Murkwood wrote:Intermountain States wrote:If we want to be in Latin America where most legislators are white, we can claim to be from Argentina
Actually, I like the idea of an independent Araucania and Patagonia. Mainly because it's fun to say.I'm kidding.
Still, it's a good idea. We could pretend Orélie-Antoine I succeeded, and it's either still a Monarchy or transitioned into a Republic sometime during it's history. That would please the White folks, the supporters of Latin America, Monarchists and Republicans, as well as those who want a set in stone origin. Also, there would be no need to create a new map, as we are taking real territory. And since it was only around from 1860-1862 IRL, it would give us a lot of leeway.
Forget about Vestmark; Put me down for team Araucania and Patagonia!
The territory in question: http://www.araucania.org/image005.jpg
I would be open to changing the name to just "Araucania" or "Patagonia", however.





!