NATION

PASSWORD

Mod-Sanctioned LGBT Rights & Issues Thread

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:29 pm

Galter Gulcher wrote:
Lost heros wrote:How is the minority discriminating against him?


By forcing him to serve them via the court system.

That's not discrimination.

If I sue you I'm not discriminating against you.
Last edited by Norstal on Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5750
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Galter Gulcher wrote:So the minority can discriminate against him?


Yeah man, it's so terrible, he had to take their money in exchange for the product he had opened a business for the purpose of providing. Jesus must be weeping for joy that at least he never had to experience that level of persecution.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Auralia wrote:Except there are plenty of good bakeries willing to service gay couples.


Ah yes, Separate But Equal.


Except it's not, because the vast majority of bakeries are willing to service both gay and heterosexual couples.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Galter Gulcher wrote:
Lost heros wrote:How is the minority discriminating against him?


By forcing him to serve them via the court system.

I doubt there will be police stationed in his shop watching him make a cake for the couple. I daresay they got their cake elsewhere. He probably will have to pay a fine, though.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Galter Gulcher wrote:
Lost heros wrote:How is the minority discriminating against him?


By forcing him to serve them via the court system.

And that is discriminating how?
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Slarvainian wrote:
Auralia wrote:
Because religious practice isn't limited to personal convictions and going to church every Sunday. Religious beliefs permeate one's whole life.


Judaism could also use that argument to ban pork from being sold in stores...


But hypocrisy is easier to expose if you have Muslims pushing to ban pork instead. The owtraeg would be hilarious.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:their not being forced. people are saying that if the baker refused to serve them then the couple should take their business to another baker who would serve them.

By denying business to them, the baker was forcing them to go some place else to get a cake.

he really didn't force them to go anywhere since a judge ordered him to serve the couple.
Last edited by Gig em Aggies on Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:31 pm

Auralia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Ah yes, Separate But Equal.


Except it's not, because the vast majority of bakeries are willing to service both gay and heterosexual couples.

That is separate.

And you're saying it's equal.

Separate But Equal.

What is it that you don't understand about those three words?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Maqo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 895
Founded: Mar 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Maqo » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:31 pm

This might have been a really interesting debate 50 years ago when that damn Civil Rights Act was made.
However, we're half a century moved on from there now. The business was clearly acting against the law. The rights of people trump the 'rights' of the business in this case.

I'm appalled by the number of people who think the business has done no wrong. Though, I guess this place is frequented by ancaps and libertarians who don't seem to understand that you can infringe on someone elses freedom by exercising your own rights.

Discrimination is bad. Women, blacks, gays are all humans, and should not be treated like second-class citizens and need to go elsewhere for the 'privilege' of being served.
My nation's views do not reflect my own.
Anti: Ideology, religion, the non-aggression principle.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:31 pm

Slarvainian wrote:
Auralia wrote:
Because religious practice isn't limited to personal convictions and going to church every Sunday. Religious beliefs permeate one's whole life.


Judaism could also use that argument to ban pork from being sold in stores...


Well, no, because the state should be permitted to burden religious beliefs when it is the least restrictive means of accomplishing a compelling governmental interest.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5750
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:31 pm

Auralia wrote:Because religious practice isn't limited to personal convictions and going to church every Sunday. Religious beliefs permeate one's whole life.


Can you quote me the passage from the Bible where Jesus says, "Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" ?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:32 pm

Auralia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Ah yes, Separate But Equal.


Except it's not, because the vast majority of bakeries are willing to service both gay and heterosexual couples.


How do you know that? Do you have a listing of bakeries in the area and their serving orientations?

If you let one store discriminate their customer base, what's to stop others from doing so? After all we all forget how the South had plenty of quality establishments for black customers during the Jim Crow era.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:33 pm

Myrensis wrote:
Auralia wrote:Because religious practice isn't limited to personal convictions and going to church every Sunday. Religious beliefs permeate one's whole life.


Can you quote me the passage from the Bible where Jesus says, "Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" ?

You haven't read Bullshit 10:15 did you?

"Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" - Bullshit 10:15
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:33 pm

Auralia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Ah yes, Separate But Equal.


Except it's not, because the vast majority of bakeries are willing to service both gay and heterosexual couples.

But this bakery is keeping gay couples separate by excluding them from the store and you are saying it isn't unequal. Sounds like separate but equal to me.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Galter Gulcher
Minister
 
Posts: 3280
Founded: Sep 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Galter Gulcher » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:33 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Galter Gulcher wrote:
By forcing him to serve them via the court system.

And that is discriminating how?


Because, maybe the baker has a political or religious belief against gay marriage. Or prehaps he is a idiot who doesnt like making money.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature.
Screw the NSA.
I support gay marriage.
I am against Gay attitudes towards pretty much anything.
Hungary people need to just eat some endangered animals.
Mallorea and Riva should be awarded for their actions.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:34 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, see, the problem with small businesses is that they operate under the biases and prejudices of the business owner.

You're thinking big corporations, think much smaller, think a regular baker who opened a small shop.

So it's against the baker's religion to make money needed to survive? Weird religion.


No, but it can be against the baker's views, which in turn damage his business.

Look at Chik-Fil-A; that's a perfect example of a business being run by a Christian, anti-gay fellow. Their disdain for homosexuals doesn't affect service because it's freaking chik-fil-a, it doesn't even matter down at the bottom the stupid views of the higher ups.

However, in a small business owned by a single person, those biases matter, because it's how clientele gets rejected or accepted or even made comfortable. Not everyone is in a business to make as much money as they can either.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:34 pm

Norstal wrote:
Auralia wrote:
Except it's not, because the vast majority of bakeries are willing to service both gay and heterosexual couples.

That is separate.

And you're saying it's equal.

Separate But Equal.

What is it that you don't understand about those three words?


It's obvious you're trying to draw an analogy to the government-sponsored racial segregation of the 1950s. That analogy is inaccurate, because we are talking about a) private sector discrimination, not public sector discrimination, and b) only a small minority of business are engaged in such discrimination.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:34 pm

Myrensis wrote:
Galter Gulcher wrote:So the minority can discriminate against him?


Yeah man, it's so terrible, he had to take their money in exchange for the product he had opened a business for the purpose of providing. Jesus must be weeping for joy that at least he never had to experience that level of persecution.

your right Jesus suffered more then the baker ever did but that's not topic.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Slarvainian
Minister
 
Posts: 2132
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Slarvainian » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:35 pm

Myrensis wrote:
Auralia wrote:Because religious practice isn't limited to personal convictions and going to church every Sunday. Religious beliefs permeate one's whole life.


Can you quote me the passage from the Bible where Jesus says, "Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" ?


Or even that you must refuse them service.

I think the argument here is though the cake was to celebrate their anniversary and therefore the baker baking the cake would be condoning their sinful acts of what they do privately in the bedroom because to my knowledge a man emotionally loving another man (or the other way around with females) is not condemned in any main religious texts.
V: Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy. And ideas are bulletproof.

Sophist, Ironist, the po-mo-neo-marxist Jordan Peterson warned you about.

I really enjoy talking ideas with people so feel free to TG me.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:35 pm

Norstal wrote:
Myrensis wrote:
Can you quote me the passage from the Bible where Jesus says, "Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" ?

You haven't read Bullshit 10:15 did you?

"Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" - Bullshit 10:15

"Gays must not try to fight discrimination!" - Bullshit 10:16
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Lunalia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunalia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:36 pm

Auralia wrote:
Norstal wrote:That is separate.

And you're saying it's equal.

Separate But Equal.

What is it that you don't understand about those three words?


It's obvious you're trying to draw an analogy to the government-sponsored racial segregation of the 1950s. That analogy is inaccurate, because we are talking about a) private sector discrimination, not public sector discrimination, and b) only a small minority of business are engaged in such discrimination.

I rather wonder how many more businesses would choose to engage in such discrimination if we were to throw out the Civil Rights Act...
Wikkiwallana wrote:
Auralia wrote:
The Catholic Church teaches that participation in gay "commitment ceremonies" is wrong.

You may not have noticed, but New Mexico is not located in Vatican City.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:36 pm

Slarvainian wrote:
Myrensis wrote:
Can you quote me the passage from the Bible where Jesus says, "Gays must never be allowed to have cake!" ?


Or even that you must refuse them service.

I think the argument here is though the cake was to celebrate their anniversary and therefore the baker baking the cake would be condoning their sinful acts of what they do privately in the bedroom because to my knowledge a man emotionally loving another man (or the other way around with females) is not condemned in any main religious texts.

The baker wouldn't be condoning anything. As long as it's legal and doesn't harm others, it shouldn't matter what happens to the cake. The baker has no right to know what people do in their bedrooms.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:36 pm

Galter Gulcher wrote:
Lost heros wrote:And that is discriminating how?


Because, maybe the baker has a political or religious belief against gay marriage.

His position on gay marriage is irrelevant when concerning his serving of cake.
Or prehaps he is a idiot who doesnt like making money.

If he was an idiot who didn't like making money, he wouldn't have opened up a business.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:38 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Lost heros wrote:So it's against the baker's religion to make money needed to survive? Weird religion.


No, but it can be against the baker's views, which in turn damage his business.

Look at Chik-Fil-A; that's a perfect example of a business being run by a Christian, anti-gay fellow. Their disdain for homosexuals doesn't affect service because it's freaking chik-fil-a, it doesn't even matter down at the bottom the stupid views of the higher ups.

However, in a small business owned by a single person, those biases matter, because it's how clientele gets rejected or accepted or even made comfortable. Not everyone is in a business to make as much money as they can either.

Chik-fil-a doesn't refuse chicken to gay people.
This small business was refusing cake to gay people.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:39 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Galter Gulcher wrote:
Because, maybe the baker has a political or religious belief against gay marriage.

His position on gay marriage is irrelevant when concerning his serving of cake.
Or prehaps he is a idiot who doesnt like making money.

If he was an idiot who didn't like making money, he wouldn't have opened up a business.


1 - Again, his positions put him in a very precarious position. A Sole Ownership (which is what I am assuming this is) is not the same as a corporation. Most Sole Ownerships operate by providing user experiences in the community and in their business. If they feel like they don't want to cater to homosexual couples that's part of UX, but it still doesn't make it right or ethical.

2 - Again, why do you assume everyone is out there to grow into a multi-national corporation and saturate their markets?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads