Collatis wrote:So... what did I miss?
You still need to answer my question in President's Questions.
Advertisement

by The Sarian » Tue Sep 20, 2016 11:26 pm
Collatis wrote:So... what did I miss?

by Britanno 3 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:33 am

by Maklohi Vai » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:57 am

by Britanno 3 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:36 am
Maklohi Vai wrote:*The decision above is solely that of the NSG Senate Administration, and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of NS Moderation. It has no effect outside of this RP.

by Collatis » Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:27 pm
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:19 pm

by Eol Sha » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:30 pm

by Belmaria » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:31 pm
Eol Sha wrote:The questions are worded a little confusingly.

by Geilinor » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:33 pm

by Eol Sha » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:36 pm

by Ikania » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:38 pm

by DrWinner » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:38 pm

by FreYhill » Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:45 pm

by Takhshiyt » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:21 pm

by Lykens » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:47 pm
Takhshiyt wrote:I just signed up in the sign ups thread, and I do have a couple of questions.
Is there a map of Elizia?
And is there any party out there that would fit along libertarian leaning beliefs? If not ,that is OK, I'll stick with independent.
EDIT: Also, would it be appropriate to create my Senator's bio before I am officially accepted, or should I defer until it is official?

by Takhshiyt » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Lykens wrote:Takhshiyt wrote:I just signed up in the sign ups thread, and I do have a couple of questions.
Is there a map of Elizia?
And is there any party out there that would fit along libertarian leaning beliefs? If not ,that is OK, I'll stick with independent.
EDIT: Also, would it be appropriate to create my Senator's bio before I am officially accepted, or should I defer until it is official?
I think the libdems are kind of that vein a bit, they seem to have an informal grouping of more Libertarian leaning senators.
Here's the Elizia doc, tells you all the important information
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wSz ... ucgQr-03-I
Please make sure to abide by it when creating your senator, a gay protestant European fellow isn't going to make sense here.
You're considered accepted unless the Admins reject you, so Senate away, welcome.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Sep 21, 2016 10:22 pm
Britanno 3 wrote:It has come to the attention of the admin team that Nariterrr has been using a puppet account, Belgicaven, to gain an unfair advantage within the roleplay. This has been discovered based on statements by Nariterrr himself as well as investigations by both admins and members of the community. This has been a long-running affair in which Nariterrr has, on multiple occasions, defended himself with statements that were later to be contradicted. The admins have concluded that Nariterrr has blatantly lied to us several times, failing to learn his lessons from previous warnings in the past regarding a similar matter. His continuous rule-breaking and lying has given us little choice but to upgrade his warning level to black, which carries with it an eight week suspension. If Nariterrr would like to appeal the ruling, he is welcome to get into contact with the admins, but we cannot disclose evidence publicly as it contains personal information.
A message largely similar to this has been sent to Nariterrr himself.

by Britanno 3 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:07 am
Lykens wrote:Please make sure to abide by it when creating your senator, a gay protestant European fellow isn't going to make sense here.


by Eol Sha » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:35 am

by Tumbra » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:35 am

by Lykens » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:10 am

by DrWinner » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:55 am

by Belmaria » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:58 am
DrWinner wrote:To the whistleblower in the telegrams:
I replied to you. Please check back to see response.

by Britanno 3 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:00 pm
Belmaria wrote:DrWinner wrote:To the whistleblower in the telegrams:
I replied to you. Please check back to see response.
This "whistleblower" sent something to me too. It looks like an attempt to divide and conquer by having us pit ourselves against each other. Thorough investigation is needed before any action can be taken.


by DrWinner » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:01 pm
Belmaria wrote:DrWinner wrote:To the whistleblower in the telegrams:
I replied to you. Please check back to see response.
This "whistleblower" sent something to me too. It looks like an attempt to divide and conquer by having us pit ourselves against each other. Thorough investigation is needed before any action can be taken.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement