Advertisement

by Chelta » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:37 pm
Vuzghulia wrote:An uncivilized nation ... institutions do not meet civilized standards ... barely fit to be called a nation ... the people's beer smells like hobo-urine, their sports are silly and feminine ... your music is ridiculed ... nobody takes your politicians seriously ... it would be a public service if someone invaded and taught your people civilized ways.
Breheim wrote:Chelta is a den of deviants.

by The IASM » Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:51 am

by Senate President pro Tempore » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:04 am

by The Nihilistic view » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:25 am

by Battlion » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:28 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Voting lasts another 33 hours right?

by The Nihilistic view » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:30 am
6. 48 hours must elapse before a bill is passed or rejected. This excludes cases when, after 24 hours, 90% of votes or more are in favor or opposed to a bill. In order for the voting period to end early, five Senators must move to end the voting period early, with administrator approval.
-If an omnibus category has 7+ bills in it, it receives a minimum of 72 hours of debate time,

by Battlion » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:42 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Battlion wrote:
Voting lasts until 18:05 GMT on the 3rd November, however this should have been in the lobby and not the chamber.
We've not even had 24 hours yet...
*PpT*
What? voting is always 48 hours long!!!!
EDIT: Clause 6 of the second senate constitution6. 48 hours must elapse before a bill is passed or rejected. This excludes cases when, after 24 hours, 90% of votes or more are in favor or opposed to a bill. In order for the voting period to end early, five Senators must move to end the voting period early, with administrator approval.
EDIT 2: you confusing it with this from the First Amendment that only applies to the debate time-If an omnibus category has 7+ bills in it, it receives a minimum of 72 hours of debate time,


by Sahrani DR » Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:44 am

by Tsuken » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:05 am

by East Ormania » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:20 am

by Commonwealth of Great Britain » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:43 am

by Tundland » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:43 am

by Glasgia » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:48 am

by Agritum » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:54 am

by Angleter » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:58 am
by Osea 767 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:59 am

by Bering » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:20 am

by Lamaredia » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:48 am

by Fulflood » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:04 am
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal

by Corenea » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:35 am

by Battlion » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:05 am
Court Transparency Act
Urgency: Moderate | Author: Battlion [NDP] | Category: Order
Co-sponsors: Tundland [NDP], NEO Rome Republic [NDP], Beta Test [ALM], Britanno [ALM], Glasgia [MSP], Agritum [NDP], Lamaredia [NDP], Bering [NDP]
Preamble
An Act of the Senate of Aurentina to bring transparency to court proceedings and create a bigger connection to justice with everyday citizens whilst understanding and desiring to protect those who should remain privately involved in court proceedings.
Section I – Right to Deny
1. All Parties involved in a court case shall have the right to appeal to the Judge to restrict the recording of the case throughout its entirety or partly at the beginning of the court session.
2. The Judge may approve the appeal on the following grounds:(a) National Security could be threatened by the recording of the case
3. The Right to Deny shall not be included for the delivery of verdict and/or any sentencing that is to follow.
(b) There is no significant public interest in the recording of the case
4. The Judge shall explain his reasoning for the approval or rejection of an appeal before starting the trial, which shall be made public following the end of the court session.
Section II – Recording of Court Cases
1. Upon the passage of this act it shall be sufficient and legal for the approved recording of a court case, this shall apply to all courts within Aurentina.
2. “Approved Recording” shall be defined as the action or process of recording sound or a performance for subsequent reproduction or broadcast as approved by a Judge.
3. Any Recording that has not been approved by a Judge shall be subsequently destroyed, with those responsible facing the possibility of removal from the court or further charges as deemed sufficient by a Judge.
4. Only the arguments of lawyers and the comments of Judges may be recorded, no victim, defendant, witness or anyone directly related to them through blood or other means shall be recorded.
Section III – Broadcast of Court Cases
1. All recorded Court cases, entirely or partly, shall be placed online in an archive to be created by the Ministry of Justice.
2. Recorded Court cases, entirely or partly, shall be available for transmission across television networks following a successful bid to the Ministry of Justice.
3. The Ministry of Justice may approve or deny permission for any reason, however must provide a full public statement for doing so within twenty four hours.
Section IV – Review of Transparency
1. The Ministry of Justice shall review and produce a public statement on the amount of recorded cases available in the archive and on the amount of recorded cases that have been broadcast every year.

by Senate President pro Tempore » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:06 am

by Lemurian Islands » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:23 am

by Battlion » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:26 am
Lemurian Islands wrote:I vote aye for:
The Workplace Recovery Act, the Co-Determination Act, the Currency Reference Interim Clarification Act, and the
Parental Leave Act and the Child Benefit Allowance Programme Act.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement