NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate General Discussion Thread (Former Lobby)

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:11 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:Am I missing something here? Multi-member districts? What happened to everyone having his own district? MMDs will make drawing a map into pure hell.


Each member has their own constituency, as has always been the case. Districts will contain multiple constituencies.

The purpose they serve being?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:13 pm

Corbins wrote:What'd I miss? :D

Lots of bickering, mainly.
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:13 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:
The New World Oceania wrote:
Each member has their own constituency, as has always been the case. Districts will contain multiple constituencies.

So how does that work? Is it like the US House where every member has a distinct area he/she represents or like the US Senate where there are two members for each state?

I do not support the latter; it will cause unnecessary difficulties in drawing the map and won't really enhance the RP at all as far as I can see. Plus, members always seemed to like having a small piece of land in Aurentina that was theirs and marked in their color on the map. That would be lost in a multi-member district.


It's an electoral college basically. So the chance is the winner of our elections might not have the most votes overall.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Corbins
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Corbins » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:15 pm

Belmaria wrote:
Corbins wrote:What'd I miss? :D

Lots of bickering, mainly.

#NSG
Unapologetic National Socialist
My volk is my faith. My race is my nation.
Bringing the Worker's Dawn
One nation, one people, one dawn.
Our fight against the form of society and of the present state is also a life or death struggle against the SPIRIT of this society, this state : AGAINST LIBERALISM AND FALSE DEMOCRACY!
-Gregor Strasser

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:15 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:So how does that work? Is it like the US House where every member has a distinct area he/she represents or like the US Senate where there are two members for each state?

I do not support the latter; it will cause unnecessary difficulties in drawing the map and won't really enhance the RP at all as far as I can see. Plus, members always seemed to like having a small piece of land in Aurentina that was theirs and marked in their color on the map. That would be lost in a multi-member district.


It's an electoral college basically. So the chance is the winner of our elections might not have the most votes overall.

Political elitism ftw
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:22 pm

Just throwing ideas around here, but what if we took the role as a small nation-state à la San Marino, Monaco, Lichtenstein? Small enough to be unimportant, located conveniently enough to have the culture we could want, and the sheer strength of the EEA and EU around us would mean we get unofficial access to the Euro and the internal market.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:24 pm

Arkolon wrote:Just throwing ideas around here, but what if we took the role as a small nation-state à la San Marino, Monaco, Lichtenstein? Small enough to be unimportant, located conveniently enough to have the culture we could want, and the sheer strength of the EEA and EU around us would mean we get unofficial access to the Euro and the internal market.


ew no
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:27 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Just throwing ideas around here, but what if we took the role as a small nation-state à la San Marino, Monaco, Lichtenstein? Small enough to be unimportant, located conveniently enough to have the culture we could want, and the sheer strength of the EEA and EU around us would mean we get unofficial access to the Euro and the internal market.


ew no

Our own currency for half a million people whilst landlocked on the European continent? That's ew. We could just usurp a slightly larger chunk of land in the same spirit, say, part of Savoy or Venetia/Lombardy, thrown in with funkier and creative bordercrafting. Italy didn't usurp Venetia into itself until five years after the unification of Italy, so it's sort of plausible, right?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
The Union of the West
Minister
 
Posts: 2211
Founded: Jul 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Union of the West » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:29 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:Am I missing something here? Multi-member districts? What happened to everyone having his own district? MMDs will make drawing a map into pure hell.


Each member has their own constituency, as has always been the case. Districts will contain multiple constituencies.

Ahhh, suddenly it all makes sense.
☩ Orthodox Christian ☩
Radical Traditionalist | Philosophical Anarchist | Deep Ecologist
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:31 pm

Arkolon wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
ew no

Our own currency for half a million people whilst landlocked on the European continent? That's ew. We could just usurp a slightly larger chunk of land in the same spirit, say, part of Savoy or Venetia/Lombardy, thrown in with funkier and creative bordercrafting. Italy didn't usurp Venetia into itself until five years after the unification of Italy, so it's sort of plausible, right?


Or be left hostage to a highly unstable fiat currency that has wrecked the Mediterranean?

Perhaps on a utilitarian basis, yes, but I'd wager for economic independence down the road. That's plausible.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:38 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Our own currency for half a million people whilst landlocked on the European continent? That's ew. We could just usurp a slightly larger chunk of land in the same spirit, say, part of Savoy or Venetia/Lombardy, thrown in with funkier and creative bordercrafting. Italy didn't usurp Venetia into itself until five years after the unification of Italy, so it's sort of plausible, right?


Or be left hostage to a highly unstable fiat currency that has wrecked the Mediterranean?

Perhaps on a utilitarian basis, yes, but I'd wager for economic independence down the road. That's plausible.

I firmly agree. The Euro is bad for stability and bad for independence.
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
New Bierstaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 849
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bierstaat » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:40 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:So how does that work? Is it like the US House where every member has a distinct area he/she represents or like the US Senate where there are two members for each state?

I do not support the latter; it will cause unnecessary difficulties in drawing the map and won't really enhance the RP at all as far as I can see. Plus, members always seemed to like having a small piece of land in Aurentina that was theirs and marked in their color on the map. That would be lost in a multi-member district.


It's an electoral college basically. So the chance is the winner of our elections might not have the most votes overall.

So does each senator have his own area of land to represent, or do they share?
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28

Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:56 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
It's an electoral college basically. So the chance is the winner of our elections might not have the most votes overall.

So does each senator have his own area of land to represent, or do they share?


I presume we would have our own constituency.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Dec 03, 2014 5:10 pm

The New World Oceania wrote:Information on which constituencies are in which district are public.

And player is supposed to look through that long list, then at constituency map to find who is in what constituency...

The New World Oceania wrote:People who don't vote aren't counted in the citing of their district's vote. If we wouldn't count it in an at-large election, it wouldn't be counted in the district majority.

Not really my point, players still need to know how their district mates voted (and how they did) to be content with bill being defeated with 55 votes for and 30 against at-large elections.

The New World Oceania wrote:Random number generator is a likely option.

That makes no sense, why would random number rather than shared values be used to determine districts?

The New World Oceania wrote:A vote reads:
I vote Boris Johnson for Glorious Adviser.
Constituency 92/District 2

So additional work for end user... aim should be to reduce that not increase it.

The New World Oceania wrote:Have you considered making more constituencies

Which people loose their influence when that happens? How is it determined?

I still am not seeing how this is anything but more complicated and worse than weighted vote system.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:19 pm

Drop the nastiness or I'll start warning for flaming. This is a general announcement.
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
Finium
Senator
 
Posts: 3849
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Finium » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:24 pm

Maklohi Vai wrote:Drop the nastiness or I'll start warning for flaming. This is a general announcement.

*drops a nasty beat*
big chungus, small among us

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:26 pm

Belmaria wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
Or be left hostage to a highly unstable fiat currency that has wrecked the Mediterranean?

Perhaps on a utilitarian basis, yes, but I'd wager for economic independence down the road. That's plausible.

I firmly agree. The Euro is bad for stability and bad for independence.

And on what economic indicators do you base that the Euro is bad for Stability?
On Greece and its problems? Most countries in the Mediterranean area you talk about are Spain, Italy and Greece. Their problems are not tied to the Euro. They are tied from the Fiscal policy of their governments. Which is the reason why things went downhill for them. Not the Euro.
About the stability it brings i will tell you that most of the countries in the Balkan that is part of the Mediterranean have been Dollarized. It has helped a lot in their stability and in the consumer confidence.
Not to mention independence. The euro only touches in a concept that is called the Monetary Policy. Noting else about independence.
Last edited by Macedonian Grand Empire on Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:30 pm

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
Belmaria wrote:I firmly agree. The Euro is bad for stability and bad for independence.

And on what economic indicators do you base that the Euro is bad for Stability?
On Greece and its problems? Most countries in the Mediterranean area you talk about are Spain, Italy and Greece. Their problems are not tied to the Euro. They are tied from the Fiscal policy of their governments. Which is the reason why things went downhill for them. Not the Euro.
About the stability it brings i will tell you that most of the countries in the Balkan that is part of the Mediterranean have been Dollarized. It has helped a lot in their stability and in the consumer confidence.
Not to mention independence. The euro only touches in a concept that is called the Monetary Policy. Noting else about independence.


The point is having the Euro meant that they could not use monetary policy to get out of the trouble. That made the troubles a number of times worse than they would have been.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31412
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:32 pm

Maklohi Vai wrote:Drop the nastiness or I'll start warning for flaming. This is a general announcement.

If you guys can't cooperate, then what is the point of doing this? The NSG Senate is supposed to be fun and interesting, and yet all you guys are doing is bickering.

I have been meaning to say this for some time now, as the atmosphere in these threads seems really bad.

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:37 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:Drop the nastiness or I'll start warning for flaming. This is a general announcement.

If you guys can't cooperate, then what is the point of doing this? The NSG Senate is supposed to be fun and interesting, and yet all you guys are doing is bickering.

I have been meaning to say this for some time now, as the atmosphere in these threads seems really bad.

On the surface it may look like we hate each other, but in reality we just have strong opinions that we do our best to push across, and sometimes get salty when others don't seem to grasp them. We really are all good at the end of the day. At least I am...
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:39 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:And on what economic indicators do you base that the Euro is bad for Stability?
On Greece and its problems? Most countries in the Mediterranean area you talk about are Spain, Italy and Greece. Their problems are not tied to the Euro. They are tied from the Fiscal policy of their governments. Which is the reason why things went downhill for them. Not the Euro.
About the stability it brings i will tell you that most of the countries in the Balkan that is part of the Mediterranean have been Dollarized. It has helped a lot in their stability and in the consumer confidence.
Not to mention independence. The euro only touches in a concept that is called the Monetary Policy. Noting else about independence.


The point is having the Euro meant that they could not use monetary policy to get out of the trouble. That made the troubles a number of times worse than they would have been.

Monetary policy would not have saved that trouble. It would have created smoother sailing now. The ECB is now doing the same thing that the FED was doing. If the euro did not exist then greece would not have been saved the way it was saved. It would have had to declare bankruptcy whit all the nasty things that would have brought.
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
The Orson Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31412
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Orson Empire » Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:43 pm

Gothmogs wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:If you guys can't cooperate, then what is the point of doing this? The NSG Senate is supposed to be fun and interesting, and yet all you guys are doing is bickering.

I have been meaning to say this for some time now, as the atmosphere in these threads seems really bad.

On the surface it may look like we hate each other, but in reality we just have strong opinions that we do our best to push across, and sometimes get salty when others don't seem to grasp them. We really are all good at the end of the day. At least I am...

I sure hope so, because I don't want to see this crash and burn just because you guys can't cooperate.

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Dec 03, 2014 7:58 pm

Come one, come all, to the Republican Reform Party! We are a centre-right big tent party with an established platform and broad membership! As the largest party currently in the works, if you are looking for a solid home for yourself in the coming senate RP, the Republican Reform Party is your best choice!

FISCAL POLICY
Our party believes in a balanced, reasonable approach to fiscal policy by supporting sound and efficient allocation of taxpayer funds, and a reasonable level of taxation that does not rip the shirts off the backs of our citizens. We also support moderate regulation of industry, but prefer market solutions to problems when they are available. We recognise the importance of the commercial backbone of this country, and believe that we should try to make the business climate as friendly as possible for the industrial growth of our nation.

FOREIGN POLICY
Our party favours peace over war, and prefers to make friends with other nations before becoming enemies with them. However, if a foreign power were to take aggressive actions against our great nation, we would wholly support any effort to defend ourselves and the fine people of our country. We value our military, and are faithful to our allies.

SOCIAL POLICY
As a party, we believe in the sovereignty of every individual, so long as it does not trump the common good of all. While we are secular in nature, we are not totally unopposed to progressive stances on various issues. At the same time, we understand the controversial nature of many social issues. As such, we leave these policies up to our members and our representatives, enforcing no strict consensus onto them.

EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE POLICY
Our party is very proud of our nation’s public education and healthcare systems, and hopes to offer our people the best education and the best healthcare for free. However, simultaneously, we understand the benefits of private education and private healthcare, and wish to offer the nation’s people a choice between public and private services. This type of opportunity for individuals to choose the best option that fits their needs makes our public services more competitive in the face of private establishments, and allows us to maintain a safe, practical, and highly-performing public services system.

CRIME AND JUSTICE POLICY
As a party, we believe in the concept of justice wholeheartedly. As such, we support the allocation of adequate funding to our police service in order to provide them with the tools that they need to help keep us safe. Simultaneously, however, we also believe in accountability. Therefore, we strongly support civil liberties, as well as transparency in our police service. For minor delinquencies, we value rehabilitation over punishment, but we are confident in our stance that very harsh crimes deserve very harsh penalties.

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
We believe that the environment is important. Therefore, our party supports reasonable environmental regulation that protects the people against pollution and “broken cycles” caused by the extinction of a species. However, we believe very strongly that the needs of the economy should be considered equally important as the needs of the environment, and that an equilibrium should be reached in terms of our nation’s environmental policies. We are also a pro-nuclear and thorium party, as nuclear power, and thorium-based nuclear power in particular, is much more cost effective than Wind and Solar energies, without all the pollution associated with fossil fuels. Thorium is an especially fruitful form of energy production, as there is almost zero risk of a nuclear meltdown, unlike traditional uranium/plutonium-based energy production designs.


  • Belmaria (Chairman)
  • Arkolon (Deputy Chairman)
  • New Zepuha (Honorable Member)
  • Finium (Political Affairs Director)
  • Zurkerx (Chief Recruiter)
  • The Liberated Territories (Party Treasurer)
  • Union of the West (Valued Member)
  • The Stern Archipelago (Valued Member)
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Dec 03, 2014 8:00 pm

Belmaria wrote:Come one, come all, to the Republican Reform Party! We are a centre-right big tent party with an established platform and broad membership! As the largest party currently in the works, if you are looking for a solid home for yourself in the coming senate RP, the Republican Reform Party is your best choice!

FISCAL POLICY
Our party believes in a balanced, reasonable approach to fiscal policy by supporting sound and efficient allocation of taxpayer funds, and a reasonable level of taxation that does not rip the shirts off the backs of our citizens. We also support moderate regulation of industry, but prefer market solutions to problems when they are available. We recognise the importance of the commercial backbone of this country, and believe that we should try to make the business climate as friendly as possible for the industrial growth of our nation.

FOREIGN POLICY
Our party favours peace over war, and prefers to make friends with other nations before becoming enemies with them. However, if a foreign power were to take aggressive actions against our great nation, we would wholly support any effort to defend ourselves and the fine people of our country. We value our military, and are faithful to our allies.

SOCIAL POLICY
As a party, we believe in the sovereignty of every individual, so long as it does not trump the common good of all. While we are secular in nature, we are not totally unopposed to progressive stances on various issues. At the same time, we understand the controversial nature of many social issues. As such, we leave these policies up to our members and our representatives, enforcing no strict consensus onto them.

EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE POLICY
Our party is very proud of our nation’s public education and healthcare systems, and hopes to offer our people the best education and the best healthcare for free. However, simultaneously, we understand the benefits of private education and private healthcare, and wish to offer the nation’s people a choice between public and private services. This type of opportunity for individuals to choose the best option that fits their needs makes our public services more competitive in the face of private establishments, and allows us to maintain a safe, practical, and highly-performing public services system.

CRIME AND JUSTICE POLICY
As a party, we believe in the concept of justice wholeheartedly. As such, we support the allocation of adequate funding to our police service in order to provide them with the tools that they need to help keep us safe. Simultaneously, however, we also believe in accountability. Therefore, we strongly support civil liberties, as well as transparency in our police service. For minor delinquencies, we value rehabilitation over punishment, but we are confident in our stance that very harsh crimes deserve very harsh penalties.

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
We believe that the environment is important. Therefore, our party supports reasonable environmental regulation that protects the people against pollution and “broken cycles” caused by the extinction of a species. However, we believe very strongly that the needs of the economy should be considered equally important as the needs of the environment, and that an equilibrium should be reached in terms of our nation’s environmental policies. We are also a pro-nuclear and thorium party, as nuclear power, and thorium-based nuclear power in particular, is much more cost effective than Wind and Solar energies, without all the pollution associated with fossil fuels. Thorium is an especially fruitful form of energy production, as there is almost zero risk of a nuclear meltdown, unlike traditional uranium/plutonium-based energy production designs.


  • Belmaria (Chairman)
  • Arkolon (Deputy Chairman)
  • New Zepuha (Honorable Member)
  • Finium (Political Affairs Director)
  • Zurkerx (Chief Recruiter)
  • The Liberated Territories (Party Treasurer)
  • Union of the West (Valued Member)
  • The Stern Archipelago (Valued Member)

..that sounds quite sensible, sign me up...
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Wed Dec 03, 2014 8:02 pm

Belmaria wrote:Come one, come all, to the Republican Reform Party! We are a centre-right big tent party with an established platform and broad membership! As the largest party currently in the works, if you are looking for a solid home for yourself in the coming senate RP, the Republican Reform Party is your best choice!

FISCAL POLICY
Our party believes in a balanced, reasonable approach to fiscal policy by supporting sound and efficient allocation of taxpayer funds, and a reasonable level of taxation that does not rip the shirts off the backs of our citizens. We also support moderate regulation of industry, but prefer market solutions to problems when they are available. We recognise the importance of the commercial backbone of this country, and believe that we should try to make the business climate as friendly as possible for the industrial growth of our nation.

FOREIGN POLICY
Our party favours peace over war, and prefers to make friends with other nations before becoming enemies with them. However, if a foreign power were to take aggressive actions against our great nation, we would wholly support any effort to defend ourselves and the fine people of our country. We value our military, and are faithful to our allies.

SOCIAL POLICY
As a party, we believe in the sovereignty of every individual, so long as it does not trump the common good of all. While we are secular in nature, we are not totally unopposed to progressive stances on various issues. At the same time, we understand the controversial nature of many social issues. As such, we leave these policies up to our members and our representatives, enforcing no strict consensus onto them.

EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE POLICY
Our party is very proud of our nation’s public education and healthcare systems, and hopes to offer our people the best education and the best healthcare for free. However, simultaneously, we understand the benefits of private education and private healthcare, and wish to offer the nation’s people a choice between public and private services. This type of opportunity for individuals to choose the best option that fits their needs makes our public services more competitive in the face of private establishments, and allows us to maintain a safe, practical, and highly-performing public services system.

CRIME AND JUSTICE POLICY
As a party, we believe in the concept of justice wholeheartedly. As such, we support the allocation of adequate funding to our police service in order to provide them with the tools that they need to help keep us safe. Simultaneously, however, we also believe in accountability. Therefore, we strongly support civil liberties, as well as transparency in our police service. For minor delinquencies, we value rehabilitation over punishment, but we are confident in our stance that very harsh crimes deserve very harsh penalties.

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
We believe that the environment is important. Therefore, our party supports reasonable environmental regulation that protects the people against pollution and “broken cycles” caused by the extinction of a species. However, we believe very strongly that the needs of the economy should be considered equally important as the needs of the environment, and that an equilibrium should be reached in terms of our nation’s environmental policies. We are also a pro-nuclear and thorium party, as nuclear power, and thorium-based nuclear power in particular, is much more cost effective than Wind and Solar energies, without all the pollution associated with fossil fuels. Thorium is an especially fruitful form of energy production, as there is almost zero risk of a nuclear meltdown, unlike traditional uranium/plutonium-based energy production designs.


  • Belmaria (Chairman)
  • Arkolon (Deputy Chairman)
  • New Zepuha (Honorable Member)
  • Finium (Political Affairs Director)
  • Zurkerx (Chief Recruiter)
  • The Liberated Territories (Party Treasurer)
  • Union of the West (Valued Member)
  • The Stern Archipelago (Valued Member)

I like the sound of this. I'm not sold on the name, for some reason.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads