Winston drinks beer after beer in frighteningly quick succession.
Advertisement

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed May 13, 2015 2:00 pm

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 2:17 pm
Mollary wrote:"While I will support the majority of measures in this bill, at least begrudgingly, I must draw the line at a 4% tariff; any such barriers to trade are worrying and implementing a tariff where there was not one before seems objectionable, and to some extent a failure to embrace the global economy and our own participation in it."

by Mollary » Wed May 13, 2015 2:23 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:Mollary wrote:"While I will support the majority of measures in this bill, at least begrudgingly, I must draw the line at a 4% tariff; any such barriers to trade are worrying and implementing a tariff where there was not one before seems objectionable, and to some extent a failure to embrace the global economy and our own participation in it."
"This is not a protectionist measure - just a small duty, as is common around the world in nearly every country, equally on imports and exports. This will not be biased against any country."

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 2:31 pm
Mollary wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:
"This is not a protectionist measure - just a small duty, as is common around the world in nearly every country, equally on imports and exports. This will not be biased against any country."
"I agree that it is small in comparison to some nations, but in a globalized world, as a small nation, we must do whatever it takes to remain competitive and open, and introducing a tariff where there was not one before is unwise. Moreover, I believe there was talk of a surplus? Surely a tariff should be avoided if we can afford to avoid it."

by Mollary » Wed May 13, 2015 2:37 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:Mollary wrote:"I agree that it is small in comparison to some nations, but in a globalized world, as a small nation, we must do whatever it takes to remain competitive and open, and introducing a tariff where there was not one before is unwise. Moreover, I believe there was talk of a surplus? Surely a tariff should be avoided if we can afford to avoid it."
"It is just a simple duty on imports and exports that most people will not even notice nor will it significantly affect our economic growth or trade. Removal of this duty from the bill would reduce revenues by around $6.4 billion so we cannot afford it. It is important to ensure our taxation is broad based so we can do things like invest in public services - or provide a tax cut to middle income earners."

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 4:00 pm
Mollary wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:
"It is just a simple duty on imports and exports that most people will not even notice nor will it significantly affect our economic growth or trade. Removal of this duty from the bill would reduce revenues by around $6.4 billion so we cannot afford it. It is important to ensure our taxation is broad based so we can do things like invest in public services - or provide a tax cut to middle income earners."
"A 4% rise in imported goods and on our exports will, firstly, stack up over a year for most consumers, increasing the cost of living. Secondly, this tariff rise could make the marginal difference to price in our exports to cause people to substitute from our goods to other goods. If 0% cannot be afforded, would the government consider a lower rate to further minimize the negative impacts of such taxation?"

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:07 pm

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 4:10 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:11 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"
"What makes you think we're moving away from free trade?"

by Arkolon » Wed May 13, 2015 4:17 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 4:49 pm
Arkolon wrote:"The tax is small, helps protect national jobs in key industries, creates very little adverse effects on the economy, and generates a lot more government revenue that will be spent on programs that would, at the very least, cancel out any negative effects caused by the tariff in the first place. I'm not opposed."

by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 4:51 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 5:00 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:"It is not about being competitive; it is about remaining on top. We could be Central America's golden jewel, and outperform the rest of the region and secure ourselves for years - decades even. The benefits gained from free trade - if anyone wants to open a history book - are too immense to ignore, and this tariff would only hamper us on the long run. Why tax productive activity anyway?"
"What makes you think we're moving away from free trade?"

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 5:02 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Arkolon wrote:"The tax is small, helps protect national jobs in key industries, creates very little adverse effects on the economy, and generates a lot more government revenue that will be spent on programs that would, at the very least, cancel out any negative effects caused by the tariff in the first place. I'm not opposed."
((I really hope you are roleplaying))

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 6:12 pm

by New Bierstaat » Wed May 13, 2015 6:29 pm
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

by Zurkerx » Wed May 13, 2015 7:21 pm

by New Zepuha » Wed May 13, 2015 7:26 pm
New Bierstaat wrote:I am no longer a protectionist. I oppose this tarriff and will only support tarriffs as a retaliatory measure against other countries that impose tarriffs on our goods or unfairly compete in some other way.
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by Atlanticatia » Wed May 13, 2015 7:35 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:
OOC: Arkolon actually gave me the idea for this tax and is a full supporter.
OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.
"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.
Tariffs suck."

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:35 pm

by New Zepuha » Wed May 13, 2015 7:41 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:42 pm
New Zepuha wrote:Gloria drinks from a milk carton totally not filled with scotch.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 7:44 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.
"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.
Tariffs suck."
"Do you understand that this is not a protectionist tariff? It is a neutral import and export duty. Pretty much every country has minimal customs duties like this. It'd be a good idea to actually read the bill."

by The Liberated Territories » Wed May 13, 2015 7:45 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
OOC: What sort of nonsense is Ark feeding you? Tariffs are arguably as bad as corporate taxes.
"In the early 2000s Curious George attempted to raise steel tariffs in the US from 8% all the way to 30% in some cases. The results were devastating; 200,000 Americans lost their jobs to the steel tariffs during 2002, or $4 billion in wages. One out of four of these job losses occurred in the metal
manufacturing, machinery and equipment and transportation equipment and parts sectors. Sauce. The tariffs were primarily designed for, like all protectionism, for the few at the expense of the many. They were so bad for everyone, the World Trade Organization called the tariffs, illegal. Thankfully, he lifted "some" to prevent a trade war with the EU, which would of damaged the US economy.
Tariffs suck."
"Do you understand that this is not a protectionist tariff? It is a neutral import and export duty. Pretty much every country has minimal customs duties like this. It'd be a good idea to actually read the bill."

by The Nihilistic view » Wed May 13, 2015 7:46 pm

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement