale and harm to heroin and cocaine. Nicotine is widely-recognised as a highly addictive drug with the potential of harming mental development in teenagers and increasing the spread of cancer. We restrict access to oxycodone to prevent its abuse by those that have no legitimate reason to use it. So, I ask again, why should nicotine, a comparably addictive and harmful drug, not be held to the same standard?"

And I think that e-cigarettes should be reserved for those who deem them necessary to stop their smoking addiction.

"That is quite literally the opposite of what you've been arguing so far. You have been arguing for their unrestricted commercial sale."

"In terms of the e-cigarettes, I have brought to the senate's attention a paper by the UK Government stating that e-cigarettes have little risk, yet it is funny that you ignore that. It's almost as if you only accept evidence as if it agrees with you. And I have consistently made it clear that while I oppose a full ban on the commercial use of e-cigarettes, I think that the government should still make sure that people who need them for medical reasons get them."
The Principality of Arachaea

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads