That's a lot of responsibility.
The biggest thing I am trying to figure out is where contestants can submit their videos. I have the distinct feeling, with some of the entrants, this is not a PG-13 format.
Advertisement

by Grainne Ni Malley » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:22 pm

by Liberbooty » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:23 pm

by Liberbooty » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:24 pm
Other Thafoo wrote:It's all fun and games until someone gets a nacho in the eye.

by DesAnges » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:25 pm

by Esternial » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:25 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:28 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by DesAnges » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:29 pm
Lordieth wrote:Esternial wrote:True. A good-looking gall is quite pleasing for the eyes.
A "you see what you get" kind of art, perhaps. Other kinds of artwork are often more laden with many hidden meanings and themes.
Nothing wrong with being able to appreciate the human form. Not everything has to be about sex.

by Esternial » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:31 pm
Lordieth wrote:Esternial wrote:True. A good-looking gall is quite pleasing for the eyes.
A "you see what you get" kind of art, perhaps. Other kinds of artwork are often more laden with many hidden meanings and themes.
Nothing wrong with being able to appreciate the human form. Not everything has to be about sex.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:33 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Esternial » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:35 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Esternial wrote:True. A good-looking gall is quite pleasing for the eyes.
A "you see what you get" kind of art, perhaps. Other kinds of artwork are often more laden with many hidden meanings and themes.
Either it is WYSIWYG or it is a subtle comment about the architecture of the flesh.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:46 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:58 pm

by DesAnges » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:58 pm

by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:59 pm
DesAnges wrote:This is honestly the deadest I've ever know this at night. Where are the gringos?

by Hladgos » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:59 pm
DesAnges wrote:This is honestly the deadest I've ever know this at night. Where are the gringos?

by DesAnges » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:00 pm

by Hladgos » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:01 pm

by Hladgos » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:07 pm

by Murkwood » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:08 pm
Hladgos wrote:Whoa whoa whoa. Title change is freaking me out, what's going on?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Blazedtown » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:08 pm
Hladgos wrote:Whoa whoa whoa. Title change is freaking me out, what's going on?

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:09 pm
Hladgos wrote:Whoa whoa whoa. Title change is freaking me out, what's going on?
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Hladgos » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement