Advertisement

by People Who Say Ni » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:11 pm
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:12 pm
People Who Say Ni wrote:I don't support everything Gillard/Rudd did. Their immigration policies, early stance on gay marriage and excessive expenditure were horrible. The problem is that I find the CURRENT ALP to be better than the CURRENT LNP.

by People Who Say Ni » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:23 pm
The pathetic behavior of those in the party and the sheer stupidity of many of their other ideas.
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

by Kamchastkia » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:33 pm

by Ikania » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:45 pm
Corenea wrote:Isn't the New Democratic Party a real party in Canada, competing against the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party?


by Geilinor » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:49 pm
Beta Test wrote:People Who Say Ni wrote:
Turnbull never had the chance to lead the country. The Menzies-Holt days echoed the current ALP political compass position and Fraser said himself that Abbott is the most dangerous politician in Aussie history.
Bob Hawke and Paul Keating flooded our economy, created universal healthcare and are widely regarded as the best government the country ever had. Julia Gillard issued reforms in almost every sector, from health, education, infrastructure and the internet. The "leaders" of our country now seem to be more interested in wrecking the place than anything else. Abbott's entire election campaign hinged on stopping boat people( a ghastly policy which doesn't even work), replacing the carbon tax with the direct action plan which PAYS polluters with our taxes instead, trying to save money on a better broadband policy which is not only 40 times slower than the ALPs, but, when adding up maintenance costs, is MORE expensive as well. Kevin Rudd's government saved us from the GFC, having us as the only country which was effected not to have had a significant environmental impact. If Labor (who can't spell) just sat around and did nothing for the entire term, their economic skills (with the exception of the mining tax blowout) should have gotten them a re-election on that basis ALONE. Remember that Abbott is himself a boat person with an openly gay sister, and he won't even fight for basic marriage equality. I believe in the shinier of two turds, Beta, and if you take the time to read this little article, I'm sure you'll agree that there is no excrement duller than the Liberal Party Of Australia (who can spell, but don't know how to use a dictionary.)
![]()
![]()
![]()
I never said Abbott did I?

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:51 pm

by The Scientific States » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:55 pm

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:55 pm
People Who Say Ni wrote:The pathetic behavior of those in the party and the sheer stupidity of many of their other ideas.
I'm not quite sure what you're referencing here. If you're talking about the Rudd/Gillard backstabbing, it is no different to that of the Turnbull/Abbott divide - not to mention, there is talk of Julie Bishop challenging Abbott as leader of the LNP. There are idiots allthroughout the LNP: the minister Against the Environment who didn't believe in climate change until he became minister, the minister for Ruining the Internet who refuses to listen to the millions of Australians who prefer a FTTP NBN, the Minister For Pharmaceutical Income (health) who openly insults "lefties" and the aboriginals or the minister for Nautical Discrimination who refuses to even discuss his policies. Not to mention the disgusting behavior of senator Cory Bernadi, the Cardboard-Rudd incident or the fact that Abbott was the first opposition leader of the century to get expelled from the parliament (and the countless times he tried to run from the parliament in order to nullify a vote). Also, I'm genuinely interested in hearing some of these stupid ideas.

by People Who Say Ni » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:09 pm
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:10 pm


by People Who Say Ni » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:17 pm
Beta Test wrote:Ever heard of spoilers?
EDIT: Thank you.
As I go back to my original point, there's no outstanding need for one.
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:21 pm
People Who Say Ni wrote:Beta Test wrote:Ever heard of spoilers?
EDIT: Thank you.
As I go back to my original point, there's no outstanding need for one.
But the LNP will install one anyway, which will be more expensive, up to 40 times slower, provide no revenue and wont help business as much at the alps

by Geilinor » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:25 pm
Beta Test wrote:As I go back to my original point, there's no outstanding need for one.

by Great Franconia and Verana » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:26 pm

by Beta Test » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:27 pm
Geilinor wrote:Beta Test wrote:As I go back to my original point, there's no outstanding need for one.
It will bring jobs and benefits in the future. http://www.zdnet.com/labor-wins-industry-speaks-1339305869/ That's the point of investments. Money now, returns later.

by People Who Say Ni » Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:50 pm
Beta Test wrote:Geilinor wrote:It will bring jobs and benefits in the future. http://www.zdnet.com/labor-wins-industry-speaks-1339305869/ That's the point of investments. Money now, returns later.
I guess. But still, it costs so bleeding much.
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%

by Soviet Canuckistan » Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:36 am

by The Nihilistic view » Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:08 am
People Who Say Ni wrote:Beta Test wrote:We don't need this NBN
Sure about that?
If anything, Aurentina needs one as well.

by New Bierstaat » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:10 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Man do you ever stop going on about how the government should pay for you to get stupidly fast broadband? Last time I checked one does not need 400 mb broadband to survive. I have 20 mb/s here at uni and everything loads virtually instantly, I would not pay for 400 mb/s if I was a billionaire. It's just ridiculously excessive.
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
by Ainin » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:21 am
Metre Act
Author: Ainin [NDP] | Urgency: Low | SIMBEDS: Business and Finance
Sponsors: Maklohi Vai [NDP], Unicario [RG]
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
Declaring:"Metre" (m) is a unit of length to be as long as defined by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, currently being the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.
"Kilogramme" (kg) is a unit of weight to be defined as the same as the weight as the International Prototype Kilogram, as determined by the International Bureau for Weights and Measures.
"Litre" (l) is a unit of volume to be defined as equal to 1/1000 cubic metre.
Ratifying the Metre Convention of 1875,
Hereby enacts the Metre Act.

by Maklohi Vai » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:29 am

by Unicario » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:42 am
Ainin wrote:Metre Act
The Senate of the Aurentine Commonwealth,
Declaring:"Metre" (m) is a unit of length to be as long as defined by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, currently being the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.
"Kilogramme" (kg) is a unit of weight to be defined as the same as the weight as the International Prototype Kilogram, as determined by the International Bureau for Weights and Measures.
"Litre" (l) is a unit of volume to be defined as equal to 1/1000 cubic metre.
Ratifying the Metre Convention of 1875,
Hereby enacts the Metre Act.
))Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement