The Red-Greens Headquarters [NSG Senate]

[The Licentian Isles]

Could any one tell me what the proper procedure for questioning the impartiality of a presiding officer is? I don't think that Nihl is being fair in only listing the speeches of four people that are for this confirmation in the OP of the voting thread.

I think you have to motion for it, and then have four/five people second the motion.

[Pesda]

Could any one tell me what the proper procedure for questioning the impartiality of a presiding officer is? I don't think that Nihl is being fair in only listing the speeches of four people that are for this confirmation in the OP of the voting thread.

I think you have to motion for it, and then have four/five people second the motion.

Where should I motion it, and will you guys support the motion?

[The Nihilistic view]

Could any one tell me what the proper procedure for questioning the impartiality of a presiding officer is? I don't think that Nihl is being fair in only listing the speeches of four people that are for this confirmation in the OP of the voting thread.

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

[The Licentian Isles]

I think you have to motion for it, and then have four/five people second the motion.

Where should I motion it, and will you guys support the motion?

Not sure, to be honest. Best asking one of the admins where the best place for it would be.

I would support it, yes.

[The Licentian Isles]

Could any one tell me what the proper procedure for questioning the impartiality of a presiding officer is? I don't think that Nihl is being fair in only listing the speeches of four people that are for this confirmation in the OP of the voting thread.

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

Well, maybe you could consider that the outgoing Vice President (*points at himself*) would be a suitable candidate for making a speech too, especially since it may balance out the views in that speech area a little bit.

[Ainin]

Where should I motion it, and will you guys support the motion?

Not sure, to be honest. Best asking one of the admins where the best place for it would be.

I would support it, yes.

PM thread is the place.

[The Nihilistic view]

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

Well, maybe you could consider that the outgoing Vice President (*points at himself*) would be a suitable candidate for making a speech too, especially since it may balance out the views in that speech area a little bit.

You can make one with your vote as stated in the OP of course. Although since the VP does not have any role in the appointing of the PM I would not consider it important enough to be listed. The same of course goes for Beta, the deputy PM and the candidate for deputy.

As I have said, it has nothing to do with views it is to do with the positions they hold. This is the same as in any other parliament when dealing with state matters such as the opening of parliament, speeches by heads of state and other matters such as budget day.

[Pesda]

Could any one tell me what the proper procedure for questioning the impartiality of a presiding officer is? I don't think that Nihl is being fair in only listing the speeches of four people that are for this confirmation in the OP of the voting thread.

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

[Maklohi Vai]

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

If you saw my speech, I abstained, but you do have a point that I did not speak against the PM candidate per se. It would be appropriate for Nihil to let someone of that mindset do so.

[HumanSanity]

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

PPUBA applies in the voting thread according to Nihil's own OP. Post and you shall receive seconds.

[The Nihilistic view]

So listing the two most important people from the last government and the incoming one is not impartial when they are from the two opposite coalitions is not impartial?

I did not have to let Ainin and MV make a prominent speech (I don't have to let any of you make a speech with your vote) since they are neither the candidate or the pesident proposing the candidate. I thought it would be a nice idea.

What they chose to write is up to them I just wanted to make sure both the old and new government had a chance to represent themselves as they were from different coalitions. If Ainin and MV don't agree with your view then that's not my fault. It's between you and them but I am sorry you feel that way.

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

when I decided this last week I did not know what they would do. If they have subsequently taken a position you don't agree with, that is something you need to take up with them not myself.

[Pesda]

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

If you saw my speech, I abstained, but you do have a point that I did not speak against the PM candidate per se. It would be appropriate for Nihil to let someone of that mindset do so.

I know you abstained, but it's true that he gave people who are for more attention.

[Pesda]

All four people going to say nice things about the proposed PM. You gave people who support "aye" a platform that you didn't give people who support "nay". This isn't impartial.

when I decided this last week I did not know what they would do. If they have subsequently taken a position you don't agree with, that is something you need to take up with them not myself.

I think you missed the point.

[Pesda]

Okay, I sent the whip Tg to everyone. I will again be watching how you all vote, so be very afraid
I expect a high turnout this time- it's important that we make our voices heard and that the new President loses this vote. I will see any rebels and I will ask them for an explanation.
Thank you, and happy voting.

[HumanSanity]

Okay, I sent the whip Tg to everyone. I will again be watching how you all vote, so be very afraid
I expect a high turnout this time- it's important that we make our voices heard and that the new President loses this vote. I will see any rebels and I will ask them for an explanation.
Thank you, and happy voting.

Thank you Pesda.

We've already come out, keep it up guys!

[Ceni]

Voted!

[Pesda]

Voted!

Thanks.

[Quebec and Atlantic Canada]

Voted a strong NAY to the PM confirmation.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

*ho[es he's allowed to pst on the thread but isnt sure because he's had a decent amount of qhiskey tonight*

Voted a strong NAY to the PM confirmation.

The Iron Party stands for fascism, dictatorship, totalitarianism, and the abolishment of all the rights and freedoms Aurentinians hold dear. Allowing Distruzio to take charge of the government will result in a new era of terror and tragedy not yet seen by our citizens! All Senators who stand for democracy, who stand for freedom in our country, I URGE you to vote NAY on the abhorrent nomination of Distruzio to the Premiership, lest you want a repeat of the German 1930s!

You do realise Distruzio isn't in the Iron Paty, correct? He's a CMP member. We've already got the ministries we want, you aren't affecting us at all by not voting for him.

[Distruzio]

Voted a strong NAY to the PM confirmation.

With respect, Senator, I'm curious to know why you think a vote for me would lead to a rise in nazism?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

[With respect, Senator, I'm curious to know why you think a vote for me would lead to a rise in nazism?

See above.

I think he somehw got the impression you're in the Iron Party.

[Pesda]

Voted a strong NAY to the PM confirmation.

Thank you.

[Pesda]

I vote NAY on this Prime Minister due to his coalition's continued support for the fascists.

I change my vote to ABSTAIN, since Distruzio represents one of the more moderate Senator choices for Prime Minister.

Oh dear.

[Unicario]

I change my vote to ABSTAIN, since Distruzio represents one of the more moderate Senator choices for Prime Minister.

Oh dear.

Unless I'm mistaken, party policy is that whips are one-line. It was never specified what kind of whip it was. If the Chairman has an issue with my abstaining, he may inform me personally.

Frankly, I'd much rather have a libertarian monarchist as my Prime Minister, than a fascist. With Distruzio, perhaps we can cooperate better than if we got a godforsaken Fascist.

Signed,
Alexandra von Hohenzollern
Vice Chair

[New federation janistan]

i voted