Meh, but it's not ranting. It's pretty calm and reserved in some spots.
Advertisement

by Murkwood » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:27 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Torisakia » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:29 am

by The Holy Therns » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:29 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Murkwood » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:31 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:31 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:32 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Torisakia » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:33 am



by Bunkeranlage » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:34 am
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views

by Benshir » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:34 am

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:34 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Murkwood » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:35 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Benshir » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:36 am
Murkwood wrote:Meh, but it's not ranting. It's pretty calm and reserved in some spots.

by Bunkeranlage » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:38 am
Benshir wrote:Bunkeranlage wrote:
Christian here. I can't find any contradictions in it. Care to point out some?
There are websites for that as I do not wish to go on a rant here or dwell too much on the subject (textually speaking, the 4 Gospels aren't all that consistent either), but I'd draw your attention to the difference between Christ's and Paul's stances on faith in practice. There are also instances of incest (the early Patriarchs) and adultery (David), among others.
Whether you wish to view that as proof of the humanity of the divine intervention in the story, or the diversity of those who participated in it, or the scriptures' inconsistency as a whole and its status as a glorified piece of literature, is entirely up to the reader. I won't dictate on believers, skeptics or atheists. I just call it as I read it. Interpretations vary and I respect that.
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views

by Auremena » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:39 am

by Hurdegaryp » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:39 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by The Holy Therns » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:40 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Bunkeranlage » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:40 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Bralia wrote:True. But it certainly inspires people to rant on its behalf.
Like that special snowflake who has been banned from the forum for ten days because of his ceaseless preaching. Pretty sure that Jesus freak actually damaged Christianity in the minds of many, because mechanical dogmatism does that.
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views

by Auremena » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:41 am
I will take it. And then no one will ever get it back, even from my cold dead hands.

by Ethel mermania » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:41 am

by Benshir » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:43 am
Bunkeranlage wrote:My approach to Evangelism is different. I don't believe in mindlessly criticising other religions. Rather, I prefer to just share about Christ, clarify any doubts as well as I can and let the person decide for himself.

by Ionian Knights » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:43 am

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement