NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber: I came, I saw, I cleaned up after myself

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Wed May 13, 2015 2:00 pm

Ikania wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:"Oh shi... oh darn." Winston chugs his beer and quickly fills another.

They edge closer, their batons out and mustaches well-maintained.

Winston drinks beer after beer in frighteningly quick succession.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 2:17 pm

Mollary wrote:"While I will support the majority of measures in this bill, at least begrudgingly, I must draw the line at a 4% tariff; any such barriers to trade are worrying and implementing a tariff where there was not one before seems objectionable, and to some extent a failure to embrace the global economy and our own participation in it."


"This is not a protectionist measure - just a small duty, as is common around the world in nearly every country, equally on imports and exports. This will not be biased against any country."
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Mollary
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1616
Founded: Nov 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mollary » Wed May 13, 2015 2:23 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Mollary wrote:"While I will support the majority of measures in this bill, at least begrudgingly, I must draw the line at a 4% tariff; any such barriers to trade are worrying and implementing a tariff where there was not one before seems objectionable, and to some extent a failure to embrace the global economy and our own participation in it."


"This is not a protectionist measure - just a small duty, as is common around the world in nearly every country, equally on imports and exports. This will not be biased against any country."

"I agree that it is small in comparison to some nations, but in a globalized world, as a small nation, we must do whatever it takes to remain competitive and open, and introducing a tariff where there was not one before is unwise. Moreover, I believe there was talk of a surplus? Surely a tariff should be avoided if we can afford to avoid it."
Good stuff
Apathy
Bad things

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 2:31 pm

Mollary wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
"This is not a protectionist measure - just a small duty, as is common around the world in nearly every country, equally on imports and exports. This will not be biased against any country."

"I agree that it is small in comparison to some nations, but in a globalized world, as a small nation, we must do whatever it takes to remain competitive and open, and introducing a tariff where there was not one before is unwise. Moreover, I believe there was talk of a surplus? Surely a tariff should be avoided if we can afford to avoid it."


"It is just a simple duty on imports and exports that most people will not even notice nor will it significantly affect our economic growth or trade. Removal of this duty from the bill would reduce revenues by around $6.4 billion so we cannot afford it. It is important to ensure our taxation is broad based so we can do things like invest in public services - or provide a tax cut to middle income earners."
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Mollary
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1616
Founded: Nov 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mollary » Wed May 13, 2015 2:37 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Mollary wrote:"I agree that it is small in comparison to some nations, but in a globalized world, as a small nation, we must do whatever it takes to remain competitive and open, and introducing a tariff where there was not one before is unwise. Moreover, I believe there was talk of a surplus? Surely a tariff should be avoided if we can afford to avoid it."


"It is just a simple duty on imports and exports that most people will not even notice nor will it significantly affect our economic growth or trade. Removal of this duty from the bill would reduce revenues by around $6.4 billion so we cannot afford it. It is important to ensure our taxation is broad based so we can do things like invest in public services - or provide a tax cut to middle income earners."

"A 4% rise in imported goods and on our exports will, firstly, stack up over a year for most consumers, increasing the cost of living. Secondly, this tariff rise could make the marginal difference to price in our exports to cause people to substitute from our goods to other goods. If 0% cannot be afforded, would the government consider a lower rate to further minimize the negative impacts of such taxation?"
Good stuff
Apathy
Bad things

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 4:00 pm

Mollary wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
"It is just a simple duty on imports and exports that most people will not even notice nor will it significantly affect our economic growth or trade. Removal of this duty from the bill would reduce revenues by around $6.4 billion so we cannot afford it. It is important to ensure our taxation is broad based so we can do things like invest in public services - or provide a tax cut to middle income earners."

"A 4% rise in imported goods and on our exports will, firstly, stack up over a year for most consumers, increasing the cost of living. Secondly, this tariff rise could make the marginal difference to price in our exports to cause people to substitute from our goods to other goods. If 0% cannot be afforded, would the government consider a lower rate to further minimize the negative impacts of such taxation?"


"I think a $6.4 billion cut to public services or increases in income taxes would be more harmful to families than a small duty on imports and exports. This is a part of a wider progressive, fiscally responsible plan to make hard working families better off.

The 4% tax rate is competitive, and exports will still grow and we will remain very competitive. This is a proposal to grow the economy and provide public services in an equitable manner. The effect of this duty will be barely felt on net trade and it is not a protectionist measure."
Last edited by Atlanticatia on Wed May 13, 2015 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:07 pm

"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 4:10 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"


"What makes you think we're moving away from free trade?"
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:11 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"


"What makes you think we're moving away from free trade?"


"The sudden itch (and past itches) of the current government to enact high corporate taxes and tariffs."
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Wed May 13, 2015 4:17 pm

"The tax is small, helps protect national jobs in key industries, creates very little adverse effects on the economy, and generates a lot more government revenue that will be spent on programs that would, at the very least, cancel out any negative effects caused by the tariff in the first place. I'm not opposed."
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:49 pm

Arkolon wrote:"The tax is small, helps protect national jobs in key industries, creates very little adverse effects on the economy, and generates a lot more government revenue that will be spent on programs that would, at the very least, cancel out any negative effects caused by the tariff in the first place. I'm not opposed."


((I really hope you are roleplaying))
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 4:51 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Ikania wrote:They edge closer, their batons out and mustaches well-maintained.

Winston drinks beer after beer in frighteningly quick succession.


Boris sits there expecting the police to reveal themselves as Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Michael Palin, Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVV7hfbYOsg
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 5:00 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"


"What makes you think we're moving away from free trade?"


"Do you seriously need to ask somebody to point out that a 4% tariff is less free than the current 0% which is in fact one thing that is meant by the term free trade in this area? Goods or services traded without the charging of tariffs of any kind and any level on the import or export of goods. Are you in denial over the policy or do you just not care how you try and sell your policies however egregious the reasons you find yourself falling back on?"
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 5:02 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Arkolon wrote:"The tax is small, helps protect national jobs in key industries, creates very little adverse effects on the economy, and generates a lot more government revenue that will be spent on programs that would, at the very least, cancel out any negative effects caused by the tariff in the first place. I'm not opposed."


((I really hope you are roleplaying))


OOC: Arkolon actually gave me the idea for this tax and is a full supporter.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 6:12 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
((I really hope you are roleplaying))


OOC: Arkolon actually gave me the idea for this tax and is a full supporter.


OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.

"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.

Tariffs suck."
Last edited by The Liberated Territories on Wed May 13, 2015 6:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
New Bierstaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 849
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bierstaat » Wed May 13, 2015 6:29 pm

I am no longer a protectionist. I oppose this tarriff and will only support tarriffs as a retaliatory measure against other countries that impose tarriffs on our goods or unfairly compete in some other way.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28

Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10953
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Wed May 13, 2015 7:21 pm

OOC: I just realized, you aren't allowed to have alcoholic beverages in Parliament so...

ORDER. ORDER.

"Stop drinking in Parliament. While members may not make accusations about being drunk it seems, alcoholic beverages are not allowed because of Standing Order Number Five, which clearly says you can't have alcohol in Parliament. Take it to the bar within this Parliament."
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Wed May 13, 2015 7:26 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:I am no longer a protectionist. I oppose this tarriff and will only support tarriffs as a retaliatory measure against other countries that impose tarriffs on our goods or unfairly compete in some other way.

Cause that turned out well for the Americans with the Hawley-Smoot tariffs right?
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 7:35 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
OOC: Arkolon actually gave me the idea for this tax and is a full supporter.


OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.

"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.

Tariffs suck."


"Do you understand that this is not a protectionist tariff? It is a neutral import and export duty. Pretty much every country has minimal customs duties like this. It'd be a good idea to actually read the bill."
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:35 pm

*takes out a potent energy drink*
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Wed May 13, 2015 7:41 pm

Gloria drinks from a milk carton totally not filled with scotch.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:42 pm

New Zepuha wrote:Gloria drinks from a milk carton totally not filled with scotch.


"RAW MILK. WE HAVE A RAW MILK DRINKER HERE!"

"ARREST THIS GUY - HE' S DRINKING RAW MILK!"
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 7:44 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.

"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.

Tariffs suck."


"Do you understand that this is not a protectionist tariff? It is a neutral import and export duty. Pretty much every country has minimal customs duties like this. It'd be a good idea to actually read the bill."


"Do you understand that free trade is the elimination of all tariffs on all goods and services? The reason the tariff is there is irrelevant, it's presence means we will not have free trade. It would be a good idea if you read a book about economics before making it up as you go along."
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:45 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.

"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.

Tariffs suck."


"Do you understand that this is not a protectionist tariff? It is a neutral import and export duty. Pretty much every country has minimal customs duties like this. It'd be a good idea to actually read the bill."


All tariffs are protectionist. Just imagine the state as it's own corporation, and all corporations under it subsidarities.

If such high numbers on steel alone caused so much complication, than what would a export and import duty do? Drive businesses away, kill jobs, create a black market, etc.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 7:46 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:Gloria drinks from a milk carton totally not filled with scotch.


"RAW MILK. WE HAVE A RAW MILK DRINKER HERE!"

"ARREST THIS GUY - HE' S DRINKING RAW MILK!"


"I thought only babies drank "cooked" milk. Don't tell me your mum still warms up milk for you every night before bed?" :p
Slava Ukraini

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads