Advertisement
by Arkolon » Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:47 pm
by Glasgia » Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:49 pm
Arkolon wrote:That would have been funny if you had tried less hard and were up-to-date with, well, what's going on but hey, at least you made me care enough to reply.
by Arkolon » Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:55 pm
Glasgia wrote:Arkolon wrote:That would have been funny if you had tried less hard and were up-to-date with, well, what's going on but hey, at least you made me care enough to reply.
Aw, come on, it wasn't that bad I didn't want to add a smiley on the end to make it seem less aggressive because I felt it might've ruined it, sorry if it came out like I was about to knock you out and sell your organs to the mafia
by Neo Rome Republic » Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:57 pm
Arkolon wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Aw, come on, it wasn't that bad I didn't want to add a smiley on the end to make it seem less aggressive because I felt it might've ruined it, sorry if it came out like I was about to knock you out and sell your organs to the mafia
It's alright. I'm a run-of-the-mill centre-rightist, and even centre-to-centre-left in America, which is why it didn't feel like it applied to me as an insult in the first place.
Anyway, carry on with your lives.
by Glasgia » Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:57 pm
Arkolon wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Aw, come on, it wasn't that bad I didn't want to add a smiley on the end to make it seem less aggressive because I felt it might've ruined it, sorry if it came out like I was about to knock you out and sell your organs to the mafia
It's alright. I'm a run-of-the-mill centre-rightist, and even centre-to-centre-left in America, which is why it didn't feel like it applied to me as an insult in the first place.
Anyway, carry on with your lives.
by Heraklea- » Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:08 pm
by Atlanticatia » Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:32 pm
by The New Sea Territory » Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:34 pm
| Ⓐ ☭ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᚨ ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore
by Heraklea- » Wed Jun 17, 2015 4:11 am
The New Sea Territory wrote:"The Alliance seeks not for a violent revolution, but a revolution that is social and economic and in that sense may be classed as revolutionary. We believe in legislating worker’s right to democratic control of their own labour, granting them power over the means of production within an explicitly Socialist economic system. The post-feudal class system that dominates Capitalist societies must be eliminated through the destruction of profit systems and a peaceful assimilation into the Proletariat."
So....what part of the social revolution allows for collaboration with the Reform Party?
by Arkolon » Wed Jun 17, 2015 8:47 am
by New Werpland » Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:01 am
Heraklea- wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:"The Alliance seeks not for a violent revolution, but a revolution that is social and economic and in that sense may be classed as revolutionary. We believe in legislating worker’s right to democratic control of their own labour, granting them power over the means of production within an explicitly Socialist economic system. The post-feudal class system that dominates Capitalist societies must be eliminated through the destruction of profit systems and a peaceful assimilation into the Proletariat."
So....what part of the social revolution allows for collaboration with the Reform Party?
We remain a party committed to a gradualistic reform process to achieving social and economic changes we wish to see. The Reform Party, while occupying a quite different ideology, have agreed to work with us to govern this country and try to find the best solutions to the problems we face going forward. There is no sacrifice in principals by working with those who adhere to other ideology, merely recognition that we cannot force the changes we want on society. We must continuously dialogue and educate until finally our people are ready to take the leap and embrace socialist economics fully.
by Collatis » Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:46 am
New Werpland wrote:Oh I remember when the FDP left Coalicion Azul, there wasn't a way to accept a center right party into the coalition then. But now your all up for accepting a party that leans even more to the right than the FDP into the coalicion.
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders
by New Werpland » Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:49 am
Collatis wrote:New Werpland wrote:Oh I remember when the FDP left Coalicion Azul, there wasn't a way to accept a center right party into the coalition then. But now your all up for accepting a party that leans even more to the right than the FDP into the coalicion.
See, the thing is, the FDP had no interest in joining the Coalition and there was no need to have them do so.
by Argentarino » Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:10 pm
by Britanno 2 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:51 pm
Argentarino wrote:Difference is...Reform wanted to be part of a coalition...FDP didn't. See where the problem was?
by Ikania » Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:54 pm
by New Werpland » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:33 pm
by Lykens » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:36 pm
New Werpland wrote:Argentarino wrote:Difference is...Reform wanted to be part of a coalition...FDP didn't. See where the problem was?
What about my old wimpy attempt at a centrist party? Anyone remember the UCMP?
I wanted to get into the coalition, and I even stole a senator from the Liberal Democrats. But alas the UCMP wasn't allowed into the coalition, perhaps they were too right leaning for the likes of the Liberal Democrats and Democratic Left? But now Reform gets in and everyone's like "woo woo they're pragmatic and will aid us in the transition to socialism, yea!"
by Ikania » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:36 pm
New Werpland wrote:Argentarino wrote:Difference is...Reform wanted to be part of a coalition...FDP didn't. See where the problem was?
What about my old wimpy attempt at a centrist party? Anyone remember the UCMP?
I wanted to get into the coalition, and I even stole a senator from the Liberal Democrats. But alas the UCMP wasn't allowed into the coalition, perhaps they were too right leaning for the likes of the Liberal Democrats and Democratic Left? But now Reform gets in and everyone's like "woo woo they're pragmatic and will aid us in the transition to socialism, yea!"
by New Werpland » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:37 pm
Ikania wrote:New Werpland wrote:What about my old wimpy attempt at a centrist party? Anyone remember the UCMP?
I wanted to get into the coalition, and I even stole a senator from the Liberal Democrats. But alas the UCMP wasn't allowed into the coalition, perhaps they were too right leaning for the likes of the Liberal Democrats and Democratic Left? But now Reform gets in and everyone's like "woo woo they're pragmatic and will aid us in the transition to socialism, yea!"
Maybe because your party was comprised of one single member.
by New Werpland » Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:06 pm
Lykens wrote:New Werpland wrote:What about my old wimpy attempt at a centrist party? Anyone remember the UCMP?
I wanted to get into the coalition, and I even stole a senator from the Liberal Democrats. But alas the UCMP wasn't allowed into the coalition, perhaps they were too right leaning for the likes of the Liberal Democrats and Democratic Left? But now Reform gets in and everyone's like "woo woo they're pragmatic and will aid us in the transition to socialism, yea!"
The UCMP was led by you. You are a very politically confused individual.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:04 pm
New Werpland wrote:Lykens wrote:The UCMP was led by you. You are a very politically confused individual.
I briefly played as a crazy Anarcho-Capitalist quickly turned Corporatist Senator and joined Partido Tradicionalista. Besides that I only moved parties three times, once to the UCMP from the Libdems, once from the UCMP back to the Libdems, and last from the LibDems to the Newdems.
by The New Sea Territory » Wed Jun 17, 2015 4:20 pm
Heraklea- wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:"The Alliance seeks not for a violent revolution, but a revolution that is social and economic and in that sense may be classed as revolutionary. We believe in legislating worker’s right to democratic control of their own labour, granting them power over the means of production within an explicitly Socialist economic system. The post-feudal class system that dominates Capitalist societies must be eliminated through the destruction of profit systems and a peaceful assimilation into the Proletariat."
So....what part of the social revolution allows for collaboration with the Reform Party?
We remain a party committed to a gradualistic reform process to achieving social and economic changes we wish to see. The Reform Party, while occupying a quite different ideology, have agreed to work with us to govern this country and try to find the best solutions to the problems we face going forward. There is no sacrifice in principals by working with those who adhere to other ideology, merely recognition that we cannot force the changes we want on society. We must continuously dialogue and educate until finally our people are ready to take the leap and embrace socialist economics fully.
| Ⓐ ☭ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᚨ ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore
by Intermountain States » Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:26 am
New Werpland wrote:Lykens wrote:The UCMP was led by you. You are a very politically confused individual.
I briefly played as a crazy Anarcho-Capitalist quickly turned Corporatist Senator and joined Partido Tradicionalista. Besides that I only moved parties three times, once to the UCMP from the Libdems, once from the UCMP back to the Libdems, and last from the LibDems to the Newdems.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a third party voter. Trust me when I say this: Not even a lifetime supply of tacos could convince me to vote for either Hillary or Trump. I suspect I'm not the only third party voter who feels that way. I cost Hillary nothing. I cost Trump nothing. If I didn't vote for third party, I would have written in 'Batman'.
If you try to blame me, I will laugh in your face. I'm glad she lost. I got half my wish. :)
by New Werpland » Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:42 am
Intermountain States wrote:New Werpland wrote:I briefly played as a crazy Anarcho-Capitalist quickly turned Corporatist Senator and joined Partido Tradicionalista. Besides that I only moved parties three times, once to the UCMP from the Libdems, once from the UCMP back to the Libdems, and last from the LibDems to the Newdems.
You joined Reform for like 3 days (give or take) and then left. I remembered you doing that
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Click Ests Vimgalevytopia
Advertisement