Advertisement

by Arkolon » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:55 am

by The New World Oceania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:59 am
Arkolon wrote:It's only two weeks, it's not that bad.

by The Sarian » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:00 am

by Arkolon » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:02 am

by The New World Oceania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:03 am
The Sarian wrote:I mean, you're the one who wrote the motion. If you cared about activity and all the rest of it, you could have just not done it?

by Ikania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:04 am

by Collatis » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:20 am
Ikania wrote:I'd like to bring attention to a nation called "SLP Whip" which telegrammed our party members and ordered them to vote 'nay' on the no-confidence bill, as if that was the option to bring down the government. Whoever's behind that account impersonated a party official to try and sabotage our vote.
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by MERIZoC » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:31 am

by DrWinner » Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:54 am

by Takhshiyt » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:03 pm

by MERIZoC » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:19 pm
Takhshiyt wrote:>Elizia
>poor third world country
>votes to build a massive environment protection agency
>that can kill poachers whenever they want
>meanwhile Elizians are starving
Lel

by Arkolon » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:26 pm

by Takhshiyt » Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:42 pm

by NSG Senate Administrators » Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:08 pm
by Ainin » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:38 pm
Takhshiyt wrote:>Elizia
>poor third world country
>votes to build a massive environment protection agency
>that can kill poachers whenever they want
>meanwhile Elizians are starving

by Takhshiyt » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:20 am
Ainin wrote:Takhshiyt wrote:>Elizia
>poor third world country
>votes to build a massive environment protection agency
Southern Asia has a massive smuggling and poaching problem. A massive problem requires massive remedial action.>that can kill poachers whenever they want
We still have homicide laws. The Department of Justice will indict and prosecute any wildlife protection officer that engages in excessive force.>meanwhile Elizians are starving
Food insecurity isn't actually that severe in Southeast Asia. In countries with half our GDP per capita (Burma and Cambodia), undernourishment rates barely reach 15%.

by Lykens » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:22 am

by Arkolon » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:26 am
Takhshiyt wrote:A question too for anyone, what is the tax rates in Elizia?

by Arachaea » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:27 am
Takhshiyt wrote:Ainin wrote:Southern Asia has a massive smuggling and poaching problem. A massive problem requires massive remedial action.
We still have homicide laws. The Department of Justice will indict and prosecute any wildlife protection officer that engages in excessive force.
Food insecurity isn't actually that severe in Southeast Asia. In countries with half our GDP per capita (Burma and Cambodia), undernourishment rates barely reach 15%.
I understand that. But I hardly doubt our national government should be setting up bureaucracy to " save the animals" when we are in deep trouble economically and otherwise. I quote:
"iv. Wildlife Protection Agents shall be authorized to use lethal force against poachers if necessary to protect themselves or a protected species."
"c: Under the WPA there shall be 5,000 law enforcement officials with the responsibility of enforcing federal environmental and wildlife legislation."
Really? A dirt poor nation like ours is going to recruit, train, and pay 5,000 people to run around shooting people for poaching the wild Elizian fire breasted boar? Really? I am all for protecting animal species, but there has to be a better solution at the moment. We don't have loads of cash laying around to pay for this, Elizia actually has a limited amount of money. And notice that the DoJ can't prosecute because it is now lawful for the WPA officers to kill people if they are caught poaching.
A question too for anyone, what is the tax rates in Elizia?

by MERIZoC » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:29 am
Really? A dirt poor nation like ours is going to recruit, train, and pay 5,000 people to run around shooting people for poaching the wild Elizian fire breasted boar? Really? I am all for protecting animal species, but there has to be a better solution at the moment. We don't have loads of cash laying around to pay for this, Elizia actually has a limited amount of money. And notice that the DoJ can't prosecute because it is now lawful for the WPA officers to kill people if they are caught poaching.

by Arachaea » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:34 am
by Tumbra » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:41 am
Opinion Research Survey Number Ten
This poll was conducted by measuring the number of Senators who voted in the last round of voting. Before any of you pedantics grab at my throat, this is the best way of doing things. There would be no way to measure opinion otherwise.
The question polled was this.
"If an election for the government of Elizia were to be held tomorrow, who would you vote for?"
The results were as such.
National Coalition - 34.0% (18/53)
- of which Path to Harmony 7/18
- of which Elizia First 8/18
- of which Chinese Interests 2/18
- of which Independents in the government 1/18
Liberal Coalition - 45.3% (24/53)
- of which Social Liberal 12/24
- of which Liberal Democrat 12/24
Elizian Communist Party - 13.2% (7/53)
- of which Communist 7/7
Independents & Others - 7.5% (4/53)
- of which Elizian National Congress 1/4
- of which People's Movement for Elizia 1/4
- of which Independents 2/4
Turnout was up on last poll.

by Arkolon » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:45 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement