Advertisement

by Malgrave » Tue May 26, 2015 4:10 pm
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

by Britanno 2 » Tue May 26, 2015 4:35 pm

by The Saint James Islands » Tue May 26, 2015 5:26 pm
Classical republican, environmental student
Pro: Parliamentarism, civic virtue, positive liberty, soft Euroscepticism, the scientific method, facts
Anti: Presidentialism, authoritarianism, corruption, populism, hard Euroscepticism, misinformation
IC posts made by this nation are non-canonical.
This nation does not reflect my actual political views.
Do not use orally after using rectally.Guilherme Magalhães
Senator for Ilhas de Santiago Ocidentais
Staunchly independent
[23:53] <StJames> ^fake news^
The death of the West will not be a homicide, but a suicide.
by Ainin » Wed May 27, 2015 4:28 am
First-Past-the-Post Presidential Elections Act
| Author: Senator Desjardins (Ainin) |
| Sponsors: |
An Act to establish a first-past-the-post presidential elections system; and for connected purposes.
§1
(1) Section 2.2 of the Elections Act is struck out and rendered null and void.
(2) A two-round first-past-the-post system shall be used for presidential elections.

by Arkolon » Wed May 27, 2015 4:30 am
Ainin wrote:First-Past-the-Post Presidential Elections Act
| Author: Senator Desjardins (Ainin) |
| Sponsors: |
An Act to establish a first-past-the-post presidential elections system; and for connected purposes.
§1
(1) Section 2.2 of the Elections Act is struck out and rendered null and void.
(2) A two-round first-past-the-post system shall be used for presidential elections.

by Electrum » Wed May 27, 2015 5:11 am

by Britanno 2 » Wed May 27, 2015 5:46 am
Electrum wrote:No.
This will mean we will have to hold another election. Wasting money and time, even though it can be done in one count under the current system with the exact same outcome.

by Heraklea- » Wed May 27, 2015 5:53 am
Britanno 2 wrote:Electrum wrote:No.
This will mean we will have to hold another election. Wasting money and time, even though it can be done in one count under the current system with the exact same outcome.
I'm sorry, but this system is confusing as fuck when trying to count votes. FPTP is much easier.
Also, we should have presidential elections every two months and reduce the PM term back to one month like when we started out. It boosts activity.

by The Sarian » Wed May 27, 2015 6:17 am
Britanno 2 wrote:Electrum wrote:No.
This will mean we will have to hold another election. Wasting money and time, even though it can be done in one count under the current system with the exact same outcome.
I'm sorry, but this system is confusing as fuck when trying to count votes. FPTP is much easier.
Also, we should have presidential elections every two months and reduce the PM term back to one month like when we started out. It boosts activity.

by New Werpland » Wed May 27, 2015 6:49 am

by Lykens » Wed May 27, 2015 7:16 am
New Werpland wrote:I rescind my sponsorship

by New Werpland » Wed May 27, 2015 7:27 am

by Lykens » Wed May 27, 2015 7:31 am

by New Werpland » Wed May 27, 2015 7:34 am

by Lykens » Wed May 27, 2015 7:44 am

by Collatis » Wed May 27, 2015 8:20 am
New Werpland wrote:Your leftist legislation.
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by Britanno 2 » Wed May 27, 2015 8:43 am
Heraklea- wrote:It's really quite simple. You rank the candidates in order of preference. Whoever gets ranked 1 on your ballot initially gets your vote. If no one has a majority at that point, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated. The votes awarded to that candidate are redistributed according to who is the next preferred candidate on that ballot. If a ballot has no further ranked candidates, then it is removed from the count. The process is repeated until a candidate has a majority of the votes and they are declared the elected winner.
The Sarian wrote:It's not that complicated, I've got a spreadsheet working it out for me.

by Lykens » Wed May 27, 2015 8:57 am

by The Sarian » Wed May 27, 2015 9:01 am
Britanno 2 wrote:Heraklea- wrote:It's really quite simple. You rank the candidates in order of preference. Whoever gets ranked 1 on your ballot initially gets your vote. If no one has a majority at that point, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated. The votes awarded to that candidate are redistributed according to who is the next preferred candidate on that ballot. If a ballot has no further ranked candidates, then it is removed from the count. The process is repeated until a candidate has a majority of the votes and they are declared the elected winner.The Sarian wrote:It's not that complicated, I've got a spreadsheet working it out for me.
I do know how AV works guys, but what I'm saying is that it is too complicated to count and I see no advantage over a two round system.

by New Werpland » Wed May 27, 2015 9:07 am

by The Sarian » Wed May 27, 2015 9:10 am

by Intermountain States » Wed May 27, 2015 9:16 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a third party voter. Trust me when I say this: Not even a lifetime supply of tacos could convince me to vote for either Hillary or Trump. I suspect I'm not the only third party voter who feels that way. I cost Hillary nothing. I cost Trump nothing. If I didn't vote for third party, I would have written in 'Batman'.
If you try to blame me, I will laugh in your face. I'm glad she lost. I got half my wish. :)

by Britanno 2 » Wed May 27, 2015 9:27 am
Lykens wrote:Good thing you aren't an admin counting?

by Nurkama » Wed May 27, 2015 9:58 am
Ainin wrote:First-Past-the-Post Presidential Elections Act
| Author: Senator Desjardins (Ainin) |
| Sponsors: |
An Act to establish a first-past-the-post presidential elections system; and for connected purposes.
§1
(1) Section 2.2 of the Elections Act is struck out and rendered null and void.
(2) A two-round first-past-the-post system shall be used for presidential elections.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement