That's not bad.
If I thought about that when I was up doing it, I think I would have done something with the Broncos.
"Manning will come in and win this thing, despite not being part of it, just so he can finally retire with a superbowl win"
Advertisement
by Roski » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:27 pm
by Constaniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:27 pm
Alleniana wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:Good god, does Harper's French ever bug me. I mean, he at least has a basic to intermediate grasp of the language (not that that means anything -- all of the candidates for Prime Minister have to speak both French and English), but every time he speaks in French I can't help but think that he has a Mexican accent for some reason. >.>
Well, at least he speaks English decently. *looks at Abbott*Roski wrote:
Vietnam doesn't seem to think so.
Vietnam doesn't need to have an opinion on the matter. The biggest, greatest haemorrhages of government spending and force can't possibly hope to slow down the steaming train that is the internal development of China.Roski wrote:
There's been talk of China's endless expanding building cities, China's building cities with the intent to generate revenue, and give the absolutely gargantuan population a place to live. Sounds all nice and dandy, and it would seem to someone who didn't pay very well attention that China was building something beneficial.
However, here's the problem: They're costing too much money to make for what their output is, in fact, entire towns that have been built still have a population of 0, despite the fact that they cost a lot of money to make.
Even worse, China's not letting up. Its a bit like a cancer cell at this point - China won't stop making cities, even though they are doing absolutely nothing to generate revenue.
And some think this will pop during the next few years, and that China will not be able to survive it.
Survive? That's a bit like saying that the US plasma television industry's collapse will result in the union's dissolution.
Zeinbrad wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:Good god, does Harper's French ever bug me. I mean, he at least has a basic to intermediate grasp of the language (not that that means anything -- all of the candidates for Prime Minister have to speak both French and English), but every time he speaks in French I can't help but think that he has a Mexican accent for some reason. >.>
It seems that everyone on the internet hate's their head of state.
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:28 pm
by Nature-Spirits » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:30 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:Good god, does Harper's French ever bug me. I mean, he at least has a basic to intermediate grasp of the language (not that that means anything -- all of the candidates for Prime Minister have to speak both French and English), but every time he speaks in French I can't help but think that he has a Mexican accent for some reason. >.>
It seems that everyone on the internet hate's their head of state.
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:30 pm
by Nature-Spirits » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:32 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:Everyone likes the Queen; disliking her is why John Oliver is technically a war criminal.
Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:32 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:Everyone likes the Queen; disliking her is why John Oliver is technically a war criminal.
Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
by Rupudska » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:33 pm
Constaniana wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:A teammate of mine was asked to give a 7 minute speech on the following question this Saturday; "Who will win the Superbowl?"
He picked the Seahawks out of resentment.
I'm the opposite. I want the Patriots to win, because Seattle won last year, the Packers must be avenged, east coast loyalty and whatnot, and to top it all off my sister in law and her mum are from Seattle.
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties
by Constaniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:33 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:Everyone likes the Queen; disliking her is why John Oliver is technically a war criminal.
Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:34 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
There have only between two English kings named Charles, so probably not, no.
The most recent story I can think of along those lines is Richard III, an ancestor no English monarch is exactly in a rush to remind people of.
by Alleniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:35 pm
Constaniana wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
Actually there's only been two kings by the name of Charles. Henry, Edward and George have been much more popular. I think the remains you're thinking of are those of Richard III.
by Roski » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:35 pm
Rupudska wrote:Constaniana wrote:I'm the opposite. I want the Patriots to win, because Seattle won last year, the Packers must be avenged, east coast loyalty and whatnot, and to top it all off my sister in law and her mum are from Seattle.
See I would be all for east coast loyalty if I didn't loathe the Pats almost as much as I loathe the Skankees.
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:35 pm
Constaniana wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
Actually there's only been two kings by the name of Charles. Henry, Edward and George have been much more popular. I think the remains you're thinking of are those of Richard III.
by Constaniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:35 pm
Rupudska wrote:Constaniana wrote:I'm the opposite. I want the Patriots to win, because Seattle won last year, the Packers must be avenged, east coast loyalty and whatnot, and to top it all off my sister in law and her mum are from Seattle.
See I would be all for east coast loyalty if I didn't loathe the Pats almost as much as I loathe the Skankees.
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Alleniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:35 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:There have only between two English kings named Charles, so probably not, no.
The most recent story I can think of along those lines is Richard III, an ancestor no English monarch is exactly in a rush to remind people of.
Why? He's pretty attractive.
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:36 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:There have only between two English kings named Charles, so probably not, no.
The most recent story I can think of along those lines is Richard III, an ancestor no English monarch is exactly in a rush to remind people of.
Why? He's pretty attractive.
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:36 pm
Constaniana wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:Didn't they found the remains of some King (Who name I think was Charles, because Charles is apparently the go to name for a King) and people were making a buzz over the Queens lineage?
Actually there's only been two kings by the name of Charles. Henry, Edward and George have been much more popular. I think the remains you're thinking of are those of Richard III.
by Rupudska » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:38 pm
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:38 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:39 pm
by Constaniana » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:39 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:40 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:41 pm
by Seraven » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:42 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.
An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:43 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement