NATION

PASSWORD

New Democratic Party [NSG Senate | HQ]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

If we were to reboot the Senate as a Baltic nation, what name should the NDP have?

New Democrats
2
6%
Liberal Democrats
12
39%
Social Democrats
15
48%
Moderate Left
2
6%
Other (please leave suggestion on thread)
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 31

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:13 pm

Next Washington wrote:as i observed this discussion for some time i decided to do some maths concerning the progress coalition...

... so here#s my result:

NDP+NCP+RefP+SLP=47%

new democratic party+reform party+libertarian party of aurentina+national centre party=50,99%.... +slp (10 membes when official party)=53,80%...


Well in that case, the current idea is too small for a majority.
While adding the Libertarians would give us a ''slight majority'', I refuse to support any coalition with Libertarians, if that is the idea I will oppose it.
The current Coalition is fine, we have a clear majority, over 60%, no coalition is perfect Brit, there will always be some factions you don't agree with, as much as you'd like to.
Last edited by Neo Rome Republic on Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:20 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:18 pm

Britanno wrote:
Bering wrote:How will leaving the Progressive Coalition benefit the party?


It will mean that we can remain in a powerful coalition that has the most members.

We loose a third of the Senate if we leave the Coalition
We will have a very good chance of getting into governemnt.

We have a government now, that we dominate AND with the size of the coaltion we will not have to worry about losing that
We will alienate extremists.

Still not sure how they hurt us seeing as they mostly toe the line and if they get too crazy we can put them down, they know they will not be able to get into the government without this coalition and understand that it is better than getting the Right-Wingers in charge
We willnot have to compromise our beliefs like some suggest.

How can you be sure? Will the parties involved agree to our current Party Platform?
(Edit: and a list of possible coalition members)


NDP
NCP
RefP
SLP

Which as stated before fails to give us the majority and none of the jump out as too similar to us
On the other hand the Market Socialists and Red-Greens are fairly close allies ideologically speaking
Last edited by Bering on Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:20 pm

NEO Rome Republic wrote:
Next Washington wrote:as i observed this discussion for some time i decided to do some maths concerning the progress coalition...

... so here#s my result:

NDP+NCP+RefP+SLP=47%

new democratic party+reform party+libertarian party of aurentina+national centre party=50,99%.... +slp (10 membes when official party)=53,80%...


Well in that case, the current idea is too small for a majority.
While adding the Libertarians would give us a ''slight majority'', I refuse to support any coalition with Libertarians, if that is the idea I will oppose it.
The current Coalition is fine, we have a clear majority, over 60%, no coalition is perfect Brit, there will always be some factions you don't agree with, as much as you'd like to.

Most people in the party are against adding in the Libertarians, so the current model will fail

User avatar
Next Washington
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 442
Founded: Apr 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Next Washington » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:21 pm

Bering wrote:We loose a third of the Senate if we leave the Coalition


why we? ok, our party is the largest, but it sounds like we control everything...
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - RR
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government." - AG
Factbook Military Statistics
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

User avatar
Fulflood
Diplomat
 
Posts: 645
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fulflood » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:22 pm

Bering wrote:
NEO Rome Republic wrote:
Well in that case, the current idea is too small for a majority.
While adding the Libertarians would give us a ''slight majority'', I refuse to support any coalition with Libertarians, if that is the idea I will oppose it.
The current Coalition is fine, we have a clear majority, over 60%, no coalition is perfect Brit, there will always be some factions you don't agree with, as much as you'd like to.

Most people in the party are against adding in the Libertarians, so the current model will fail

I'd be just about OK with it, I just think there are clearly better options such as the Red-Greens. It's a shame there's no good centre-right party anymore.
I go under the name Vyvland now (IIWiki page). This account is used for the odd foray into the Senate or NSG.
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal

Admin, New Democrat member for Lüborg (504) and ambassador to the Red-Greens in the Aurentine Senate. Minister of Business Safety of Aurentina. Apparently that deserves a ministry, but I'm not complaining. I'm probably none of these things anymore. | The Aurentine Phrasebook, my magnum opus.

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:23 pm

Out of interest, if, say, the MSP were also added in, would you support it?

By the way, all those percentages are out of date. The senate has 711 members.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:24 pm

Next Washington wrote:
Bering wrote:We loose a third of the Senate if we leave the Coalition


why we? ok, our party is the largest, but it sounds like we control everything...

I meant we loose a third of the senate as possible allies

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:26 pm

Fulflood wrote:I'd be just about OK with it, I just think there are clearly better options such as the Red-Greens. It's a shame there's no good centre-right party anymore.


Indeed, but there are few active ones left.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:26 pm

Fulflood wrote:
Bering wrote:Most people in the party are against adding in the Libertarians, so the current model will fail

I'd be just about OK with it, I just think there are clearly better options such as the Red-Greens. It's a shame there's no good centre-right party anymore.

Honestly IF the Far-Left does get really crazy we could probably convince the Market Socialists and Red-Greens to form a Coalition with us and from there we could find a few more parties to gain the needed majority

User avatar
Next Washington
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 442
Founded: Apr 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Next Washington » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:26 pm

Britanno wrote:Out of interest, if, say, the MSP were also added in, would you support it?

By the way, all those percentages are out of date. The senate has 711 members.


711??? i only counted 355, so the half...

who has more? as this could mean our current coalition could be below 50%...

(i didn't count the independent senators)
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - RR
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government." - AG
Factbook Military Statistics
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:26 pm

At this point in time I'm not sure leaving the ProgCoa is the best idea.
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:28 pm

New Zepuha wrote:At this point in time I'm not sure leaving the ProgCoa is the best idea.

I think everyone here except Britanno (and maybe a few others) agree

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:28 pm

Next Washington wrote:
Britanno wrote:Out of interest, if, say, the MSP were also added in, would you support it?

By the way, all those percentages are out of date. The senate has 711 members.


711??? i only counted 355, so the half...

who has more? as this could mean our current coalition could be below 50%...

(i didn't count the independent senators)


I went through all the applications threads (with a bit if help from Fulflood) and there were 711 senators.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:29 pm

Bering wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:At this point in time I'm not sure leaving the ProgCoa is the best idea.

I think everyone here except Britanno (and maybe a few others) agree


Indeed, only 3 currently support our withdrawal.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:29 pm

Britanno wrote:
Next Washington wrote:
711??? i only counted 355, so the half...

who has more? as this could mean our current coalition could be below 50%...

(i didn't count the independent senators)


I went through all the applications threads (with a bit if help from Fulflood) and there were 711 senators.

Not all of them are still Senators
You realize that right?

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:31 pm

Britanno wrote:
Bering wrote:I think everyone here except Britanno (and maybe a few others) agree


Indeed, only 3 currently support our withdrawal.

I don't mean to be pushy but could you respond to my response to your reasons?
it is one post from the top of this page
Last edited by Bering on Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:31 pm

Bering wrote:Not all of them are still Senators
You realize that right?


Some are inactive yes, but inactivity doesn't mean you are no longer a senator.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Next Washington
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 442
Founded: Apr 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Next Washington » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:31 pm

New Zepuha wrote:At this point in time I'm not sure leaving the ProgCoa is the best idea.


i, personally, am not for really leaving it... but re-thinking it...
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - RR
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government." - AG
Factbook Military Statistics
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

User avatar
Next Washington
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 442
Founded: Apr 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Next Washington » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:33 pm

Britanno wrote:
Bering wrote:Not all of them are still Senators
You realize that right?


Some are inactive yes, but inactivity doesn't mean you are no longer a senator.


in this party are more than 100 senators, since im here there are about 10 active...
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - RR
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government." - AG
Factbook Military Statistics
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:34 pm

Next Washington wrote:
Britanno wrote:
Some are inactive yes, but inactivity doesn't mean you are no longer a senator.


in this party are more than 100 senators, since im here there are about 10 active...

Yeah, honestly counting people who are no longer active and no longer listed as Senators is a bad idea

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:35 pm

Divair wrote:
Britanno wrote:What makes you so sure that the centre-right doesn't want to work with you?

So the CMP, Reform, and the libertarians would go for this platform in its entirety?

I'll take that as a "no".

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:35 pm

Divair wrote:
Divair wrote:So the CMP, Reform, and the libertarians would go for this platform in its entirety?

I'll take that as a "no".

That's probably a safe bet

User avatar
New Democratic Party of Aurentina
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Democratic Party of Aurentina » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:35 pm

Last vote counted. The council has ruled in favour of the ProgCo unanimously.

User avatar
Bering
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12712
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bering » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:36 pm

New Democratic Party of Aurentina wrote:Last vote counted. The council has ruled in favour of the ProgCo unanimously.

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
One for each of you

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:38 pm

Bering wrote:We have a government now, that we dominate AND with the size of the coaltion we will not have to worry about losing that.


What is to stop a MSP-NDP-NCP-SLP-RefP coalition from winning an election?

Still not sure how they hurt us seeing as they mostly toe the line and if they get too crazy we can put them down, they know they will not be able to get into the government without this coalition and understand that it is better than getting the Right-Wingers in charge.


You are missing the point, without a centrist coalition, extremists will get into government no matter what. If the right wings, fascists get in, if the left wins, communists get in. I want to stop either from getting into government, because I think keeping moderates in and extremists out is important.

How can you be sure? Will the parties involved agree to our current Party Platform?


As said before, the idea would be to have an economic platform where neither side would have to sacrifice or compromise their beliefs and would be solely based around the things they agree on.

Which as stated before fails to give us the majority and none of the jump out as too similar to us. On the other hand the Market Socialists and Red-Greens are fairly close allies ideologically speaking.


I could deal with the MSP, but some of the RGs are way took left wing.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads