Nariterrr wrote:1) It makes more sense, especially since we are a Parliamentary Republic.
I know, but we are the NSG Senate. I suppose it's more of a technicality and at the end of the day people will end up calling each other what they like.
2) That clause is to stop the mixing between the executive branch and the legislative branch. However, my proposal on the executive does make an exception to this clause (cabinet members)
My only issue with that is that if another executive proposal passes but this legislative one does, we may be in an awkward situation. I suppose we could amend it if we did do that though.
3) The majority of countries do it.
Fair enough.
5) It's a check against the President declaring war on his own will, most countries have this rule too.
I agree with the need for Parliament to approve military action, I just don't think a two thirds majority should be required and I think there should be a clause that Parliament can only declare war if the President allows it, otherwise we could be in a situation where Parliament starts a war that the President doesn't support, so the President, as commander-in-chief, simply refuses to commit troops to the war.
9) For example, 15 people have to vote to make a bill a law, it doesn't apply for things like debate, only voting.
Ah, I see. In complete agreement then.
16) This rule is in place in many countries, we don't have jails
I'm not that bothered by it, it's just if someone gets impeached then that OOC player has to create a new character if they want to participate in the RP. Seems a little unfair. Plus political comebacks could be fun.
Thanks for taking all my other comments on board. Even if you don't agree with the comments above I think this proposal is still very good and will support it.
