Advertisement
by Britanno » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:38 pm
by Unicario » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:40 pm
Britanno wrote:Why is everyone calling Latin America European? I don't get it...
by Estva » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:40 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Estva wrote:This is the easiest way to do things, and it is more fun to interact with the existing countries with slight alternate history.
Our internal politics is going to differ from whatever our environment is because NS is by nature more extreme and liberals than 99% of nations. Either you have Baltonia like restrictions - never going to happen or we go with Aurentina where we legalized abortion completely within first few months.
by Britanno » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:42 pm
by Great Nepal » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:44 pm
Estva wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Our internal politics is going to differ from whatever our environment is because NS is by nature more extreme and liberals than 99% of nations. Either you have Baltonia like restrictions - never going to happen or we go with Aurentina where we legalized abortion completely within first few months.
The difference is not the internal politics but the setting and flavor.
Estva wrote:We will likely still have some realism restrictions.
by Estva » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:47 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Largely immaterial to RP. We never discussed MP's culture or colour ICly, its essentially trivial and rejecting/favouring location over other based on it doesn't make sense.
Great Nepal wrote:Seeing how that was blamed for Baltonia's failure, I highly doubt so.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:49 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:49 pm
by Kralta » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:53 pm
by The State of Deseret » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:53 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Estva wrote:The difference is not the internal politics but the setting and flavor.
Largely immaterial to RP. We never discussed MP's culture or colour ICly, its essentially trivial and rejecting/favouring location over other based on it doesn't make sense.Estva wrote:We will likely still have some realism restrictions.
Seeing how that was blamed for Baltonia's failure, I highly doubt so.
by Great Nepal » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:57 pm
The State of Deseret wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Largely immaterial to RP. We never discussed MP's culture or colour ICly, its essentially trivial and rejecting/favouring location over other based on it doesn't make sense.
Seeing how that was blamed for Baltonia's failure, I highly doubt so.
There should be restrictions otherwise theres no point choosing a nation's location.
by The State of Deseret » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:02 pm
by Great Nepal » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:07 pm
by United Provinces of Atlantica » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:08 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:We can have a 50% split between white people and non-whites. Fair enough compromise.
by Kralta » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:08 pm
Great Nepal wrote:No, Baltonia showed forcing people to contrive their ideology doesn't work.
by Great Nepal » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:12 pm
by Kralta » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:14 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Kralta wrote:People are either going to rp their own political ideology(the majority) or a carefully build their character's political ideas. I doubt geography is going to have much of an impact on it.
So why determine geography based on what would be close to "realistic" for political believes rather than only thing location determines: dept of foreign and military policy.
by Belmaria » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:18 pm
Ainin wrote:<3 your logoArglorand wrote:For starters, there're Canada's hate speech laws, where advocating hatred, or "hate propaganda", is rather narrowly and clearly defined. Namely, "any writing, sign or visible representation that advocates or promotes genocide or the communication of which by any person would constitute an offence under section 319." Virtually no criticism of the government has to involve advocating for genocide, I'm sure.
There also used to be Section 13 of the Human Rights Act banning hateful speech through media, but fucking Harper repealed it.
by Aden Protectorate » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:22 pm
Belmaria wrote:Ainin wrote:<3 your logo
There also used to be Section 13 of the Human Rights Act banning hateful speech through media, but fucking Harper repealed it.
Kudos to Harper
by Kralta » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:23 pm
Belmaria wrote:Ainin wrote:<3 your logo
There also used to be Section 13 of the Human Rights Act banning hateful speech through media, but fucking Harper repealed it.
Kudos to Harper
by Belmaria » Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:24 pm
by Alevuss » Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement