It's not. As we have not chosen which history we are using. Though I thought the main probable thrust was democracy in 2014 to make sense with why we have start again with legislation etc.
Advertisement

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:44 am

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:45 am

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:50 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Yes and yes. And CTALNH's only saying it's disorganised so he can justify a Russian insurgency, it appears largely agreed upon that the military would've helped a peaceful transition to democracy and be fairly organised - They've had twenty three years to get organised after Soviet rule.
Yes as we can see from recent events in a former SSR that after 23 years their armed forces are very good at keeping out invaders and putting down separatists.
) and seized key areas before any reaction could be organised
by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:51 am
Glasgia wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
Yes as we can see from recent events in a former SSR that after 23 years their armed forces are very good at keeping out invaders and putting down separatists.
Well, Ukraine couldn't really do anything against the Russians in Crimea while the separatists have more advanced weaponry than them (not that Moscow has given them anything) and seized key areas before any reaction could be organised

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:56 am
CTALNH wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Well, Ukraine couldn't really do anything against the Russians in Crimea while the separatists have more advanced weaponry than them (not that Moscow has given them anything) and seized key areas before any reaction could be organised
Oh my....Such flimsy excuses.
ooc extremely sorry i am in interview mode.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:57 am

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:07 am
CTALNH wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Well, go ahead and say how most armies would've done better. The Ukrainians are far behind western standards, but definitely not simply disorganised.
Indeed.The Russian invasion of crimea disorganized the hell out of them with officers and soldiers you know...Leaving their posts.

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:11 am
CTALNH wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Well, go ahead and say how most armies would've done better. The Ukrainians are far behind western standards, but definitely not simply disorganised.
Indeed.The Russian invasion of crimea disorganized the hell out of them with officers and soldiers you know...Leaving their posts.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:12 am
Glasgia wrote:CTALNH wrote:Indeed.The Russian invasion of crimea disorganized the hell out of them with officers and soldiers you know...Leaving their posts.
Because they couldn't shoot. They couldn't set up any organised military attack, or Russia would have simply overpowered them with numbers and weaponry. Their only choice was to surrender or be starved in their barracks.

by Old Tyrannia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:16 am

by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:24 am
Glasgia wrote:CTALNH wrote:Indeed.The Russian invasion of crimea disorganized the hell out of them with officers and soldiers you know...Leaving their posts.
Because they couldn't shoot. They couldn't set up any organised military attack, or Russia would have simply overpowered them with numbers and weaponry. Their only choice was to surrender or be starved in their barracks.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:24 am

by Great Nepal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:29 am

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:32 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Because they couldn't shoot. They couldn't set up any organised military attack, or Russia would have simply overpowered them with numbers and weaponry. Their only choice was to surrender or be starved in their barracks.
So in other words the Ukrainian armed forces are a laughing stock who are not prepared to defend their country no matter what the situation and prefer self preservation over protecting their nation. Their reaction to the events in the eastern regions was slow, lethargic and seemingly uncoordinated and as a result civil war is looming. Non of the other militaries in ex-SSR countries are any better position bar perhaps Poland. Poland is probably one of the few countries in the ex soviet block one would expect their army to do it's job and tenaciously defend their country against Russian infiltration or invasion.
Great Nepal wrote:CTALNH wrote:Then the army is disorganized and needs new equipment quickly.
No, just because top political class changed doesn't mean we committed Baltonian equivalent of the great purge. Maybe very few highest profile generals got tried for collaborating with enemy but for large part the command chain and the army structure under dictatorship would remain the same; at least until it is decided otherwise.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:38 am
Great Nepal wrote:CTALNH wrote:Then the army is disorganized and needs new equipment quickly.
No, just because top political class changed doesn't mean we committed Baltonian equivalent of the great purge. Maybe very few highest profile generals got tried for collaborating with enemy but for large part the command chain and the army structure under dictatorship would remain the same; at least until it is decided otherwise.

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:39 am
CTALNH wrote:Great Nepal wrote:No, just because top political class changed doesn't mean we committed Baltonian equivalent of the great purge. Maybe very few highest profile generals got tried for collaborating with enemy but for large part the command chain and the army structure under dictatorship would remain the same; at least until it is decided otherwise.
Okay then I will go ask my Russian brotheren to coup the baltonia again.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:40 am
Glasgia wrote:CTALNH wrote:Then the army is disorganized and needs new equipment quickly.The Nihilistic view wrote:
So in other words the Ukrainian armed forces are a laughing stock who are not prepared to defend their country no matter what the situation and prefer self preservation over protecting their nation. Their reaction to the events in the eastern regions was slow, lethargic and seemingly uncoordinated and as a result civil war is looming. Non of the other militaries in ex-SSR countries are any better position bar perhaps Poland. Poland is probably one of the few countries in the ex soviet block one would expect their army to do it's job and tenaciously defend their country against Russian infiltration or invasion.
By not shooting, they protected their nation. They prevented a complete Russian invasion of the majority of their own homelands, rather than futilely attempting to defend a small peninsula and putting the rest of the nation at risk

by Arkolon » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:40 am

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:41 am

by Great Nepal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:41 am
CTALNH wrote:Great Nepal wrote:No, just because top political class changed doesn't mean we committed Baltonian equivalent of the great purge. Maybe very few highest profile generals got tried for collaborating with enemy but for large part the command chain and the army structure under dictatorship would remain the same; at least until it is decided otherwise.
Okay then I will go ask my Russian brotheren to coup the baltonia again.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:42 am
Arkolon wrote:School vouchers, anyone?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:44 am

by Great Nepal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:44 am
Arkolon wrote:School vouchers, anyone?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement