NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Coffee Shop: We don't serve decaf

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:37 pm

On Sexual Exploitation of Children
| Author: Senator Kyle Estévez (FDP) |

An act to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of children.



Chapter I - Definitions


• An "internet session" means a period of time during which an internet user, using a specific internet protocol address, visits or is logged into an internet site for an uninterrupted period of time.
• To "photograph" means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape. A "photograph" means anything tangible or intangible produced by photographing.
• "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated:
i) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals;
ii) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object;
iii) Masturbation;
iv) Sadomasochistic abuse;
v) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer;
vi) Depiction of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer. For these purposes, it is not necessary that the minor know that he or she is participating in the described conduct, or any aspect of it;
vii) Touching of a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or breast area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
• "Minor" means any person under eighteen years of age.
• "Live performance" means any play, show, skit, dance, or other exhibition performed or presented to or before an audience of one or more, with or without consideration.


Chapter II - Legal Intent


The legislature finds that the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance. The care of children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek commercial gain or personal gratification based on the exploitation of children.

The legislature further finds that the protection of children from sexual exploitation can be accomplished without infringing on a constitutionally protected activity. The definition of "sexually explicit conduct" and other operative definitions demarcate a line between protected and prohibited conduct and should not inhibit legitimate scientific, medical, or educational activities. The legislature also further finds that children engaged in sexual conduct for financial compensation are frequently the victims of sexual abuse. It is the intent of the legislature to encourage these children to engage in prevention and intervention services and to hold those who pay to engage in the sexual abuse of children accountable for the trauma they inflict on children.

The legislature further finds that due to the changing nature of technology, offenders are now able to access child pornography in different ways and in increasing quantities. It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that the intentional viewing of and dealing in child pornography over the internet is subject to a criminal penalty without limiting the scope of existing prohibitions on the possession of or dealing in child pornography, including the possession of electronic depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It is the intent of the legislature to set a different unit of prosecution for the new offense of viewing of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct such that each separate session of intentionally viewing over the internet of visual depictions or images of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes an offense. The importance of protecting children from repeat exploitation in child pornography is based upon the following findings:

(1) Child pornography is not entitled to protection and thus may be prohibited;

(2) The state has a compelling interest in protecting children from those who sexually exploit them, and this interest extends to stamping out the vice of child pornography at all levels in the distribution chain;

(3) Every instance of viewing images of child pornography represents a renewed violation of the privacy of the victims and a repetition of their abuse;

(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

Chapter III - Elements of crime


(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:

(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;

(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or

(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.

2)(a) A person commits the crime of sending or bringing into the state depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, a visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(b) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each depiction or image of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(c) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each incident of sending or bringing into the state one or more depictions or images of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(3) A person who intentionally views over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct is guilty of viewing depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree.

(4) For the purposes of determining whether a person intentionally viewed over the internet a visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the trier of fact shall consider the title, text, and content of the visual or printed matter, as well as the internet history, search terms, thumbnail images, downloading activity, expert computer forensic testimony, number of visual or printed matter depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, defendant's access to and control over the electronic device and its contents upon which the visual or printed matter was found, or any other relevant evidence. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the viewing was initiated by the user of the computer where the viewing occurred.

(5) For the purposes of this section, each separate internet session of intentionally viewing over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes a separate offense.

(6) A person is guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor if:

(a) He or she pays a fee to a minor or a third person as compensation for a minor having engaged in sexual conduct with him or her;

(b) He or she pays or agrees to pay a fee to a minor or a third person pursuant to an understanding that in return therefore such minor will engage in sexual conduct with him or her; or

(c) He or she solicits, offers, or requests to engage in sexual conduct with a minor in return for a fee.

(7) In addition to any other penalty, a person guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor is subject to any pertinent provisions.

(8) Consent of a minor to the sexual conduct does not constitute a defense to any offense listed in this section.

(9) No person may knowingly allow a minor to be on the premises of a commercial establishment open to the public if there is a live performance containing matter which is erotic material.

(10) Any person who is convicted of violating this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

(11) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:

(i) Which the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, when considered as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and

(ii) Which explicitly depicts or describes patently offensive representations or descriptions of sexually explicit conduct; and

(iii) Which, when considered as a whole, and in the context in which it is used, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity.


Isn't this a touchy subject... :P
Last edited by Stomalia on Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:44 pm

Stomalia wrote:
--Snip--


Isn't this a touchy subject... :P


"Yeah, sounds good. Hopefully this is just a precaution."
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:52 pm

(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

This seems to amount to denying the defence access to evidence, as such would make the law questionable at best. You can't withhold evidence in a criminal trial from the defence if you are committed to giving people the right to a fair trial.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Heraklea-
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Jun 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Heraklea- » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:55 pm

Stomalia wrote:
On Sexual Exploitation of Children
| Author: Senator Kyle Estévez (FDP) |

An act to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of children.



Chapter I - Definitions


• An "internet session" means a period of time during which an internet user, using a specific internet protocol address, visits or is logged into an internet site for an uninterrupted period of time.
• To "photograph" means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape. A "photograph" means anything tangible or intangible produced by photographing.
• "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated:
i) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals;
ii) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object;
iii) Masturbation;
iv) Sadomasochistic abuse;
v) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer;
vi) Depiction of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer. For these purposes, it is not necessary that the minor know that he or she is participating in the described conduct, or any aspect of it;
vii) Touching of a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or breast area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
• "Minor" means any person under eighteen years of age.
• "Live performance" means any play, show, skit, dance, or other exhibition performed or presented to or before an audience of one or more, with or without consideration.


Chapter II - Legal Intent


The legislature finds that the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance. The care of children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek commercial gain or personal gratification based on the exploitation of children.

The legislature further finds that the protection of children from sexual exploitation can be accomplished without infringing on a constitutionally protected activity. The definition of "sexually explicit conduct" and other operative definitions demarcate a line between protected and prohibited conduct and should not inhibit legitimate scientific, medical, or educational activities. The legislature also further finds that children engaged in sexual conduct for financial compensation are frequently the victims of sexual abuse. It is the intent of the legislature to encourage these children to engage in prevention and intervention services and to hold those who pay to engage in the sexual abuse of children accountable for the trauma they inflict on children.

The legislature further finds that due to the changing nature of technology, offenders are now able to access child pornography in different ways and in increasing quantities. It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that the intentional viewing of and dealing in child pornography over the internet is subject to a criminal penalty without limiting the scope of existing prohibitions on the possession of or dealing in child pornography, including the possession of electronic depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It is the intent of the legislature to set a different unit of prosecution for the new offense of viewing of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct such that each separate session of intentionally viewing over the internet of visual depictions or images of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes an offense. The importance of protecting children from repeat exploitation in child pornography is based upon the following findings:

(1) Child pornography is not entitled to protection and thus may be prohibited;

(2) The state has a compelling interest in protecting children from those who sexually exploit them, and this interest extends to stamping out the vice of child pornography at all levels in the distribution chain;

(3) Every instance of viewing images of child pornography represents a renewed violation of the privacy of the victims and a repetition of their abuse;

(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

Chapter III - Elements of crime


(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:

(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;

(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or

(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.

2)(a) A person commits the crime of sending or bringing into the state depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, a visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(b) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each depiction or image of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(c) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each incident of sending or bringing into the state one or more depictions or images of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(3) A person who intentionally views over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct is guilty of viewing depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree.

(4) For the purposes of determining whether a person intentionally viewed over the internet a visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the trier of fact shall consider the title, text, and content of the visual or printed matter, as well as the internet history, search terms, thumbnail images, downloading activity, expert computer forensic testimony, number of visual or printed matter depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, defendant's access to and control over the electronic device and its contents upon which the visual or printed matter was found, or any other relevant evidence. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the viewing was initiated by the user of the computer where the viewing occurred.

(5) For the purposes of this section, each separate internet session of intentionally viewing over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes a separate offense.

(6) A person is guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor if:

(a) He or she pays a fee to a minor or a third person as compensation for a minor having engaged in sexual conduct with him or her;

(b) He or she pays or agrees to pay a fee to a minor or a third person pursuant to an understanding that in return therefore such minor will engage in sexual conduct with him or her; or

(c) He or she solicits, offers, or requests to engage in sexual conduct with a minor in return for a fee.

(7) In addition to any other penalty, a person guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor is subject to any pertinent provisions.

(8) Consent of a minor to the sexual conduct does not constitute a defense to any offense listed in this section.

(9) No person may knowingly allow a minor to be on the premises of a commercial establishment open to the public if there is a live performance containing matter which is erotic material.

(10) Any person who is convicted of violating this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

(11) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:

(i) Which the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, when considered as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and

(ii) Which explicitly depicts or describes patently offensive representations or descriptions of sexually explicit conduct; and

(iii) Which, when considered as a whole, and in the context in which it is used, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity.


Isn't this a touchy subject... :P

I'm supportive, but I feel this needs to be touched up a bit to have it in proper legalese. That and I would like some statutory rape language (including a three year Romeo-Juliet clause) and actual maximum sentences for the crimes listed therein.

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:58 pm

Senator Johnson has a point. There has to be a way to balance this.
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:59 pm

"How do we deal with a minor intentionally looking at pornographic images of a minor? For example, two minors both under 18, who had 'sexted' one another?"
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:02 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:"How do we deal with a minor intentionally looking at pornographic images of a minor? For example, two minors both under 18, who had 'sexted' one another?"


"In my opinion, we handle it later. We don't want this bill to go down because of a more controversial point like that."
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:06 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

This seems to amount to denying the defence access to evidence, as such would make the law questionable at best. You can't withhold evidence in a criminal trial from the defence if you are commuted to giving people the right to a fair trial.


Hmm... I see your perspective. What do you wish to see this changed to?

Heraklea- wrote:
Stomalia wrote:
On Sexual Exploitation of Children
| Author: Senator Kyle Estévez (FDP) |

An act to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of children.



Chapter I - Definitions


• An "internet session" means a period of time during which an internet user, using a specific internet protocol address, visits or is logged into an internet site for an uninterrupted period of time.
• To "photograph" means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape. A "photograph" means anything tangible or intangible produced by photographing.
• "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated:
i) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals;
ii) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object;
iii) Masturbation;
iv) Sadomasochistic abuse;
v) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer;
vi) Depiction of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer. For these purposes, it is not necessary that the minor know that he or she is participating in the described conduct, or any aspect of it;
vii) Touching of a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or breast area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
• "Minor" means any person under eighteen years of age.
• "Live performance" means any play, show, skit, dance, or other exhibition performed or presented to or before an audience of one or more, with or without consideration.


Chapter II - Legal Intent


The legislature finds that the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance. The care of children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek commercial gain or personal gratification based on the exploitation of children.

The legislature further finds that the protection of children from sexual exploitation can be accomplished without infringing on a constitutionally protected activity. The definition of "sexually explicit conduct" and other operative definitions demarcate a line between protected and prohibited conduct and should not inhibit legitimate scientific, medical, or educational activities. The legislature also further finds that children engaged in sexual conduct for financial compensation are frequently the victims of sexual abuse. It is the intent of the legislature to encourage these children to engage in prevention and intervention services and to hold those who pay to engage in the sexual abuse of children accountable for the trauma they inflict on children.

The legislature further finds that due to the changing nature of technology, offenders are now able to access child pornography in different ways and in increasing quantities. It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that the intentional viewing of and dealing in child pornography over the internet is subject to a criminal penalty without limiting the scope of existing prohibitions on the possession of or dealing in child pornography, including the possession of electronic depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It is the intent of the legislature to set a different unit of prosecution for the new offense of viewing of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct such that each separate session of intentionally viewing over the internet of visual depictions or images of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes an offense. The importance of protecting children from repeat exploitation in child pornography is based upon the following findings:

(1) Child pornography is not entitled to protection and thus may be prohibited;

(2) The state has a compelling interest in protecting children from those who sexually exploit them, and this interest extends to stamping out the vice of child pornography at all levels in the distribution chain;

(3) Every instance of viewing images of child pornography represents a renewed violation of the privacy of the victims and a repetition of their abuse;

(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

Chapter III - Elements of crime


(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:

(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;

(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or

(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.

2)(a) A person commits the crime of sending or bringing into the state depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, a visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(b) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each depiction or image of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(c) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each incident of sending or bringing into the state one or more depictions or images of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(3) A person who intentionally views over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct is guilty of viewing depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree.

(4) For the purposes of determining whether a person intentionally viewed over the internet a visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the trier of fact shall consider the title, text, and content of the visual or printed matter, as well as the internet history, search terms, thumbnail images, downloading activity, expert computer forensic testimony, number of visual or printed matter depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, defendant's access to and control over the electronic device and its contents upon which the visual or printed matter was found, or any other relevant evidence. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the viewing was initiated by the user of the computer where the viewing occurred.

(5) For the purposes of this section, each separate internet session of intentionally viewing over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes a separate offense.

(6) A person is guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor if:

(a) He or she pays a fee to a minor or a third person as compensation for a minor having engaged in sexual conduct with him or her;

(b) He or she pays or agrees to pay a fee to a minor or a third person pursuant to an understanding that in return therefore such minor will engage in sexual conduct with him or her; or

(c) He or she solicits, offers, or requests to engage in sexual conduct with a minor in return for a fee.

(7) In addition to any other penalty, a person guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor is subject to any pertinent provisions.

(8) Consent of a minor to the sexual conduct does not constitute a defense to any offense listed in this section.

(9) No person may knowingly allow a minor to be on the premises of a commercial establishment open to the public if there is a live performance containing matter which is erotic material.

(10) Any person who is convicted of violating this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

(11) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:

(i) Which the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, when considered as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and

(ii) Which explicitly depicts or describes patently offensive representations or descriptions of sexually explicit conduct; and

(iii) Which, when considered as a whole, and in the context in which it is used, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity.


Isn't this a touchy subject... :P

I'm supportive, but I feel this needs to be touched up a bit to have it in proper legalese. That and I would like some statutory rape language (including a three year Romeo-Juliet clause) and actual maximum sentences for the crimes listed therein.


I will work on it.

Atlanticatia wrote:"How do we deal with a minor intentionally looking at pornographic images of a minor? For example, two minors both under 18, who had 'sexted' one another?"


I believe that should be addressed in a different bill.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:10 pm

Stomalia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:(4) Child pornography constitutes prima facie contraband, and as such should not be distributed to, or copied by, child pornography defendants or their attorneys;

This seems to amount to denying the defence access to evidence, as such would make the law questionable at best. You can't withhold evidence in a criminal trial from the defence if you are commuted to giving people the right to a fair trial.


Hmm... I see your perspective. What do you wish to see this changed to?



Nothing, remove it. One either lets the defence have access to the evidence or one doesn't. There is no halfway house. The rest of the bill protects it anyway as if the evidence is sent anywhere that's not to do with the case involved it would be a crime.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:12 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Stomalia wrote:
Hmm... I see your perspective. What do you wish to see this changed to?



Nothing, remove it. One either lets the defence have access to the evidence or one doesn't. There is no halfway house. The rest of the bill protects it anyway as if the evidence is sent anywhere that's not to do with the case involved it would be a crime.


Ah, I understand and agree. I will remove it.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:13 pm

On Sexual Exploitation of Children
| Author: Senator Kyle Estévez (FDP) |

An act to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of children.



Chapter I - Definitions


• An "internet session" means a period of time during which an internet user, using a specific internet protocol address, visits or is logged into an internet site for an uninterrupted period of time.
• To "photograph" means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape. A "photograph" means anything tangible or intangible produced by photographing.
• "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated:
i) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals;
ii) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object;
iii) Masturbation;
iv) Sadomasochistic abuse;
v) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer;
vi) Depiction of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer. For these purposes, it is not necessary that the minor know that he or she is participating in the described conduct, or any aspect of it;
vii) Touching of a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or breast area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
• "Minor" means any person under eighteen years of age.
• "Live performance" means any play, show, skit, dance, or other exhibition performed or presented to or before an audience of one or more, with or without consideration.


Chapter II - Legal Intent


The legislature finds that the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance. The care of children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek commercial gain or personal gratification based on the exploitation of children.

The legislature further finds that the protection of children from sexual exploitation can be accomplished without infringing on a constitutionally protected activity. The definition of "sexually explicit conduct" and other operative definitions demarcate a line between protected and prohibited conduct and should not inhibit legitimate scientific, medical, or educational activities. The legislature also further finds that children engaged in sexual conduct for financial compensation are frequently the victims of sexual abuse. It is the intent of the legislature to encourage these children to engage in prevention and intervention services and to hold those who pay to engage in the sexual abuse of children accountable for the trauma they inflict on children.

The legislature further finds that due to the changing nature of technology, offenders are now able to access child pornography in different ways and in increasing quantities. It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that the intentional viewing of and dealing in child pornography over the internet is subject to a criminal penalty without limiting the scope of existing prohibitions on the possession of or dealing in child pornography, including the possession of electronic depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It is the intent of the legislature to set a different unit of prosecution for the new offense of viewing of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct such that each separate session of intentionally viewing over the internet of visual depictions or images of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes an offense. The importance of protecting children from repeat exploitation in child pornography is based upon the following findings:

(1) Child pornography is not entitled to protection and thus may be prohibited;

(2) The state has a compelling interest in protecting children from those who sexually exploit them, and this interest extends to stamping out the vice of child pornography at all levels in the distribution chain;

(3) Every instance of viewing images of child pornography represents a renewed violation of the privacy of the victims and a repetition of their abuse.

Chapter III - Elements of crime


(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:

(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;

(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or

(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.

2)(a) A person commits the crime of sending or bringing into the state depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, a visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(b) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each depiction or image of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(c) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each incident of sending or bringing into the state one or more depictions or images of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(3) A person who intentionally views over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct is guilty of viewing depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree.

(4) For the purposes of determining whether a person intentionally viewed over the internet a visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the trier of fact shall consider the title, text, and content of the visual or printed matter, as well as the internet history, search terms, thumbnail images, downloading activity, expert computer forensic testimony, number of visual or printed matter depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, defendant's access to and control over the electronic device and its contents upon which the visual or printed matter was found, or any other relevant evidence. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the viewing was initiated by the user of the computer where the viewing occurred.

(5) For the purposes of this section, each separate internet session of intentionally viewing over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes a separate offense.

(6) A person is guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor if:

(a) He or she pays a fee to a minor or a third person as compensation for a minor having engaged in sexual conduct with him or her;

(b) He or she pays or agrees to pay a fee to a minor or a third person pursuant to an understanding that in return therefore such minor will engage in sexual conduct with him or her; or

(c) He or she solicits, offers, or requests to engage in sexual conduct with a minor in return for a fee.

(7) In addition to any other penalty, a person guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor is subject to any pertinent provisions.

(8) Consent of a minor to the sexual conduct does not constitute a defense to any offense listed in this section.

(9) No person may knowingly allow a minor to be on the premises of a commercial establishment open to the public if there is a live performance containing matter which is erotic material.

(10) Any person who is convicted of violating this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

(11) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:

(i) Which the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, when considered as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and

(ii) Which explicitly depicts or describes patently offensive representations or descriptions of sexually explicit conduct; and

(iii) Which, when considered as a whole, and in the context in which it is used, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity.
Last edited by Stomalia on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:16 pm

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:


This is odd. I can't find this phrase used anywhere else in the legislation.
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
Heraklea-
Diplomat
 
Posts: 948
Founded: Jun 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Heraklea- » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:17 pm

Alyekra wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:"How do we deal with a minor intentionally looking at pornographic images of a minor? For example, two minors both under 18, who had 'sexted' one another?"


"In my opinion, we handle it later. We don't want this bill to go down because of a more controversial point like that."

I concur, though this does highlight the need for legislation pertaining to crimes committed by those not considered legally competent, such as children.

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:18 pm

Here is my Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act. The only things included are what I currently wish to change(income tax rates/corporate tax rates)

Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act



original Author: Sen. Sebastián Luc Morales (Atlanticatia | DemLeft)
amendment Author: Senator Balthazar Abaroa (LibDem)
§ 1 - Personal Income Tax

a) The personal income tax shall be levied on all 'taxable income' of individuals at the following marginal rates:
    Taxable income between $0-$8,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 0%
    Taxable income between $8,001-$15,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 10%
    Taxable income between $15,001-$25,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 15%
    Taxable income between $25,001-$40,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 20%
    Taxable income between $40,001-$50,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 26%
    Taxable income between $50,001-$60,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 30%
    Taxable income between $60,001-$80,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 34%
    Taxable income between $80,001-$100,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 40%
    Taxable income between $100,000-$200,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 50%
    Taxable income above $200,000 per annum shall be taxed at 60%



§ 3 - Corporate Tax
a) Corporate tax shall be levied on all worldwide corporate profits, the rate of taxation will be a flat 15%
Last edited by New Werpland on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:20 pm

Alyekra wrote:
(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:


This is odd. I can't find this phrase used anywhere else in the legislation.


Really? I'm sure I mentioned the erotic dances in there...let me check.

EDIT: The term is used in Chapter III, Section 9.
Last edited by Stomalia on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
Lykens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lykens » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:20 pm

.
Last edited by Lykens on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Looking for a decent RP region to join? Try Greater Olympus.

Good people, Active RPs, Great Maps.

Greater Olympus is always looking for more dastardly democracies, maniacal monarchies, contemptible commies, and glorious failed states of all sizes to join our group!

User avatar
Alyekra
Minister
 
Posts: 2828
Founded: May 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alyekra » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:24 pm

Stomalia wrote:
Alyekra wrote:
This is odd. I can't find this phrase used anywhere else in the legislation.


Really? I'm sure I mentioned the erotic dances in there...let me check.

EDIT: The term is used in Chapter III, Section 9.


I see. Thank you.

I believe section nine is sufficient on its' own.
(FOR LEGAL REASONS, THAT'S A JOKE)

65 dkp

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:28 pm

Lykens wrote:.


If you don't mind me asking, why did you edit your post to become "."? Did you not portray the amendment passing process correctly, I never was told to consult the finance minister or president when I asked Battlion how I should go about making an amendment, I'm assuming you made a mistake there.
Last edited by New Werpland on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lykens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lykens » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:28 pm

New Werpland wrote:
Lykens wrote:.


If you don't mind me asking, why did you edit your post to become "."? Did you not portray the amendment passing process correctly, I never was told to consult the finance minister or president when I asked Battlion how I should go about making an amendment.

You did something wrong with the tags, and when I quoted it, it messed up the thread.
Looking for a decent RP region to join? Try Greater Olympus.

Good people, Active RPs, Great Maps.

Greater Olympus is always looking for more dastardly democracies, maniacal monarchies, contemptible commies, and glorious failed states of all sizes to join our group!

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:29 pm

Lykens wrote:
New Werpland wrote:
If you don't mind me asking, why did you edit your post to become "."? Did you not portray the amendment passing process correctly, I never was told to ask the finance minister or president when I asked Battlion how I should go about making an amendment.

You did something wrong with the tags, and when I quoted it, it messed up the thread.

Yes I noticed something wrong with that when I was trying to reply to you originally, how can I fix this?
Last edited by New Werpland on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Lykens
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lykens » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:32 pm

New Werpland wrote:
Lykens wrote:You did something wrong with the tags, and when I quoted it, it messed up the thread.

Yes I noticed something wrong with that when I was trying to reply to you originally, how can I fix this?

Most of us use this.

Code: Select all
[box][hr][/hr][align=center][size=150][b]Title[/b][/size][/align]
[b]Author[/b]:
[b]Sponsors[/b]:
[i]Description or preambulatory clauses.[/i][hr][/hr]
[b]Section 1: Definitions[/b]
[blocktext][i]Term-[/i] definition
[i]Term-[/i] definition[/blocktext]
[b]Section 2:[/b]
[blocktext]Text.[/blocktext]
[b]Section 3:[/b]
[blocktext][list]1)   who
2)   is
3)   john
4)   galt[/list][/blocktext]
[b]Section 4:[/b]
[blocktext]text[/blocktext]
[b]Section 5: Effective[/b]
[blocktext]text[/blocktext][/box]
Looking for a decent RP region to join? Try Greater Olympus.

Good people, Active RPs, Great Maps.

Greater Olympus is always looking for more dastardly democracies, maniacal monarchies, contemptible commies, and glorious failed states of all sizes to join our group!

User avatar
New Werpland
Senator
 
Posts: 4647
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Werpland » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:34 pm

Lykens wrote:
New Werpland wrote:Yes I noticed something wrong with that when I was trying to reply to you originally, how can I fix this?

Most of us use this.

Code: Select all
[box][hr][/hr][align=center][size=150][b]Title[/b][/size][/align]
[b]Author[/b]:
[b]Sponsors[/b]:
[i]Description or preambulatory clauses.[/i][hr][/hr]
[b]Section 1: Definitions[/b]
[blocktext][i]Term-[/i] definition
[i]Term-[/i] definition[/blocktext]
[b]Section 2:[/b]
[blocktext]Text.[/blocktext]
[b]Section 3:[/b]
[blocktext][list]1)   who
2)   is
3)   john
4)   galt[/list][/blocktext]
[b]Section 4:[/b]
[blocktext]text[/blocktext]
[b]Section 5: Effective[/b]
[blocktext]text[/blocktext][/box]


aha, sorry about that.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:35 pm

New Werpland wrote:Here is my Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act. The only things included are what I currently wish to change(income tax rates/corporate tax rates)

Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act



original Author: Sen. Sebastián Luc Morales (Atlanticatia | DemLeft)
amendment Author: Senator Balthazar Abaroa (LibDem)
§ 1 - Personal Income Tax

a) The personal income tax shall be levied on all 'taxable income' of individuals at the following marginal rates:
    Taxable income between $0-$8,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 0%
    Taxable income between $8,001-$15,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 10%
    Taxable income between $15,001-$25,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 15%
    Taxable income between $25,001-$40,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 20%
    Taxable income between $40,001-$50,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 26%
    Taxable income between $50,001-$60,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 30%
    Taxable income between $60,001-$80,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 34%
    Taxable income between $80,001-$100,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 40%
    Taxable income between $100,000-$200,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 50%
    Taxable income above $200,000 per annum shall be taxed at 60%



§ 3 - Corporate Tax
a) Corporate tax shall be levied on all worldwide corporate profits, the rate of taxation will be a flat 15%


You put the box outside the spoiler.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Stomalia
Minister
 
Posts: 2883
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stomalia » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:36 pm

On Sexual Exploitation of Children
| Author: Senator Kyle Estévez (FDP) |
| Sponsors: Matilde Ojeda Campos (FDP), Simón Parrino (FDP)

An act to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of children.



Chapter I - Definitions


• An "internet session" means a period of time during which an internet user, using a specific internet protocol address, visits or is logged into an internet site for an uninterrupted period of time.
• To "photograph" means to make a print, negative, slide, digital image, motion picture, or videotape. A "photograph" means anything tangible or intangible produced by photographing.
• "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated:
i) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between humans and animals;
ii) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object;
iii) Masturbation;
iv) Sadomasochistic abuse;
v) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer;
vi) Depiction of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer. For these purposes, it is not necessary that the minor know that he or she is participating in the described conduct, or any aspect of it;
vii) Touching of a person's clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or breast area for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
• "Minor" means any person under eighteen years of age.
• "Live performance" means any play, show, skit, dance, or other exhibition performed or presented to or before an audience of one or more, with or without consideration.


Chapter II - Legal Intent


The legislature finds that the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance. The care of children is a sacred trust and should not be abused by those who seek commercial gain or personal gratification based on the exploitation of children.

The legislature further finds that the protection of children from sexual exploitation can be accomplished without infringing on a constitutionally protected activity. The definition of "sexually explicit conduct" and other operative definitions demarcate a line between protected and prohibited conduct and should not inhibit legitimate scientific, medical, or educational activities. The legislature also further finds that children engaged in sexual conduct for financial compensation are frequently the victims of sexual abuse. It is the intent of the legislature to encourage these children to engage in prevention and intervention services and to hold those who pay to engage in the sexual abuse of children accountable for the trauma they inflict on children.

The legislature further finds that due to the changing nature of technology, offenders are now able to access child pornography in different ways and in increasing quantities. It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that the intentional viewing of and dealing in child pornography over the internet is subject to a criminal penalty without limiting the scope of existing prohibitions on the possession of or dealing in child pornography, including the possession of electronic depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. It is the intent of the legislature to set a different unit of prosecution for the new offense of viewing of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct such that each separate session of intentionally viewing over the internet of visual depictions or images of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes an offense. The importance of protecting children from repeat exploitation in child pornography is based upon the following findings:

(1) Child pornography is not entitled to protection and thus may be prohibited;

(2) The state has a compelling interest in protecting children from those who sexually exploit them, and this interest extends to stamping out the vice of child pornography at all levels in the distribution chain;

(3) Every instance of viewing images of child pornography represents a renewed violation of the privacy of the victims and a repetition of their abuse.

Chapter III - Elements of crime - Penalties


(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:

(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;

(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or

(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.

(d) Sexual exploitation of a minor is a class B felony punishable under Chapter IV.

2)(a) A person commits the crime of sending or bringing into the state depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, a visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(b) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each depiction or image of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(c) For the purposes of determining the unit of prosecution under this subsection, each incident of sending or bringing into the state one or more depictions or images of visual or printed matter constitutes a separate offense.

(3) A person who intentionally views over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct is guilty of viewing depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree.

(4) For the purposes of determining whether a person intentionally viewed over the internet a visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the trier of fact shall consider the title, text, and content of the visual or printed matter, as well as the internet history, search terms, thumbnail images, downloading activity, expert computer forensic testimony, number of visual or printed matter depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, defendant's access to and control over the electronic device and its contents upon which the visual or printed matter was found, or any other relevant evidence. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the viewing was initiated by the user of the computer where the viewing occurred.

(5) For the purposes of this section, each separate internet session of intentionally viewing over the internet visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct constitutes a separate offense.

(6) A person is guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor if:

(a) He or she pays a fee to a minor or a third person as compensation for a minor having engaged in sexual conduct with him or her;

(b) He or she pays or agrees to pay a fee to a minor or a third person pursuant to an understanding that in return therefore such minor will engage in sexual conduct with him or her; or

(c) He or she solicits, offers, or requests to engage in sexual conduct with a minor in return for a fee.

(7) In addition to any other penalty, a person guilty of commercial sexual abuse of a minor is subject to any pertinent provisions.

(8) Consent of a minor to the sexual conduct does not constitute a defense to any offense listed in this section.

(9) No person may knowingly allow a minor to be on the premises of a commercial establishment open to the public if there is a live performance containing matter which is erotic material.

(10) Any person who is convicted of violating this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

(11) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Erotic materials" means live performance:

(i) Which the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, when considered as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and

(ii) Which explicitly depicts or describes patently offensive representations or descriptions of sexually explicit conduct; and

(iii) Which, when considered as a whole, and in the context in which it is used, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity.

Chapter IV - Designation of Crimes


(1) For purposes of sentencing, crimes are designated as one of three classes, as follows:

(i) Class A felony; or

(ii) Class B felony; or

(iii) Class C felony.

(2) Misdemeanors and Gross Misdemeanors. (a) Any crime punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars (USD), or by imprisonment in a jail for not more than ninety days, or by both such fine and imprisonment is a misdemeanor. Whenever the performance of any act is prohibited by any statute, and no penalty for the violation of such statute is imposed, the committing of such act shall be a misdemeanor.

(b) All crimes other than felonies and misdemeanors are gross misdemeanors.
Last edited by Stomalia on Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
I am fluent in English and semi-fluent in Spanish. I want to learn French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Polish, and Russian.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:38 pm

New Werpland wrote:Here is my Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act. The only things included are what I currently wish to change(income tax rates/corporate tax rates)

Amendment to the Primary Revenue Act



original Author: Sen. Sebastián Luc Morales (Atlanticatia | DemLeft)
amendment Author: Senator Balthazar Abaroa (LibDem)
§ 1 - Personal Income Tax

a) The personal income tax shall be levied on all 'taxable income' of individuals at the following marginal rates:
    Taxable income between $0-$8,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 0%
    Taxable income between $8,001-$15,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 10%
    Taxable income between $15,001-$25,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 15%
    Taxable income between $25,001-$40,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 20%
    Taxable income between $40,001-$50,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 26%
    Taxable income between $50,001-$60,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 30%
    Taxable income between $60,001-$80,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 34%
    Taxable income between $80,001-$100,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 40%
    Taxable income between $100,000-$200,000 per annum shall be taxed at: 50%
    Taxable income above $200,000 per annum shall be taxed at 60%



§ 3 - Corporate Tax
a) Corporate tax shall be levied on all worldwide corporate profits, the rate of taxation will be a flat 15%


Hahaha. 60%? No effing way José.
Last edited by The Liberated Territories on Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads