*Joins in*
Advertisement
by Jetan » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
by Lianhua (Ancient) » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Vultasia wrote:*Whistles Maamme*
by Divair » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Napkiraly wrote:Divair wrote:More than missed. He'll be mourned globally. He wasn't just liked, he was loved.
And now we await the fallout of his death. There are two reasons to be upset over his passing. 1) A great human being has been lost, one that served as inspiration and hope for many 2) His death now means that certain not so great situations involving SA might possibly happen.
by Taoju » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
New Laikland wrote:Taoju wrote:More like a logistical nightmare. Technocracy in it's raw form will only lead to despotism. Or enlightened despotism. Or some shit like that.
Apply democracy or a merit based system to keep things in check.
Technocracy is merit based. Only the educated and intelligent would have power.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Taoju wrote:New Laikland wrote:
I've never read it (or heard of it), but just off the term "white nationalism", doesn't imply Racism. It's Racialism. I'd be considered a white nationalist somewhat, I'm proud of being white. But in no way do I genetically care about race. I'm more concerned about culture and education.
White nationalism is white supremacy. Racist through and through.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by New Laikland » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Taoju wrote:Not entirely. Meritocracy implies change whenever possible. Leaders will be challenged if under qualified and removed from power. Pure technocracy only devolves into despotism Applying nationalism is spitting on the original ideal, and you should feel horrible.
by Immoren » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Priory Academy USSR wrote:Immoren wrote:"Take my love.
Take my land.
Take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care,
I'm still free.
You can't take the sky from me.
Take me out to the black.
Tell em I ain't comin' back.
Burn the land
And boil the sea.
You can't take the sky from me.
There's no place I can be
Since I found Serenity.
But you can't take the sky from me."
Firefly nostalgia attack?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:13 pm
by Immoren » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:13 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Lianhua (Ancient) » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:13 pm
New Laikland wrote:Nail on the head. Neo Nazis and other idiots are more of a danger to society and nation than good.
by New Laikland » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:14 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Basically it means that whites should stick to whites, Asians with Asians, etc.
Which is quite racist, as it only serves to divide.
by Jetan » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:14 pm
by Immoren » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:15 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Napkiraly » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:15 pm
Divair wrote:Napkiraly wrote:And now we await the fallout of his death. There are two reasons to be upset over his passing. 1) A great human being has been lost, one that served as inspiration and hope for many 2) His death now means that certain not so great situations involving SA might possibly happen.
He was a golden age personified. Now that it's gone..
I don't want to think about it.
by New Laikland » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:15 pm
by Sanguinea » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:16 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Lianhua wrote:But it would be unrealistic to expect most people to be able to make the intellectual distinction between racialism and racism - a distinction most neo-nazi and neo-fascist thugs may not be able to do. Were they as socially responsible as they were intelligent, or had they thought it through, they should have at least thought about that.
In reality racialism is nothing more than a fancy way to say that you're a racist while still pretending to be a decent human being.
by Taoju » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:16 pm
New Laikland wrote:Taoju wrote:Not entirely. Meritocracy implies change whenever possible. Leaders will be challenged if under qualified and removed from power. Pure technocracy only devolves into despotism Applying nationalism is spitting on the original ideal, and you should feel horrible.
mer·i·toc·ra·cy (mr-tkr-s)
n. pl. mer·i·toc·ra·cies
1. A system in which advancement is based on individual ability or achievement.
2.
a. A group of leaders or officeholders selected on the basis of individual ability or achievement.
b. Leadership by such a group.
It means that whoever deserves the power will get it. It doesn't quite mean that it will change when possible or needed.
Applying nationalism isn't changing much. Technocracy, even in it's original form, allowed the idea of nations and even supported it.
by Oaledonia » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:16 pm
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Priory Academy USSR » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:16 pm
by Jetan » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:17 pm
Anollasia wrote:I do not have the slightest clue what to say, therefore I shall leave TET for the time being.
In other words, see ya bitches!
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:17 pm
New Laikland wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Basically it means that whites should stick to whites, Asians with Asians, etc.
Which is quite racist, as it only serves to divide.
Racialism is including race into your opinions. That's it. Racism is the belief that a race is superior or inferior to another. On the white nationalist part, not quite, again. Like I said, I'm white; I've dated a black girl before, a hispanic girl, and would do it again.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:18 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Divair » Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:19 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement