I don't have any details, that is just what I assumed from posts that I stumbled upon earlier.
Advertisement

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:41 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:41 am
Lordieth wrote:In a bit of quandary. I'm in a job where I know I should be paid more. I work with people who wouldn't like that. I have a boss who, rather than taking the logical option, knowing that keeping me on and paying me more, would make the company more money than if I were replaced, could likely take the path of less resistance and replace me anyway, because it means he can avoid a confrontation with other employees, despite this decision not being in the best interest of the company.
It's infuriating. If I say something it could jeopardise my job, but if I say nothing, my position at the company will never change. The logical option is to use the skills and experience I have to find a better job, but then I risk going into a job I do not enjoy.

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:43 am

by Bunkeranlage » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:45 am
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views

by Lordieth » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:45 am
The Lendol Archipelago wrote:Lordieth wrote:In a bit of quandary. I'm in a job where I know I should be paid more. I work with people who wouldn't like that. I have a boss who, rather than taking the logical option, knowing that keeping me on and paying me more, would make the company more money than if I were replaced, could likely take the path of less resistance and replace me anyway, because it means he can avoid a confrontation with other employees, despite this decision not being in the best interest of the company.
It's infuriating. If I say something it could jeopardise my job, but if I say nothing, my position at the company will never change. The logical option is to use the skills and experience I have to find a better job, but then I risk going into a job I do not enjoy.
This again, I want to say take the risk but I know that it would be different were I in your position. Say something, maybe not overly demanding but lay your cards on the table. Make sure your boss knows that he would be making a mistake losing you.

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:45 am
Lordieth wrote:The Lendol Archipelago wrote:This again, I want to say take the risk but I know that it would be different were I in your position. Say something, maybe not overly demanding but lay your cards on the table. Make sure your boss knows that he would be making a mistake losing you.
Yeah, this again. Well I have the ideal opportunity to say something this week. It's going to be too much hassle for him to replace me right now, so worst case situation, if it doesn't go well, at least I'll have time to find something else if I don't get the right response, and perhaps that wouldn't be such a bad thing. I wouldn't want to work here any more if I'm not going to be paid what I deserve.

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:46 am

by Lordieth » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:47 am
The Lendol Archipelago wrote:Lordieth wrote:
Yeah, this again. Well I have the ideal opportunity to say something this week. It's going to be too much hassle for him to replace me right now, so worst case situation, if it doesn't go well, at least I'll have time to find something else if I don't get the right response, and perhaps that wouldn't be such a bad thing. I wouldn't want to work here any more if I'm not going to be paid what I deserve.
Do you enjoy your current job?

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:47 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:48 am

by Bunkeranlage » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:49 am
Lordieth wrote:Anyway, got to head off. Later, TET.
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:49 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:50 am

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:50 am

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:52 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Lordieth » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:53 am
The Lendol Archipelago wrote:Lordieth wrote:
It's not as challenging as it once was, and the prospects of advancement are looking bleak. I would have to say less and less. Hence my current situation.
So, its not where you would like to be. Take the risk, if it works you'll be happier, if it doesn't you won't have lost anything, if you lose your job over it, which is unlikely, then you've lost a job that you weren't being paid enough and that you weren't enjoying.

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:53 am

by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:54 am
Lordieth wrote:The Lendol Archipelago wrote:So, its not where you would like to be. Take the risk, if it works you'll be happier, if it doesn't you won't have lost anything, if you lose your job over it, which is unlikely, then you've lost a job that you weren't being paid enough and that you weren't enjoying.
Yes. I think the smart thing to do would be to look for work now anyway, and get a head start. I can always turn down job offers if things work out, and if they don't, time to move on.

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:56 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Grenartia » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:02 am

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:03 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Grenartia » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:08 am

by Ionian Knights » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:11 am


by The Lendol Archipelago » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:12 am
Ionian Knights wrote:fucking hell... I want to keep talking to this girl (not Ioc) but I'm afraid I just burned her data up for the month already
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement