Advertisement
by Grenartia » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:58 am
by Camelza » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:59 am
Transnapastain wrote:Camelza wrote:Actually, she went briefly under the name St. Lo and that was her name by the time she sunk ...it was previously named USS Midway.
See, what we have here is a failure to specific.
Though I should have figured it out, you were talking about the USS Midway CVE-63), where as I was talking about the USS Midway CV-41. Mah bad.
Entirely different ships.
by Arglorand » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:00 am
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:03 am
Arglorand wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Soviet cinema is best cinema! But seriously, quite a few excellent movies were made in the Soviet Union. Enjoy!
Indeed. I find cinema to be one of the USSR's strong sides. And New Year's Eve just can't go without the Irony of Fate, so even on the extremely low off-chance that they won't show it when said holiday rolls around I'll be able to watch it.Grenartia wrote:
Soviet comedies were good?
The only Soviet TV/film production I'm aware of that was any good was the film adaptation of Tom Sawyer.
They used to be brilliant, actually.
The one I linked in this post, for example, I strongly recommend watching if you can find a subbed version. Preferably during the winter holidays.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Arglorand » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:04 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Arglorand wrote:Indeed. I find cinema to be one of the USSR's strong sides. And New Year's Eve just can't go without the Irony of Fate, so even on the extremely low off-chance that they won't show it when said holiday rolls around I'll be able to watch it.
They used to be brilliant, actually.
The one I linked in this post, for example, I strongly recommend watching if you can find a subbed version. Preferably during the winter holidays.
The Soviets already had romcoms in the seventies? They were closer to world domination than I previously thought!
by Auremena » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:05 am
by Grenartia » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:17 am
Arglorand wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Soviet cinema is best cinema! But seriously, quite a few excellent movies were made in the Soviet Union. Enjoy!
Indeed. I find cinema to be one of the USSR's strong sides. And New Year's Eve just can't go without the Irony of Fate, so even on the extremely low off-chance that they won't show it when said holiday rolls around I'll be able to watch it.Grenartia wrote:
Soviet comedies were good?
The only Soviet TV/film production I'm aware of that was any good was the film adaptation of Tom Sawyer.
They used to be brilliant, actually.
The one I linked in this post, for example, I strongly recommend watching if you can find a subbed version. Preferably during the winter holidays.
by Grenartia » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:18 am
Auremena wrote:I'm ready to just completely knock down a wall right now. 1 of 11 days now, I have successfully woken up on time. I wasn't going to even sleep last night, because at 7 in the working I can't sleep, and I want to be up at 8, it just makes sense not to. But somehow I do fall asleep, sleep right through all 3 alarms I've set, and wake up again at 1130, like every other time.
by The Armed Republic of Dutch Coolness » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:25 am
P2TM Mentor
by Napkiraly » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:27 am
Divair wrote:Napkiraly wrote:His smartphone strategy was a disaster for Nokia however. Nokia's problems aren't all Elop's fault, but he also didn't really magically make everything better either and I'd prefer someone else to take care of Microsoft.
How was his smartphone strategy a disaster? Before he came along, Nokia was in free-fall. They had no intention to change any of their tactics. They just planned to die with dumbphones. Then he comes along, signs up with Microsoft (because by this point Android is being dominated by companies like Samsung and HTC), and puts the company on a track to recovery. He's very similar to Obama in many ways.
by Divair » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:29 am
Napkiraly wrote:And Nokia still lost in terms of its share of the smartphone market, not to mention stock price.
Napkiraly wrote:He managed a restructuring, one that we have yet to see how it turns out.
Napkiraly wrote:And he definitely isn't like Obama.
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:51 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Arglorand » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:51 am
Grenartia wrote:Arglorand wrote:Indeed. I find cinema to be one of the USSR's strong sides. And New Year's Eve just can't go without the Irony of Fate, so even on the extremely low off-chance that they won't show it when said holiday rolls around I'll be able to watch it.
They used to be brilliant, actually.
The one I linked in this post, for example, I strongly recommend watching if you can find a subbed version. Preferably during the winter holidays.
Huh. One would think the censorship would've hindered them...
There were some good American TV shows as well, back in the day. M*A*S*H, Emergency! (which actually caused the rest of the nation to create paramedic programs), Bewitched, etc. I'd recommend watching any one of them if you can (especially the first two).
by Divair » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:00 am
by Des-Bal » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:01 am
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:05 am
Des-Bal wrote:I think I may be in the midst of a cold war over the thermostat.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:09 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Des-Bal » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:10 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Room temperature is serious business.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement