Advertisement
by Argentarino » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:38 am
Arkolon wrote:"Then please, Mr Araullo, criticise the bill at hand, and do not fall subject to the same mistakes your colleague Mr Diaz has made in criticising a part of a bill that is factually incorrect. I am not politicking, I am saying that we have taken all necessary precautions, on the advice of Democratic Left members themselves, to close all possible loopholes in SCEDA. The only arguments I have heard come from the Opposition is about problems that are not even there. By all means, Mr Araullo, criticise the bill at hand. I am still waiting on the Opposition to begin. I am not politicking; I have been very open to criticism and very open to amendments proposed by members of the Opposition. Please avoid joining the one colleague that has stained your party's image and instead join those who work to cooperate and not to bicker."
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:06 am
by Ikania » Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:43 am
by The Danish Confederacy » Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:18 am
General Dicking Around wrote:AND THEN JOHN SMASHED THE WINDOW AND FUCKED A GOOSE WITH A LIGHTSABER
[violet] wrote:Right. It's words. Billions of words. :)
Nerd³ wrote:You can't milk a dick/Vaginas don't drink milk.
Douglas Adams wrote:In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
by Ainin » Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:20 am
Lykens wrote:"Mister Speaker, I am quite sure you are as fond of parliamentary procedure as I am, and as I recall, all amendments must be seconded, and then voted on for two hours. I do not believe that was the case for the Prime Minister's edits, and I would like to raise a point of order regarding them."
Lykens wrote:An aide rushed in, and spoke to Kenneth in a hushed tone. The Chief Whip nodded, and stood up again.
"Mister Speaker, it seems to me that the Right Honorable Prime Minister took a portion of the bill to the Coffee shop, in need of 'Opinions, thoughts, and criticism'. It seems to me that the Prime Minister herself is not even sure the bill is ready for chamber, and therefore I move to send the bill back to the Coffee Shop, for further edits that it most definitely needs."
Arkolon wrote:"I am sorry for your constituents if this is how you react to updated legislation."
Beta Test wrote:"I am sorry for my constituents that you're the government."
Lykens wrote:"I am sorry for the members of this august body, having witnessed an individual try to desecrate its procedure, unlike any before. Save Boris Johnson. But he's good now."
The Saint James Islands wrote:"Motherfucking fifthed."
Arkolon wrote:Lykens, please read the goddamn bill. You're only embarrassing yourself.
Arkolon wrote:Lykens, I know you're trying to be cute, but I talked to Atlanticatia and I closed all the loopholes. With Section 1, Articles 4, and A.
by Ainin » Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:32 am
Standing Order No 6 - Regarding Amendments
1
After first being presented to the Speaker, the original bill shall never be altered without the former's permission.
2
Friendly amendments to bills in queue or being debated must have their text presented in their entirety to the Speaker prior to edit. The text of a bill in queue or being debated shall never be altered without the Speaker's prior approval. The amendment shall then be announced by the author of the bill in the Chamber so that all members of the House are made aware of it. The bill shall then have the word "(Amended)" added to its short title.
3
Hostile amendments are only in order when brought against bills authored by the Speaker of the House.
4
Anyone that fails to respect this standing order is in contempt of Parliament.
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:40 am
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:48 am
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:50 am
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:06 am
Arkolon wrote:"Mr Covasku, could you please expand on the "loopholes" you believe there are in the SCEDA? I would like to address them."
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:21 am
Zurkerx wrote:Arkolon wrote:"Mr Covasku, could you please expand on the "loopholes" you believe there are in the SCEDA? I would like to address them."
"I am rather concern with the ' all private enterprises' part. While corporations would still have to pay the carbon tax, petroleum tax, and would not be allowed to open their headquarters in a NEZ, it still allows a corporation to gain some of the advantages off the NEZ. I just personally believe we should be helping small and start up businesses here. As for the Enterprise Investment Scheme, is an 'investment' by that individual only money or could it be anything?"
He pauses for a moment and takes a sip of water. He continues.
"As for the Work Remuneration Stimulus Programme and Employment Expansion Program, I see their potential but, I fear that this is only a temporary boost for our economy here. Are these tax breaks limited to small businesses or all? And, are these tax breaks good for that fiscal year only and then afterwards return to their normal rates? Business can only raise their wages and hire people so much here."
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:42 am
Arkolon wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
"I am rather concern with the ' all private enterprises' part. While corporations would still have to pay the carbon tax, petroleum tax, and would not be allowed to open their headquarters in a NEZ, it still allows a corporation to gain some of the advantages off the NEZ. I just personally believe we should be helping small and start up businesses here. As for the Enterprise Investment Scheme, is an 'investment' by that individual only money or could it be anything?"
"Yes, Mr Covasku, SCEDA allows all commercial or industrial enterprises to set up shop in a New Economic Zone. Pardon me if the utilitarian argument does not get to you, but if we can provide a small tax break for, say, a multinational corporation to open a factory in the small, developing village of San Pablo -- where only the operations conducted in the NEZ would receive tax breaks-- so that that Localidad can have more jobs, more stores, more Gross Value Added, then I think it is worth it. The purpose of the NEZ programme is to help develop rural areas, and I think it does this very well-- regardless of where the CEO that helps us develop rural Calaverde was born.
And yes, it's only money. Why?"
He pauses for a moment and takes a sip of water. He continues."As for the Work Remuneration Stimulus Programme and Employment Expansion Program, I see their potential but, I fear that this is only a temporary boost for our economy here. Are these tax breaks limited to small businesses or all? And, are these tax breaks good for that fiscal year only and then afterwards return to their normal rates? Business can only raise their wages and hire people so much here."
The tax breaks are for all companies that grow their workforce or paychecks. Again, though, this would only apply to the operations conducted within Calaverde and not elsewhere in the world. Secondly, yes, the tax breaks are limited to that one year: if a company expands their workforce by 20% in one year, then they would receive tax breaks as to offset some of that cost. These provisions subsidise job creation and subsidise wage growth-- and they are particularly helpful for startups. A startup going from 5 employees to 6 in one year would see a workforce growth of 20%! This means that, just in tax benefits, that company has enough money to hire almost two new employees after just one year. This would be magnificent for startups and provide them with a huge leg up when growing themselves."
by The Saint James Islands » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:51 am
Ainin wrote:Pierre stares at Diego disapprovingly for two seconds.
Classical republican, environmental student
Pro: Parliamentarism, civic virtue, positive liberty, soft Euroscepticism, the scientific method, facts
Anti: Presidentialism, authoritarianism, corruption, populism, hard Euroscepticism, misinformation
IC posts made by this nation are non-canonical.
This nation does not reflect my actual political views.
Do not use orally after using rectally.Guilherme Magalhães
Senator for Ilhas de Santiago Ocidentais
Staunchly independent
[23:53] <StJames> ^fake news^
The death of the West will not be a homicide, but a suicide.
by The Nihilistic view » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:13 pm
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:25 pm
by Zurkerx » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:31 pm
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:37 pm
Zurkerx wrote:"Mr. Johnson does raise an interesting point that I didn't even think about. While the NEZ's affects may not be as bad as described, it still can lead to anti-competition within the surrounding area. Regardless, I am oppose to the government picking winners and losers and that should be minimum as possible."
by The Nihilistic view » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:51 pm
Arkolon wrote:Zurkerx wrote:"Mr. Johnson does raise an interesting point that I didn't even think about. While the NEZ's affects may not be as bad as described, it still can lead to anti-competition within the surrounding area. Regardless, I am oppose to the government picking winners and losers and that should be minimum as possible."
"Mr Covasku, the NEZ programme is to stimulate the development of CBDs in Calaverde's developing regions. Even without government interference, these CBDs would develop themselves over time, but at a much slower place, and their success is far from guaranteed. Once the free market forms a CBD, it is by definition a better place to conduct business than anywhere else in a town or city. SCEDA just makes CBDs develop much, much quicker and ensures their success and proper fruition. Mr Covasku, in reality, the SCEDA is no more anti-competition than the free market itself-- which is to say that the SCEDA is not that anti-competition at all."
by Arkolon » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:02 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Arkolon wrote:"Mr Covasku, the NEZ programme is to stimulate the development of CBDs in Calaverde's developing regions. Even without government interference, these CBDs would develop themselves over time, but at a much slower place, and their success is far from guaranteed. Once the free market forms a CBD, it is by definition a better place to conduct business than anywhere else in a town or city. SCEDA just makes CBDs develop much, much quicker and ensures their success and proper fruition. Mr Covasku, in reality, the SCEDA is no more anti-competition than the free market itself-- which is to say that the SCEDA is not that anti-competition at all."
"Even you concede it's at least a bit anti competition. There are ways to create thriving CBDs without putting firms outside them at a competitive disadvantage from a cost perspective or establishing them without so much government interference and control.
Secondly do the people in rural areas want to have industrial centers dumped on them by the government or are they perfectly happy as they are with their current way of life in the countryside working the land. These things would go much smoother if they are allowed to develop of their own accord rather than forced on people who might prefer their current way of life. What of the farmers or other people already living in the areas the zones will go? Will they be forcible displaced? Will the tax breaks be given to them as they are there already?
The more you try and argue for the bill the more problems and questions it brings up in my mind. That is very rare I fine with legislation and indicates to me it's not properly thought through."
by Nova Anglicana » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:03 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Arkolon wrote:"Mr Covasku, the NEZ programme is to stimulate the development of CBDs in Calaverde's developing regions. Even without government interference, these CBDs would develop themselves over time, but at a much slower place, and their success is far from guaranteed. Once the free market forms a CBD, it is by definition a better place to conduct business than anywhere else in a town or city. SCEDA just makes CBDs develop much, much quicker and ensures their success and proper fruition. Mr Covasku, in reality, the SCEDA is no more anti-competition than the free market itself-- which is to say that the SCEDA is not that anti-competition at all."
"Even you concede it's at least a bit anti competition. There are ways to create thriving CBDs without putting firms outside them at a competitive disadvantage from a cost perspective or establishing them without so much government interference and control.
Secondly do the people in rural areas want to have industrial centers dumped on them by the government or are they perfectly happy as they are with their current way of life in the countryside working the land. These things would go much smoother if they are allowed to develop of their own accord rather than forced on people who might prefer their current way of life. What of the farmers or other people already living in the areas the zones will go? Will they be forcible displaced? Will the tax breaks be given to them as they are there already?
The more you try and argue for the bill the more problems and questions it brings up in my mind. That is very rare I fine with legislation and indicates to me it's not properly thought through."
by The Danish Confederacy » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:09 pm
General Dicking Around wrote:AND THEN JOHN SMASHED THE WINDOW AND FUCKED A GOOSE WITH A LIGHTSABER
[violet] wrote:Right. It's words. Billions of words. :)
Nerd³ wrote:You can't milk a dick/Vaginas don't drink milk.
Douglas Adams wrote:In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
by New Werpland » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:12 pm
The Danish Confederacy wrote:"You know what? Screw this, I am out" says Håvard Theodor Tormod Kristiansen as he leaves the building.
by The Danish Confederacy » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:16 pm
General Dicking Around wrote:AND THEN JOHN SMASHED THE WINDOW AND FUCKED A GOOSE WITH A LIGHTSABER
[violet] wrote:Right. It's words. Billions of words. :)
Nerd³ wrote:You can't milk a dick/Vaginas don't drink milk.
Douglas Adams wrote:In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement