Photograph was the last song I liked from them.

Advertisement

by Lianhua (Ancient) » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:04 am


by Kvatchdom » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:05 am
Aeken wrote:Lianhua wrote:What was that.
Lonely Island. Amazing.Kvatchdom wrote:Me too
This one's pretty good too.


by Lies and Ignorance » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:05 am

by Luxew » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:06 am


by Coffee Cakes » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:06 am
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.

by Coffee Cakes » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:07 am

Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:07 am
Lianhua wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:I'd rather burn it to the ground.
Photograph was the last song I liked from them.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.


by Lies and Ignorance » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:09 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:10 am

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Coffee Cakes » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:11 am
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.

by Lies and Ignorance » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:12 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Lies and Ignorance wrote:You're admitting that pseudoscience is filth, then?
Nope. It's just a comedic response to your post.![]()
I don't promote either evolution or creation, really.
I'm an agnostic on that, leaning evolution, but I fail to see how it's a problem to think evolution happened with divine input. *shrugs*

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:13 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Lies and Ignorance wrote:You're admitting that pseudoscience is filth, then?
Nope. It's just a comedic response to your post.![]()
I don't promote either evolution or creation, really.
I'm an agnostic on that, leaning evolution, but I fail to see how it's a problem to think evolution happened with divine input. *shrugs*

by Luxew » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:13 am


by Coffee Cakes » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:14 am
Lies and Ignorance wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:
Nope. It's just a comedic response to your post.![]()
I don't promote either evolution or creation, really.
I'm an agnostic on that, leaning evolution, but I fail to see how it's a problem to think evolution happened with divine input. *shrugs*
I don't think you heard what I said.
"Pseudoscience is filth."
Is pseudoscience generally worthless and does it need to be tossed out? Let's get this out of the way.
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.
by Souseiseki » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:15 am
Luxew wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
i'm just going to ignore "people don't feel like changing maps" and "you shouldn't want to be independent unless you are being literally governed by hitler" and jump straight to asking you to what level would you be ok with china running your country? i mean, you could be semi-autonomous. sure you might occasionally get forced into a war or something but hey.
you turn into an absolute tory whenever anyhting welfare related comes up. it's really scary.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa is a universal distress signal
China & the UK are entirely different countries, though. But Tibet is entirely different story as well, but China is getting rid of its labor camps. I would rather be Scotland under the UK.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Souseiseki wrote:you turn into an absolute tory whenever anyhting welfare related comes up. it's really scary.l
Well I'm pretty much centrist so it makes sense I'd lean right on some topics, like that and the EU. Besides, even on welfare I tend to agree with the broad direction of the policy while being at least somewhat critical of elements of (i.e bedroom tax) and the way it's implemented. Most places other than NSG I'd still get called a leftist, so...

by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:19 am
Souseiseki wrote:Luxew wrote:
China & the UK are entirely different countries, though. But Tibet is entirely different story as well, but China is getting rid of its labor camps. I would rather be Scotland under the UK.
what about america, then? ireland? how close do they need to be with you before you go "yeah i'm in uguuu"?Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Well I'm pretty much centrist so it makes sense I'd lean right on some topics, like that and the EU. Besides, even on welfare I tend to agree with the broad direction of the policy while being at least somewhat critical of elements of (i.e bedroom tax) and the way it's implemented. Most places other than NSG I'd still get called a leftist, so...
i can't remember specific quotes but the policies themselves are mean spirited albeit admittedly coated in feelgood bullshit and you are just as bad in the arguments you put forth to defend said policies
fake edit: nevermind i just searched. "disabled people who are wrongly assessed by incompetent company and can't make it through months/years of appealing to get the benefits they need and die or are driven to suicide" became "commit suicide rather than look for work". that was a hoot. (literally just copying what i said and what you said here) i'm honestly not sure how much bullshit it will take for you to realize that not everyone gets the perfect jobcentre experience you got and that the tories actually don't have good intentions in their reforms which coincidentally always backfire.

by The Holy Therns » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:19 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Lies and Ignorance » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:22 am
Coffee Cakes wrote:Lies and Ignorance wrote:I don't think you heard what I said.
"Pseudoscience is filth."
Is pseudoscience generally worthless and does it need to be tossed out? Let's get this out of the way.
There's no proof it's pseudoscience though, but eh. *shrug*
Good thing I never did care about the topic.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:22 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Immoren » Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:22 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement