Advertisement

by Ordenburg » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:02 pm

by Grenartia » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:03 pm
Belligerent Alcoholics wrote:Astrolinium wrote:Thank you for actually managing to say what I've been trying and failing to say. Blegh, I've been having all kinds of trouble getting my ideas formed into coherent thoughts lately.
I have that problem all the time.
But, yeah, I can get behind Grenartia's plan. It increases precision of language in an area that's been foggy for a while without bringing the PC Police into it.
The Truth and Light wrote:Astrolinium wrote:
Does it mean nothing to you? We are arguing for accurate terminology. You're arguing that we simply go around and change what words mean.
No, you're arguing for conventional terms, not accurate terms. I'm arguing for accurate terms. You seem a tad confused. I think you should look up the definition of "accurate".

by Coffee Cakes » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:05 pm
Seitonjin wrote:Coffee Cakes wrote:
Quite honestly, it's the reason I'm not involved with any of them.
George Takei though, despite being Buddhist, has done a good job on his FB page to be mindful that there are a number of Christans/churches that are supportive.
One of my favorite lines I've ever read was an inbox from another NSer back in the day, who's fairly involved in his church and a devout Christian. He told me the reason he still embraces faith is: "God wouldn't create a person to hate them for a trait He built them with. God sees people in need of love, and as a loving deity, it wouldn't be in His nature to condemn a portion of humanity to Hell for a trait which cannot be helped, and He wants to love His children and be loved back, whatever their orientation."
I dunno why, but that quote has really stuck with me over the last 2 years.
Also, oddly, between online and offline, my gay/bi friends are on the whole more proportionately Christian than the straights are. It's like 75% of my gay/bi friends are Christian compared to about 55% of my straight friends.
Someone should scrap the whole church system and replace it with the more Christian, Liberationist Theology. It's what Jesus most likely intended for.
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.

by Astrolinium » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:05 pm
Grenartia wrote:Belligerent Alcoholics wrote:I have that problem all the time.
But, yeah, I can get behind Grenartia's plan. It increases precision of language in an area that's been foggy for a while without bringing the PC Police into it.
I don't know why, but things like that seem to come naturally to me. Like I was born to solve problems or something.![]()

by The Truth and Light » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:05 pm
Grenartia wrote:You seem more than a tad confused yourself. Male and female more accurately refer to SEX, not gender. Masculine and feminine more accurately refer to GENDER, not sex.

by Lordieth » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:06 pm
Luveria wrote:Lordieth wrote:
Not it's not. I certainly wasn't defending his choice of words. Just his entitlement of opinion.
I don't see how that was an opinion when it extends into saying he needs to barf. And as I've explained, it's a psychological double standard since it's not the act of having a penis that is revolting, it's only when it's on a female, so clearly it's not the penis that is disgusting.

by Seitonjin » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:07 pm
Coffee Cakes wrote:Seitonjin wrote:Someone should scrap the whole church system and replace it with the more Christian, Liberationist Theology. It's what Jesus most likely intended for.
If I may be honest, I believe the church system as we know it needs the boot.
The individual denominations need to be on the receiving end of a heave-ho.
Churches should be buildings where people can come together to fellowship and learn, but they should be interchangeable in an ideal situation.
Unfortunately, peaceful denominationalism is the best we have, and it sure beats the hell outta wars between the churches.

by Ordenburg » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:08 pm
Seitonjin wrote:-bleh-

by Luveria » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:08 pm
Grenartia wrote:Gallup wrote:Also, the creepiest torture scene ever. Room 101 haunts my nightmares
Even more than the one from A Clockwork Orange?Luveria wrote:What I find to be an entirely hypocritical standard is I don't see males getting called disgusting for having a penis. Yet when a female has a penis, it's suddenly barf-inducing. How the fuck does that work. It doesn't add up.
I'd argue its sexist.
Lordieth wrote:Luveria wrote:I don't see how that was an opinion when it extends into saying he needs to barf. And as I've explained, it's a psychological double standard since it's not the act of having a penis that is revolting, it's only when it's on a female, so clearly it's not the penis that is disgusting.
Please do not misunderstand what it is I'm trying to say. What he said; totally unacceptable. What he thinks; up to him. No way was I condoning it.

by Lordieth » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:11 pm
Luveria wrote:
That makes sense.Lordieth wrote:
Please do not misunderstand what it is I'm trying to say. What he said; totally unacceptable. What he thinks; up to him. No way was I condoning it.
I'm not disagreeing with you. What I'm saying is he could have expressed his opinion in a way that wouldn't be blatant discrimination.

by Luveria » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:12 pm

by Belligerent Alcoholics » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:12 pm
Coffee Cakes wrote:Quite honestly, it's the reason I'm not involved with any of them.
George Takei though, despite being Buddhist, has done a good job on his FB page to be mindful that there are a number of Christans/churches that are supportive.
Coffee Cakes wrote:One of my favorite lines I've ever read was an inbox from another NSer back in the day, who's fairly involved in his church and a devout Christian. He told me the reason he still embraces faith is: "God wouldn't create a person to hate them for a trait He built them with. God sees people in need of love, and as a loving deity, it wouldn't be in His nature to condemn a portion of humanity to Hell for a trait which cannot be helped, and He wants to love His children and be loved back, whatever their orientation."
I dunno why, but that quote has really stuck with me over the last 2 years.
Coffee Cakes wrote:Also, oddly, between online and offline, my gay/bi friends are on the whole more proportionately Christian than the straights are. It's like 75% of my gay/bi friends are Christian compared to about 55% of my straight friends.
Grenartia wrote:Belligerent Alcoholics wrote:I have that problem all the time.
But, yeah, I can get behind Grenartia's plan. It increases precision of language in an area that's been foggy for a while without bringing the PC Police into it.
I don't know why, but things like that seem to come naturally to me. Like I was born to solve problems or something.![]()
Coffee Cakes wrote:If I may be honest, I believe the church system as we know it needs the boot.
The individual denominations need to be on the receiving end of a heave-ho.
Churches should be buildings where people can come together to fellowship and learn, but they should be interchangeable in an ideal situation.
Unfortunately, peaceful denominationalism is the best we have, and it sure beats the hell outta wars between the churches.
Seitonjin wrote:Don't forget the cheats and liars of the televangelists and overbearing, fire 'n brimstone preachers. They need a boot to the head.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Behave your damn selves, folks.

by Grenartia » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:14 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:Grenartia wrote:You seem more than a tad confused yourself. Male and female more accurately refer to SEX, not gender. Masculine and feminine more accurately refer to GENDER, not sex.
1. I KNOW that.
2. I'm trans. I know that, you know.
3. What I was arguing for was a change in terms for something better.
Again, fuck this I'm out. I don't feel safe in this space, or at least in this discussion.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement