Advertisement

by Valluto » Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:26 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:33 pm
Nixon-Now wrote:*Talks on his phone as he notices a vote is occuring, and continues to do so until it is his turn.*
Nay.

by Murkwood » Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:37 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Lucasaer » Thu Feb 05, 2015 6:23 pm

by Collatis » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:03 pm
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by Collatis » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:14 pm
"I'm a little confused, are you talking about classes based on teaching the "one true faith" according to the school. Or about mandatory religious education that teaches about all faiths in a secular manner? Or maybe both."
"I wont speak for the senator but in context of the bill, its the former. The original debate arose out of clause 6j which prohibits mandatory religious ceremonies/ speeches; which was correctly stated to prohibit teaching of one 'true faith'."
Dragomerian Islands wrote:"If they do not want to be taught something, then they should not go to that school. It is as simple as that. No one is forcing them to choose a religious school."
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by Dragomerian Islands » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:24 pm
Collatis wrote:"I'm a little confused, are you talking about classes based on teaching the "one true faith" according to the school. Or about mandatory religious education that teaches about all faiths in a secular manner? Or maybe both.""I wont speak for the senator but in context of the bill, its the former. The original debate arose out of clause 6j which prohibits mandatory religious ceremonies/ speeches; which was correctly stated to prohibit teaching of one 'true faith'."
Yes I was referring to mandatory classes that taught "the one true faith." I have no problem with classes that would teach about all faiths. In fact, that is a very good idea, in my opinion.
OOC: Sorry that it took me so long to respondDragomerian Islands wrote:"If they do not want to be taught something, then they should not go to that school. It is as simple as that. No one is forcing them to choose a religious school."
One of the most common reasons why parents send their kids to private school, is because the public school system in their district is not very good. However, as I am sure most people know, most private schools are very expensive, leaving parents' the only choice of religious, particularly Catholic, schools. Attending religious school could be some children's only chance to get a decent education. Religious classes should not be mandatory as shown by the above.
| Proud Member of the following Alliances: International Space Agency IATA :Member of the United National Group: INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOUNDER | WAR LEVEL []Total War []War Declared []Conflict []Increased Readiness [x]Peacetime | IMPORTANT NEWS: None |

by Collatis » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:27 pm
Dragomerian Islands wrote:If they do not want a religious education, they should not attend a religious school.
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by Dragomerian Islands » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:29 pm
Collatis wrote:Dragomerian Islands wrote:If they do not want a religious education, they should not attend a religious school.
Sometimes that is their only option. Remember, religious schools can still have religious classes, just not mandatory ones. Is there any reason why they ought, or need, to be mandatory?
| Proud Member of the following Alliances: International Space Agency IATA :Member of the United National Group: INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOUNDER | WAR LEVEL []Total War []War Declared []Conflict []Increased Readiness [x]Peacetime | IMPORTANT NEWS: None |

by The Nihilistic view » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:31 pm
Dragomerian Islands wrote:Collatis wrote:"I'm a little confused, are you talking about classes based on teaching the "one true faith" according to the school. Or about mandatory religious education that teaches about all faiths in a secular manner? Or maybe both.""I wont speak for the senator but in context of the bill, its the former. The original debate arose out of clause 6j which prohibits mandatory religious ceremonies/ speeches; which was correctly stated to prohibit teaching of one 'true faith'."
Yes I was referring to mandatory classes that taught "the one true faith." I have no problem with classes that would teach about all faiths. In fact, that is a very good idea, in my opinion.
OOC: Sorry that it took me so long to respond
One of the most common reasons why parents send their kids to private school, is because the public school system in their district is not very good. However, as I am sure most people know, most private schools are very expensive, leaving parents' the only choice of religious, particularly Catholic, schools. Attending religious school could be some children's only chance to get a decent education. Religious classes should not be mandatory as shown by the above.
If they do not want a religious education, they should not attend a religious school.

by Zurkerx » Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:34 pm

by Soviet Canuckistan » Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:38 pm

by People Who Say Ni » Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:42 pm
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%
by Ainin » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:18 pm

by Nixon-Now » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:20 pm
Ainin wrote:"Members of the House, be aware that I have appointed Maître Sabina Korsh as Director of the National Procuratorate. Thank you."

by Gothmogs » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:24 pm
by Ainin » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:26 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:29 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement