Hindia Belanda wrote:Alistan wrote:
"This just a Republican way to make the best out of a Republic of Elizia, this is just an improvement on the wording of what the NIP proposed.
It won't work with the word "haram", because the fringe fundamentalists would deem haram to minorities and that would upset them and the minorities will be upset themselves, its like calling themselves "goyim" or "infidel", it would imply a negative connotation.
Keep in mind that the population is 51% Muslim and 49% minorities
"You might have confused the word 'haram' with 'kafir' which is equal in meaning to what you described as infidel. Haram is a label commonly used on products that do not meet the Islamic dietary law requirements — it is akin to the word Kosher and the concept of Kashrut in Judaism and thus, the term does not imply any negative connotation."
Thank you for explaining that. Would you like to sponsor the bill?