Advertisement

by Great Nepal » Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:13 am

by The New World Oceania » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:00 am
Great Nepal wrote:Hmm I'm not really sure if that is necessary - there have been examples of several iterations that started out with completely fleshed out history, demographics and other data which haven't lasted as long as some iterations that started rather barebones. I don't think the ultimate longevity of the RP has a lot to do with things like history or culture of the nation - because those aspects while interesting are inevitably going to be ignored; only time that was really used was for preamble to constitution. Given this I'd say we can go with traditional people submitting various proposals for those stuff and voting/ admin decision.

by MERIZoC » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:39 pm

by The Sarian » Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:51 pm

by The New World Oceania » Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:34 pm
MERIZoC wrote:A reminder:
"Resolved: The next iteration of the Senate shall be created by membership through resolutions and open debate through the lobby, not detailed proposals until further into the process."—Passed
The Sarian wrote:Resolved:
i) highly bureaucratic structures are banned;
ii) to help achieve this, all people who use the term "Committee of the Whole" from here on in are instantly banned from the senate.

by Arachaea » Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:41 pm

by The Sarian » Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:23 pm
The New World Oceania wrote:MERIZoC wrote:A reminder:
"Resolved: The next iteration of the Senate shall be created by membership through resolutions and open debate through the lobby, not detailed proposals until further into the process."—Passed
Sure, and I don't see anywhere in that resolution that says how these resolutions are supposed to be written. Or is "by a few very active people monopolizing the process" implied?The Sarian wrote:Resolved:
i) highly bureaucratic structures are banned;
ii) to help achieve this, all people who use the term "Committee of the Whole" from here on in are instantly banned from the senate.
When your anti-change worldview is so dogmatic that even new words scare you.
by Ainin » Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:36 pm

by The New World Oceania » Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:58 pm
The Sarian wrote:The New World Oceania wrote:Sure, and I don't see anywhere in that resolution that says how these resolutions are supposed to be written. Or is "by a few very active people monopolizing the process" implied?
When your anti-change worldview is so dogmatic that even new words scare you.
Since when did I have an anti-change worldview? You need to work on you insults lady, just throwing a words doesn't really work when they don't have at least a basis in fact...

by Costa Fierro » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:14 pm

by The New World Oceania » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:35 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:The solution, if there is one, isn't making things needlessly complicated.

by FreYhill » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:08 am




by Costa Fierro » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:10 am


by FreYhill » Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:08 am

by House of Judah » Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:40 am

by Costa Fierro » Sun Jan 01, 2017 4:20 am
The Sarian wrote:Oooh im in a gang now. I hope we have jackets.

by The New World Oceania » Sun Jan 01, 2017 8:37 am

by The Sarian » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:40 am

by The New World Oceania » Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:41 am
Author: NWO
Sponsors: TectonixResolved: Committees shall help to facilitate the blank slate process.

by Tectonix » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:40 pm
The New World Oceania wrote:I'm formally submitting it as a resolution.Author: NWO
Sponsors:Resolved: Committees shall help to facilitate the blank slate process.

by Lykens » Mon Jan 02, 2017 9:14 pm

by Costa Fierro » Mon Jan 02, 2017 9:44 pm
Lykens wrote:Idea: Nonpartisan legislature 99.999999% homosexual country.
Ye/Ye+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement