NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate] - Version 4

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Bierstaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 849
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bierstaat » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:29 pm

The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:I'm sorry if I'm getting bent out of shape about this, but this kind of behaviour really gets my goat. I need a break for a bit, I'll be back on tomorrow. Please TG me if you have anything urgent I ought to know about.

Senator, I don't see what any of us have done other than disagree with you.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28

Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:29 pm

The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:Senator Martin Aubrey Deering, of District #93, Bouda rose, and declared "I will vote against the Constitution, for my own personal, moral reasons. Also, I wish to remind Senator Friedrich Wilhelm von Hohenzollern of Mulenhaim and Senator Branko Aleksic that all Senators are entitled to their own beliefs. No member of this body, is any less "freedom loving" because of their views, and as colleagues their views deserve equal respect. Please, gentlemen, I beg that we stay polite and professional to each other. I ask the gentlemen to retract their statements."


"I have made no violation of the PPUBA or any sort of Senatorial Ethics guideline because I have made no personal attacks against you nor anyone else. I will not be retracting my statements on the subject."
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:47 pm

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
Pesda wrote:Not at all.

OOC talking they will. Every single constituency may try to secede and what not.
And seeing you support self determination what is your opinion on the Crimean referendum?

What's happening in Crimea is secession by gunpoint. It's also against their constitution. I will not support it as long as Russia is puppeteering as it is.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:54 pm

Lamaredia wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:OOC talking they will. Every single constituency may try to secede and what not.
And seeing you support self determination what is your opinion on the Crimean referendum?

What's happening in Crimea is secession by gunpoint. It's also against their constitution. I will not support it as long as Russia is puppeteering as it is.

I would have drawn parallels with another secession but I do not want to get into such arguments by nationalists present in the senate. It happened 7 years ago. And was used in the declaration of independence of the Crimea. And also the constitution of the previous country did not allow for secessions
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:02 pm

Unicario wrote:
The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:When does the voting on the Constitution start? I'm voting for, but with the reservation that I would like to see it amended so that life is defined as starting at conception.


Hahahahaha, no.

If any such thing is put in the Constitution, I will fervently campaign for every freedom-loving member of the Senate to reject it.

You can be a bit less provocative, which is a PPUBA violation, but I won't say much more than that.

And everyone can stand to not go that route either.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Pesda
Minister
 
Posts: 2988
Founded: Jun 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pesda » Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:02 pm

Can we vote now?
St George of England wrote:
Pesda wrote:Alchohol has a funny taste
So does semen.
Professional Leaders wrote:
Neo-Sincostan wrote:Nah mate I live in Scotland. Or, as I dislike relating it to, the UK.
thats cool i like ireland
Interstellar Britannia wrote:And indeed, cavemen are fully capable of writing books. Have you heard of the Communist Manifesto perchance?
Green Ham wrote:
Pesda wrote:Making someone happy.

I advise lubricant if that's your objective. Or spit.
Kheil HaAvir wrote:i sleep with a poster above
Welsh speaking Plaid Cymru and SNP supporter.
Left -5.75 Lib -6.05
Why I voted for Plaid Cymru
Now a student... In England

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:18 pm

Haelunor wrote:Any anti-abortion ammendment will tank the whole thing.

This^. Abortion should not have been brought up right now. If restricting it is important to anyone, they can propose an amendment after the constitution is passed. We've gone too long without a constitution.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The State of Czecho-Slovakia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:26 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:
The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:I'm sorry if I'm getting bent out of shape about this, but this kind of behaviour really gets my goat. I need a break for a bit, I'll be back on tomorrow. Please TG me if you have anything urgent I ought to know about.

Senator, I don't see what any of us have done other than disagree with you.


My complaints were generally against Unicario, and Macedonian Empire, not the whole of my critics. I don't mind senators such as yourself who can present dissent in a professional manner, but those who are rude about it irk me. I just want people to keep it civil here, and respect others opinions.
Last edited by The State of Czecho-Slovakia on Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Player Since 2012

User avatar
Corenea
Senator
 
Posts: 4781
Founded: Oct 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Corenea » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:27 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Haelunor wrote:Any anti-abortion ammendment will tank the whole thing.

This^. Abortion should not have been brought up right now. If restricting it is important to anyone, they can propose an amendment after the constitution is passed. We've gone too long without a constitution.

I'm agreeing with Geil (probably for the first time) I'm perfectly fine with the proposed Constitution as it is and we need the Constitution now
Just call me Cor
Economic Left/Right: 5.50
Social Left/Right: -1.33
On the American Revolution
Assault weapons
The Korean-American Tea Partier, I promise not to be whatever evil thing the Tea Party is accused of being right now. I don't care who you are, if you're not a jerk, then we won't have any problem
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" - Winston Churchill
How to handle bullying problem

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:42 pm

The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:Senator, I don't see what any of us have done other than disagree with you.


My complaints were generally against Unicario, and Macedonian Empire, not the whole of my critics. I don't mind senators such as yourself who can present dissent in a professional manner, but those who are rude about it irk me. I just want people to keep it civil here, and respect others opinions.

I said before. No just No is a mocking of believes?
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
The State of Czecho-Slovakia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:44 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Haelunor wrote:Any anti-abortion ammendment will tank the whole thing.

This^. Abortion should not have been brought up right now. If restricting it is important to anyone, they can propose an amendment after the constitution is passed. We've gone too long without a constitution.


This was the point I was trying to present in my initial post: I was considering voting for the Conn., but making it clear in my post that I wished that it be amended later. Honestly, it'll take some time before I decide where I stand on this issue. It's not easy deciding whether I should vote on the basis of what I feel is moral right, or for what I feel is politically right and realistic. I'm going to take another look at the Conn., and consult some historical texts and my confandants before coming to a firm decision.
Player Since 2012

User avatar
The State of Czecho-Slovakia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:55 pm

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:
My complaints were generally against Unicario, and Macedonian Empire, not the whole of my critics. I don't mind senators such as yourself who can present dissent in a professional manner, but those who are rude about it irk me. I just want people to keep it civil here, and respect others opinions.

I said before. No just No is a mocking of believes?


My complaints were, I admit, most relevant to Unicarnio. I apologize, I should not have put you in the same class as him. While, I'll be frank, your remarks upset me, they were not as serious as those Unicarno made. I withdraw my complaints against you, but would ask that in the future your criticisms be a touch more erudite. Let us for the time being to agree to disagree.

Edited to fix pronoun, went neutral because I was playing it safe.
Last edited by The State of Czecho-Slovakia on Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Player Since 2012

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:09 pm

The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:I said before. No just No is a mocking of believes?


While, I'll be frank, your remarks upset me

"No, just no" upset you? Macedonian Empire highly disagreed, and said so.
Last edited by Geilinor on Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:26 pm

The State of Czecho-Slovakia wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:I said before. No just No is a mocking of believes?


My complaints were, I admit, most relevant to Unicarnio. I apologize, I should not have put you in the same class as zim. While, I'll be frank, your remarks upset me, they were not as serious as those Unicarno made. I withdraw my complaints against you, but would ask that in the future your criticisms be a touch more erudite. Let us for the time being to agree to disagree.


My remarks were serious in what way? It's not as if I called you something derogatory or offensive. And please use the proper gender pronoun with me -- masculine. my "haha, no." was more for dramatic effect than it was to insult your beliefs.

At this end, I see no reason why this needs to continue when there are more important matters at hand.
Last edited by Unicario on Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:10 am

May the records show, zim is not a word.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
New Bierstaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 849
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bierstaat » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:05 am

Corenea wrote:
Geilinor wrote:This^. Abortion should not have been brought up right now. If restricting it is important to anyone, they can propose an amendment after the constitution is passed. We've gone too long without a constitution.

I'm agreeing with Geil (probably for the first time) I'm perfectly fine with the proposed Constitution as it is and we need the Constitution now

Indeed. It should be clear that it has strong support across both coalitions and will likely pass by a wide margin. I could see it getting 70-75%.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28

Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:39 am

New Bierstaat wrote:
Corenea wrote:I'm agreeing with Geil (probably for the first time) I'm perfectly fine with the proposed Constitution as it is and we need the Constitution now

Indeed. It should be clear that it has strong support across both coalitions and will likely pass by a wide margin. I could see it getting 70-75%.

And one superb way to tank it is for some Senators' to tack their anti-abortion agendas on to it.

This constitution is the work of Senators from across the political spectrum who toiled since our nation's independence to create a solid and neutral governing document. If someone wishes to see it amended for their own purposes then they can use the amending formula once it is passed.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:23 am

This constitution has been written under the administrations of three Presidents, through bloodshed and brutality, through hardship and hostility, through the very history that defines Aurentina's independence. We must now stand together to support the work of countless senators and presidents, some of whom are no longer amongst us.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:56 am

Fellow Senators,

I come before you as a member of the convention responsible for drafting this constitution, who ceased participation in the drafting of the constitution some time ago because I resolved to vote against it regardless of what happened next. I wish to explain in detail why I and my party will be voting against the new constitution in the chamber, despite insistences that it is fair and neutral and has bipartisan support.

The reason we oppose this constitution is not because it does not recognise Aurentina as a constitutional monarchy as we desire, despite false and disingenuous reports to the contrary. We recognise that there is no support for the traditional system of government in the Commonwealth at present, and though we regret this we have no wish to force our views on an unwilling populace. This is, however, exactly what this constitution's drafting committee, overwhelmingly republican in composition, is doing to the people of those Aurentine provinces where support for the hereditary principle and native aristocracy remains high. Myself and the sadly absent Senator de Medici proposed several months ago that the constitution, which adopts a federal system for Aurentina's provinces, should provide for the establishment of hereditary chief executives in those regions where majority support for them might occur, thus allowing traditionally-minded provinces to opt to allow local ducal or comital families to serve a role in their local government.

In no way would this agreement infringe upon the democratic will of the majority of the Commonwealth's population to remain a republic, nor would it violate the rights of the inhabitants of those provinces in question as subnational monarchies of this sort, which exist in many places around the world already, would require the support of the local population to be established and would remain answerable to local legislative assemblies and the national government. Yet this proposal was refused by the majority of the constitutional convention, who favoured upholding the republican ideal even where it did not correspond with the local democratic will. This is an example of tyranny by majority, and I fear that the national government running roughshod over the rights and will of provincial governments and populations in this way will only fuel support for secessionist movements such as the one which has recently resorted to terroristic actions in Arenden. It is for this reason that I and my fellow party members remain steadfastly opposed to the proposed constitution, which we feel is not so politically unbiased as our opponents claim.

If the Senate of Aurentina is unwilling to allow this small concession to a significant minority of the electoral caucus, for the sake of passing the first ever bill in Aurentine history with genuinely universal support and establishing a constitution that genuinely has the approval of every party in the Senate, I fear that this nation may not be so tolerant of dissenting voices as it prides itself on being.

Long live the Queen and the people of Aurentina.
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Central and Eastern Visayas
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5214
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Central and Eastern Visayas » Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:03 pm

And a tyranny by majority is the most ironic of tyrannies.
If believing in God means I am less than human in the eyes of some, fine; I will wear my yellow badge with pride.

TIMEZONE: GMT +8
1. In a gunless society, the strong prey on the weak with utter impunity.
2. Yes, I'm a Roman Catholic from the Philippines. And I know how much ass PH sucks at the moment.
3. Bastard with ADHD. Yep.
4. PDAF can go to hell!
Economic Left/Right: 6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.49
Or: This.

User avatar
New Bierstaat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 849
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bierstaat » Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:38 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:Fellow Senators,

I come before you as a member of the convention responsible for drafting this constitution, who ceased participation in the drafting of the constitution some time ago because I resolved to vote against it regardless of what happened next. I wish to explain in detail why I and my party will be voting against the new constitution in the chamber, despite insistences that it is fair and neutral and has bipartisan support.

The reason we oppose this constitution is not because it does not recognise Aurentina as a constitutional monarchy as we desire, despite false and disingenuous reports to the contrary. We recognise that there is no support for the traditional system of government in the Commonwealth at present, and though we regret this we have no wish to force our views on an unwilling populace. This is, however, exactly what this constitution's drafting committee, overwhelmingly republican in composition, is doing to the people of those Aurentine provinces where support for the hereditary principle and native aristocracy remains high. Myself and the sadly absent Senator de Medici proposed several months ago that the constitution, which adopts a federal system for Aurentina's provinces, should provide for the establishment of hereditary chief executives in those regions where majority support for them might occur, thus allowing traditionally-minded provinces to opt to allow local ducal or comital families to serve a role in their local government.

In no way would this agreement infringe upon the democratic will of the majority of the Commonwealth's population to remain a republic, nor would it violate the rights of the inhabitants of those provinces in question as subnational monarchies of this sort, which exist in many places around the world already, would require the support of the local population to be established and would remain answerable to local legislative assemblies and the national government. Yet this proposal was refused by the majority of the constitutional convention, who favoured upholding the republican ideal even where it did not correspond with the local democratic will. This is an example of tyranny by majority, and I fear that the national government running roughshod over the rights and will of provincial governments and populations in this way will only fuel support for secessionist movements such as the one which has recently resorted to terroristic actions in Arenden. It is for this reason that I and my fellow party members remain steadfastly opposed to the proposed constitution, which we feel is not so politically unbiased as our opponents claim.

If the Senate of Aurentina is unwilling to allow this small concession to a significant minority of the electoral caucus, for the sake of passing the first ever bill in Aurentine history with genuinely universal support and establishing a constitution that genuinely has the approval of every party in the Senate, I fear that this nation may not be so tolerant of dissenting voices as it prides itself on being.

Long live the Queen and the people of Aurentina.

I don't see a problem with this, but I think it would make more sense to have it done as an amendment than to try to change the constitution now right before it's slated to be voted upon.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28

Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:43 pm

subnational monarchies of this sort, which exist in many places around the world already

OOC: So Uganda and OAE? And that is many places?
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:00 pm

I don't see a problem with this, but I think it would make more sense to have it done as an amendment than to try to change the constitution now right before it's slated to be voted upon.


I agree, I'd even be willing to Co-Author said amendment.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:09 pm

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:
subnational monarchies of this sort, which exist in many places around the world already

OOC: So Uganda and OAE? And that is many places?

Uganda, Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates, Ghana, Nigeria, India, the Phillipines, South Africa... And more.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_su ... l_monarchs
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:16 pm

Yanalia wrote:This has sufficient support for the queue.

Aircraft Carrier Restriction Act
Drafted by: Yanalia [RG]
Sponsors: Unicario [RG], Costa Fierro [RefP], Osea 767 [CP], Pesda [RG], Skeckoa [LP]
Category: International Relations

The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,

RECOGNISING that the nation does not currently require an aircraft carrier,

DISAPPROVING of the plans of the current government to purchase one,

NOTING that the Senate should voice its opinion on such an expensive and significant project,

ALARMED that the government has ignored protest against the purchase of an aircraft carrier,

HEREBY enacts the following:

For the purposes of this act, an aircraft carrier shall be a warship with a full-length flight deck and facilities for carrying, arming, deploying, and recovering aircraft, that serves as a seagoing airbase.

1. Any current projects on the part of the Ministry of Defence involving the acquisition of aircraft carriers shall be halted immediately.

2. Acquisitions of aircraft carriers shall require the approval of the Senate.


Code: Select all
[spoiler=Aircraft Carrier Restriction Act][box][size=150]Aircraft Carrier Restriction Act[/size]
Drafted by: Yanalia [RG]
Sponsors: Unicario [RG], Costa Fierro [RefP], Osea 767 [CP], Pesda [RG], Skeckoa [LP]
Category: International Relations

The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,

RECOGNISING that the nation does not currently require an aircraft carrier,

DISAPPROVING of the plans of the current government to purchase one,

NOTING that the Senate should voice its opinion on such an expensive and significant project,

ALARMED that the government has ignored protest against the purchase of an aircraft carrier,

HEREBY enacts the following:

For the purposes of this act, an aircraft carrier shall be a warship with a full-length flight deck and facilities for carrying, arming, deploying, and recovering aircraft, that serves as a seagoing airbase.

1. Any current projects on the part of the Ministry of Defence involving the acquisition of aircraft carriers shall be halted immediately.

2. Acquisitions of aircraft carriers shall require the approval of the Senate.[/box][/spoiler]
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads