Battlion wrote:I never actually changed that, decided against it...
Parties are the individuals, the couple is obviously both.
The bill does not promote polygamy, to prove the parties point this part of the bill may make it clearer...
"(1) Subject to subsections (1A) and (1B) below, a marriage/partnership between two parties related to them in a degree"
Well in that case, I am opposed and advise any Calaverdean Muslims in good standing are also. This bill is based in Western imperialist ideals and ought to be kept out of the Chamber.




