New Democratic Party [NSG Senate | HQ]

[Costa Alegria]

The SAP is voting against our gun bill. That's bullshit.

[Divair]

The SAP is voting against our gun bill. That's bullshit.

So? Gun control is a free vote.

[Ainin]

Please go to the link below and claim your party's HQ.

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=264075

I think our headquarters should be a 2km² complex with five Olympic swimming pools, an indoor football field, a giant museum with a 1:1 reproduction of the USS Nimitz and... nah just kidding.

I say we take a small 3-story brick building near Senate Plaza. Thoughts?

[Mkuki]

Please go to the link below and claim your party's HQ.

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=264075

I think our headquarters should be a 2km² complex with five Olympic swimming pools, an indoor football field, a giant museum with a 1:1 reproduction of the USS Nimitz and... nah just kidding.

I say we take a small 3-story brick building near Senate Plaza. Thoughts?

With an old rocket nearby? Please?

[Divair]

Please go to the link below and claim your party's HQ.

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=264075

I think our headquarters should be a 2km² complex with five Olympic swimming pools, an indoor football field, a giant museum with a 1:1 reproduction of the USS Nimitz and... nah just kidding.

I say we take a small 3-story brick building near Senate Plaza. Thoughts?

We should probably have the largest office of all the parties. We are the largest party by a huge margin, after all. Something fancy and spacious, but not too luxurious.

[Costa Alegria]

So? Gun control is a free vote.

And who's brilliant idea was that, hmm? Which idiot decided on that?

[Britanno]

HQ idea...

http://i.imgur.com/anIbYMj.png

[Divair]

So? Gun control is a free vote.

And who's brilliant idea was that, hmm? Which idiot decided on that?

The coalition decided on that months ago.

[Mkuki]

The SAP is voting against our gun bill. That's bullshit.

You're surprised?

[Costa Alegria]

The coalition decided on that months ago.

Well congrats on being a retarded coalition then. What's the point of being in a coalition if you don't actually have any control over voting in it?

[Ainin]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

[Divair]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

Suburbs it is.

[Costa Alegria]

You're surprised?

I'd have at least thought they'd have enough courtesy to show support for the coalition rather than waltz in and demand we bow to their demands.

[Mkuki]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

Can we still have a rocket? I was thinking Saturn V. That or Titan IIIE.

[Mkuki]

You're surprised?

I'd have at least thought they'd have enough courtesy to show support for the coalition rather than waltz in and demand we bow to their demands.

Where are they demanding that?

[Soviet Canuckistan]

The coalition decided on that months ago.

Well congrats on being a retarded coalition then. What's the point of being in a coalition if you don't actually have any control over voting in it?

Because no one wants to join a coalition that's too strict and that the coalition is based mostly on a certain part of the political spectrum instead of other issues. The coalition also represents diverse views on many issues instead of just one. If you have a problem with the current coalition, go form your own party and make your own coalition.

[Costa Alegria]

Where are they demanding that?

When they first joined. They asked for a ministry and we gave it to them. They put up a bad candidate for the minister and got all shitty when everyone else said no.

[Soviet Canuckistan]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

Why not some offices in the gov. district as a mini-HQ and a large complex in the suburbs as a larger-HQ?

[Mkuki]

Where are they demanding that?

When they first joined. They asked for a ministry and we gave it to them. They put up a bad candidate for the minister and got all shitty when everyone else said no.

What does that have to do with the bill you're complaining about?

[Divair]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

Why not some offices in the gov. district as a mini-HQ and a large complex in the suburbs as a larger-HQ?

That could work.

[Soviet Canuckistan]

When they first joined. They asked for a ministry and we gave it to them. They put up a bad candidate for the minister and got all shitty when everyone else said no.

What does that have to do with the bill you're complaining about?

Costa just hates everyone who has a different opinion so he'll critique anyone who has a different opinion then him, even if it was a past issue and isn't relevant to the discussion.

[Costa Alegria]

Because no one wants to join a coalition that's too strict.

Making a compulsory vote on gun laws isn't too strict at all. There's nothing wrong with the bill, but because they're a bunch of idiot reactionaries, they don't vote for it becase "we need teh gunz to prottct urselves frm dem evil rightists".

If you have a problem with the current coalition, go form your own party and make your own coalition.

No. I'd rather remove unnecessary cancerous lumps from the coalition to make it truly progressive.

[Soviet Canuckistan]

Because no one wants to join a coalition that's too strict.

Making a compulsory vote on gun laws isn't too strict at all. There's nothing wrong with the bill, but because they're a bunch of idiot reactionaries, they don't vote for it becase "we need teh gunz to prottct urselves frm dem evil rightists".

If you have a problem with the current coalition, go form your own party and make your own coalition.

No. I'd rather remove unnecessary cancerous lumps from the coalition to make it truly progressive.

Any compulsory vote is a strict one. Even our party has no compulsory votes so that everyone has the freedom to vote how they wish, shouldn't other coalition members have this form of freedom of expression.

If we need to remove unnecessary cancerous lumps to make the coalition progressive, I'd remove you first since you continue to impede progress by constantly disrespecting others and their different opinions.

[Britanno]

It was determined that the government district only had historic buildings, so our headquarters, if it was modern, would have to be somewhere in the suburbs.

My suggestion wasn't entirely modern.

[Costa Alegria]

What does that have to do with the bill you're complaining about?

Because I'd have expected them to pull their weight in the coalition if they want to prove themselves useful. I was against the USLP joining from the start and the bastard child of that party still has me wary. I'm fine with the Red-Greens. I'm fine with the one-man-band that is the Communist Party but I don't like the SAP, it's policies, it's history and it's membership.

Costa just hates everyone who has a different opinion so he'll critique anyone who has a different opinion then him, even if it was a past issue and isn't relevant to the discussion.

I'm fine with people's opinions. It's voting against a bill designed to make the lives of people safer because of reactionary bullshit because the SAP is scared of everyone that isn't communist that pisses me off.