Dangelia wrote:Celritannia wrote:
I don't agree with the idea of 'Divine Right'. I believe in a meritocratic monarchy. It may seem 2 different ends of the scale, but the Roman Empire technically had a Meritocratic Monarchy, Augustus was the adopted son of Julius Caesar, appointed by the Roman Senate. Same thing happened to the adopted son of Augustus.
I am just not committed to the whole principle of 'first born should succeed.'
I agree it shouldn't be first born. I feel that instead, the monarch chooses the best among his children to rule after his death. It also limits the possibility of having an idiot as monarch. But even if there is an idiot, the senate vote can appoint a regent in his place.
Exactly. Or at least the Monarch and an appointed Privy Council decide, looking over specific qualities of each individual.
If we are to take divine right in to the prospect, many gods did not like the British Monarch's fist born. Edward the VIII abdicated in 1936. Henry Frederick died in 1612, leaving Charles to succeed the 3 Kingdoms. And of course the Black Prince fell to the black Death. The First born does not seem to be liked











