New Zepuha wrote:The Drunken Ushanka now has a cigarette vending machine!
No thanks. I quit. Those machines are bad for you.
...
Advertisement

by New Zepuha » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:06 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by Gothmogs » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:09 pm


by New Zepuha » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:12 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by Malgrave » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:13 pm
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

by Gothmogs » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:14 pm
)
by Arkolon » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:16 pm
by Ainin » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:19 pm

by Gothmogs » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:21 pm


by Arkolon » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:29 pm
Ainin wrote:Arkolon wrote:... What did he do wrong? I wasn't there, for the record.
He admitted to being a paedophile. More information here.
We tend to not talk about him.

by Gothmogs » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:36 pm
Neragua wrote:Moving swiftly on...
Does the lobby have popcorn? I could really go for some popcorn right now.


by Neragua » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:41 pm
Gothmogs wrote:Neragua wrote:Moving swiftly on...
Does the lobby have popcorn? I could really go for some popcorn right now.
You can probably get some at Kalengija Forever.

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jun 15, 2014 5:07 pm
Tsuken wrote:If proxy voting is still a thing, then I, Petras Freijs (Tsuken), allow Great Nepal to vote for me in any upcoming elections and on any upcoming legislation until June 22, 2014.

by The New World Oceania » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:10 pm
[i][b][align=center]The Idealists[/align][/b][/i]
[quote][i]Just as turbulence is an inevitable consequence of the laws of fluid dynamics, the existence of such societies is an inevitable consequence of the laws governing human nature.[/i][/quote]
[align=center]image[/align]
[align=center][blocktext][box][url][color=#a90000]Who We Are[/color][/url] | [url][color=#a90000]Platform[/color][/url] | [url][color=#a90000]Membership[/color][/url][/box][/blocktext][/align]
[align=center][b][i]Who Are The Idealists?[/i][/b][/align]
The Idealists, as the name implies, is a Baltonian Society seeking to make this country ideal. We intend to accomplish this by strict adherence to our broad platform. Membership is easy: no application is involved. It's suggested you read our platform to understand our intentions.
We are founded on the principles of liberty, high living quality, safety, and progression. Our other official names include Progressive Libertarians, Forwardists, and Masochists; the preferred term is Idealists.
We [u]are not[/u] a political party. In fact, The Idealists oppose political parties as we believe them to restrict individual liberties. The Idealists is a society, which grants members more freedoms as a result of being a part of us. However, Idealists [i]can[/i] hold membership in parties in addition to being part of our society.
[align=center][b][i]Platform[/i][/b][/align]
Our platform attempts to include everything necessary for an ideal Baltonia. It is suggested you read it in entirety, but the table of contents will allow you to navigate to what you find important. See our Articles of Idealism for a short manifesto.
[align=center][blocktext][box][url][color=#a90000]Idealism[/color][/url] | [url][color=#a90000]Platform[/color][/url] | [url][color=#a90000]Membership[/color][/url][/box][/blocktext][/align]
[align=center][b][u]Idealism[/u][/b][/align]The most important definition here is of idealism. [u]Many view idealism as an unattainable utopia, but The Idealists intend to make it reality.[/u] This will involve a synthesis of what makes life ideal and a new combination of ideologies to make a perfect Baltonia.
•[b]An ideal life is free.[/b] This means an individual will be free from not only government, but also corporations, other individuals, and themselves. A government has to know when to step in and when to step out. Keep in mind that a "government" is a group deciding to aid a society by guiding it: there is no such thing as anarchy because a government will inevitably arise. We need to make the best of this inevitability.
•[b]An ideal life is wealthy.[/b] The State must charge its citizens as little as possible while providing as much as it can. We need to minimize our income while maximizing our output. We take a Trotskyist perspective on the role of government as a business. We also believe economic freedom satisfies both the requirement of liberty and of wealth. By recognizing economics is controlled by human hands, we can incite its positive aspects and mitigate its harmful forces.
•[b]An ideal life is responsible.[/b] The government has two duties in the best nation: provide and protect. An ideal State provides its people with high standards of living and protects they're freedom and safety. The former is yielded: it exists only when the means of production are purposefully shared. The latter are natural: they only cease to exist per aggression.
•[b]An ideal life is healthy.[/b] An individual has the right to be healthy in an ideal world. Their government should assure this is possible.
•[b]An ideal life is safe.[/b] An individual has the right to be and keep their property safe in an ideal world. Their government should assure this, too, is possible.
•[b]An ideal life is objective.[/b] Disagreement is poisonous to idealism. Indubitable truth is imperative. If a government does not allow or protect this it must be eliminated. If an individual or business attempts to motivate implicitly malicious knowledge, it is safe to assume they are a threat to stability if they have no objective purpose to target the foundations of epistemology. Lackluster unity is [u]proven[/u] to cause widespread torment and death.
[align=center][u][b]Economics[/b][/u][/align]The ideal society allows total economic mobility. Thus, minimal restriction must occur. The minimum restriction necessary is that allowing individuals to remain equal to each other in this mobility, so individuals must be restricted from harming another's access to economic freedom. A strong economy is entitled to those causing it and those they choose the serve. On these basis is the ideal economy set.
[b]Economic Freedom[/b]
For practical idealist purposes, we can agree that economic freedom requires law. In the ideal society, an unconventional minarchist approach is necessary. The State will provide and protect. An ideal individual will be able to function with complete economic flexibility, so long as they do not violate another's [u]right or ability[/u] to function in the same manner.
•[b]Private Property[/b] — an entity has the right to own property. In the ideal society, their property will be protected from crime and they will fear no repercussions for possessing this property. Government will only intervene in the ownership of property when one's rights are threatened or violated. Any entity [i]except[/i] for a government as a whole may concern themselves with the use of property, be it consumption or production, unless rights are violated. Means of production are not viable private property. Means of production must be shared in the ideal society, but economic freedom will not be restricted by this.
•[b]Freedom of Contract[/b] — an individual can make an agreement without repercussion or restriction on behalf of a public external party so long as said agreement is not liable to threaten or violate one's rights, unless it is explicit in the agreement that one party will be harmed and that all involved parties are fully aware of this, in addition to aware of all other involved parties except in the case of the preceding clause. Any other condition of a contract is a violation of rights and should be regarded with eliminations whereas it threatens the ideal society. We are mostly in agreement with the philosophy of Robert Nozick on the matter, though we believe that such a freedom would exist in the ideal Marxist state, also. We recognize that the ideal Marxist state is an impractical ideal state, and our ideal economic platform seeks practical idealism.
•[b]Freedom from Exploitation[/b] — imperatively considered with the aforementioned freedoms of association and contracts, the State must affirm that no individual is coerced into exploitation. Therefore, as stated, economic forces must be grasped to stagnate consequences and motivate all positive effects. In the ideal society, exploitation is not seen only as immoral, but as ineffective.
[b]Taxation[/b]
Taxation does not exist in the ideal society. This occurs by the cessation of the effects of currency external to the ideal state. Therefore, a World State must be formed to void the necessity of money for the government. The government does not therefore, subsidize businesses. Rather, it functions as a non-monetary organization whose return is maintenance of the ideal society.
[b]Wages and Class[/b]
Class structures effectively cease to exist upon formation of the Huxleyan World State. The government should not invoke any economic division of classes by affecting or distributing resources and the means of production.
[b]Subsidies and Nationalization[/b]
The State owns nothing. The State shares the means of production with every other individual in the ideal world.Just as turbulence is an inevitable consequence of the laws of fluid dynamics, the existence of such societies is an inevitable consequence of the laws governing human nature.
[url]Who We Are[/url] | [url]Platform[/url] | [url]Membership[/url]
[url]Idealism[/url] | [url]Platform[/url] | [url]Membership[/url]

by Maklohi Vai » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:30 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:What will happen if Yanalia and Beta are tied for second place at the end of the election first round?

by Senyosu » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:40 pm

by Costa Fierro » Sun Jun 15, 2014 9:25 pm

by CTALNH » Sun Jun 15, 2014 10:29 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Does this Godforsaken landfill of a country have a proper military?

by Costa Fierro » Sun Jun 15, 2014 10:41 pm

by The New World Oceania » Sun Jun 15, 2014 10:54 pm

by Glasgia » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:09 am

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:00 am
Glasgia wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
Does it have equipment? Branches?
Yes and yes. And CTALNH's only saying it's disorganised so he can justify a Russian insurgency, it appears largely agreed upon that the military would've helped a peaceful transition to democracy and be fairly organised - They've had twenty three years to get organised after Soviet rule.

by CTALNH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:28 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement