NATION

PASSWORD

The National Liberal Party HQ [NSG Senate]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Tue Aug 13, 2013 1:44 am

Battlion wrote:I shall now also begin writing my proposals, going to start with Universal Credit Prepaid Benefits card.

If someone, Nihil?, would like to begin drafting the Citizens Dividend proposal on the points already discussed?


I'll work on the YAC


Ah found it, got to go to work in a bit but will start collecting the point's from the thread when I get back later.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 1:51 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Battlion wrote:I shall now also begin writing my proposals, going to start with Universal Credit Prepaid Benefits card.

If someone, Nihil?, would like to begin drafting the Citizens Dividend proposal on the points already discussed?


I'll work on the YAC


Ah found it, got to go to work in a bit but will start collecting the point's from the thread when I get back later.


Brilliant :)

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:23 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Battlion wrote:
The idea really is we prevent children from having to live with names that are honestly awful but not banning names like some countries.

It's more of a common sense thing really, merely the official refuses to sign any birth certificate with a name that is offensive, derogatory to the child and infringes on the right to live without fear of violence. It won't affect many cases but it's just something I think needs to be there alongside a time limit for giving name for children, you don't want children going around being called "child #1" or "boy/girl" because parents aren't obliged to.

It's minor legislation, just something I think we should do


Names such as North West spring to mind.


I can just see how someone is going to tease her and call her mothers vagina ''The North West passage''
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:46 am

Here is what I have currently written, any suggestions on ways to expand this or improve it?

Name Control and Registration Act
Urgency: Minor | Author: Battlion [NLP] | Category: Miscellaneous
Co-sponsors:


Preamble
Noting the lack of clarity and legislation regarding the naming of children and it’s specific timings. The Senate has hereby decided to act in accordance to its powers to ensure that a process is followed across Aurentina for all children to be named and registered with a local authority within a set time from birth and to ensure that names given to children are not offensive and/or will not reduce the child’s standard of life to an unacceptable level.

Section I – Birth Registration
1: The Senate hereby creates the National Birth Register (“NBR”) to record all births within the borders of Aurentina from the passing of this Act
2: Every Child must be registered upon the National Birth Register within forty days of birth through a form provided by every Hospital upon the birth of the child.
3: Information shall be required from both parents upon this form as follows:
    a) Name and Surname
    b) Place of Birth
    c) Occupation
    d) Usual Address (if different from the child’s place of birth)
4: Information shall be required by the parents for the child as follows:
    a) Date and Place of Birth
    b) Name and Surname
    c) Sex
5: All Registrations shall be required to be approved by an Officer of the Local Authority where the Birth Registration has been filed.
6: The Officer administering the Birth Registration has the ability to refuse to register any child’s name that may be deemed as offensive, derogatory to the child, inflammatory and/or threatens the right of the child to live in freedom of violence or fear
7: It shall be hereby noted that the definition of offensive in reference to the Name Control and Registration Act as resentful, upsetting or discriminatory.
8: The definition of offensive shall not cover names that are deemed religious nor will religious belief be available as a ground for refusing to administer a Birth Registration form.
9: Birth Registration Forms shall also be available from the Local Authority at the request of a parent in the event of registration forms not being distributed in a hospital or from a home birth.

Section II – Children Name Protection
1: The Senate shall be forbidden from passing any law that excludes recognised names as a legal name
2: The Government shall be forbidden from passing any Ministerial Directive that excludes recognised names as a legal name
3: The Judicial System shall be forbidden from passing any judgement that excludes recognised names as a legal name except in the instance of protection of the child in significant circumstances.
Last edited by Battlion on Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:20 am

EDIT: Nevermind, it was already in there. I just missed it.
Last edited by Lamaredia on Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:16 am

Changed some of the wording in section II, is there anything I've missed that we may want to put in?

Name Control and Registration Act
Urgency: Minor | Author: Battlion [NLP] | Category: Miscellaneous
Co-sponsors: National Empire [NLP], Europe and the Americas [NLP], Gothmogs [TR], Falmerheim [NLP], Britanno [P-CP], The Nihilistic view [NLP], Seitonjin [NLP], Great Britain and America [NLP]


Preamble
Noting the lack of clarity and legislation regarding the naming of children and it’s specific timings. The Senate has hereby decided to act in accordance to its powers to ensure that a process is followed across Aurentina for all children to be named and registered with a local authority within a set time from birth and to ensure that names given to children are not offensive and/or will not reduce the child’s standard of life to an unacceptable level.

Section I – Birth Registration
1: The Senate hereby creates the National Birth Register (“NBR”) to record all births within the borders of Aurentina from the passing of this Act
2: Every Child must be registered upon the National Birth Register within forty days of birth through a form provided by every Hospital upon the birth of the child.
3: Information shall be required from both parents upon this form as follows:
    a) Name and Surname
    b) Place of Birth
    c) Occupation
    d) Usual Address (if different from the child’s place of birth)
4: Information shall be required by the parents for the child as follows:
    a) Date and Place of Birth
    b) Name and Surname
    c) Sex
5: All Registrations shall be required to be approved by an Officer of the Local Authority where the Birth Registration has been filed.
6: The Officer administering the Birth Registration has the ability to refuse to register any child’s name that may be deemed as offensive, derogatory to the child, inflammatory and/or threatens the right of the child to live in freedom of violence or fear
7: It shall be hereby noted that the definition of offensive in reference to the Name Control and Registration Act as resentful, upsetting or discriminatory.
8: The definition of offensive shall not cover names that are deemed religious nor will religious belief be available as a ground for refusing to administer a Birth Registration form.
9: Birth Registration Forms shall also be available from the Local Authority at the request of a parent in the event of registration forms not being distributed in a hospital or from a home birth.

Section II – Children Name Protection
1: The Senate shall pass no law that outlaws specific names being granted to children
2: The Government shall pass no Ministerial Directive, Declaration or any form of guidance that outlaws specific names being granted to children.
3: The Judicial System shall issue a ruling that outlaws specific names being granted to children.
Last edited by Battlion on Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:12 pm, edited 9 times in total.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:17 am

Not that I can think of right now.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:18 am

Lamaredia wrote:Not that I can think of right now.


What about the wording?

Want to make sure the law is watertight

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:20 am

Lamaredia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Names such as North West spring to mind.


I can just see how someone is going to tease her and call her mothers vagina ''The North West passage''


:rofl:
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:20 am

Battlion wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:Not that I can think of right now.


What about the wording?

Want to make sure the law is watertight


I can't find any errors, although I'm in a bit of a hurry at the moment so I might have missed something.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:22 am

Battlion wrote:Changed some of the wording in section II, is there anything I've missed that we may want to put in?

Name Control and Registration Act
Urgency: Minor | Author: Battlion [NLP] | Category: Miscellaneous
Co-sponsors:


Preamble
Noting the lack of clarity and legislation regarding the naming of children and it’s specific timings. The Senate has hereby decided to act in accordance to its powers to ensure that a process is followed across Aurentina for all children to be named and registered with a local authority within a set time from birth and to ensure that names given to children are not offensive and/or will not reduce the child’s standard of life to an unacceptable level.

Section I – Birth Registration
1: The Senate hereby creates the National Birth Register (“NBR”) to record all births within the borders of Aurentina from the passing of this Act
2: Every Child must be registered upon the National Birth Register within forty days of birth through a form provided by every Hospital upon the birth of the child.
3: Information shall be required from both parents upon this form as follows:
    a) Name and Surname
    b) Place of Birth
    c) Occupation
    d) Usual Address (if different from the child’s place of birth)
4: Information shall be required by the parents for the child as follows:
    a) Date and Place of Birth
    b) Name and Surname
    c) Sex
5: All Registrations shall be required to be approved by an Officer of the Local Authority where the Birth Registration has been filed.
6: The Officer administering the Birth Registration has the ability to refuse to register any child’s name that may be deemed as offensive, derogatory to the child, inflammatory and/or threatens the right of the child to live in freedom of violence or fear
7: It shall be hereby noted that the definition of offensive in reference to the Name Control and Registration Act as resentful, upsetting or discriminatory.
8: The definition of offensive shall not cover names that are deemed religious nor will religious belief be available as a ground for refusing to administer a Birth Registration form.
9: Birth Registration Forms shall also be available from the Local Authority at the request of a parent in the event of registration forms not being distributed in a hospital or from a home birth.

Section II – Children Name Protection
1: The Senate shall pass no law that outlaws specific names being granted to children
2: The Government shall pass no Ministerial Directive, Declaration or any form of guidance that outlaws specific names being granted to children.
3: The Judicial System shall issue a ruling that outlaws specific names being granted to children.


Nihil, see anything I've missed?

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:28 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:
I can just see how someone is going to tease her and call her mothers vagina ''The North West passage''


:rofl:


I mean, they're just asking for it with that name!
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:29 am

Battlion wrote:
Battlion wrote:Changed some of the wording in section II, is there anything I've missed that we may want to put in?

Name Control and Registration Act
Urgency: Minor | Author: Battlion [NLP] | Category: Miscellaneous
Co-sponsors:


Preamble
Noting the lack of clarity and legislation regarding the naming of children and it’s specific timings. The Senate has hereby decided to act in accordance to its powers to ensure that a process is followed across Aurentina for all children to be named and registered with a local authority within a set time from birth and to ensure that names given to children are not offensive and/or will not reduce the child’s standard of life to an unacceptable level.

Section I – Birth Registration
1: The Senate hereby creates the National Birth Register (“NBR”) to record all births within the borders of Aurentina from the passing of this Act
2: Every Child must be registered upon the National Birth Register within forty days of birth through a form provided by every Hospital upon the birth of the child.
3: Information shall be required from both parents upon this form as follows:
    a) Name and Surname
    b) Place of Birth
    c) Occupation
    d) Usual Address (if different from the child’s place of birth)
4: Information shall be required by the parents for the child as follows:
    a) Date and Place of Birth
    b) Name and Surname
    c) Sex
5: All Registrations shall be required to be approved by an Officer of the Local Authority where the Birth Registration has been filed.
6: The Officer administering the Birth Registration has the ability to refuse to register any child’s name that may be deemed as offensive, derogatory to the child, inflammatory and/or threatens the right of the child to live in freedom of violence or fear
7: It shall be hereby noted that the definition of offensive in reference to the Name Control and Registration Act as resentful, upsetting or discriminatory.
8: The definition of offensive shall not cover names that are deemed religious nor will religious belief be available as a ground for refusing to administer a Birth Registration form.
9: Birth Registration Forms shall also be available from the Local Authority at the request of a parent in the event of registration forms not being distributed in a hospital or from a home birth.

Section II – Children Name Protection
1: The Senate shall pass no law that outlaws specific names being granted to children
2: The Government shall pass no Ministerial Directive, Declaration or any form of guidance that outlaws specific names being granted to children.
3: The Judicial System shall issue a ruling that outlaws specific names being granted to children.


Nihil, see anything I've missed?


End of my lunch at work now, I did give it a quick glance and there was nothing glaring. I will have a look for loopholes later though. I tend to find most of the one's found in the senate bill's. :)
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:09 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Battlion wrote:
Nihil, see anything I've missed?


End of my lunch at work now, I did give it a quick glance and there was nothing glaring. I will have a look for loopholes later though. I tend to find most of the one's found in the senate bill's. :)


Well that is good, just want to get this one sorted before I pump out the Universal Credit prepaid cards and then the Young Aurentine Card Bill which I'm trying to think of a name for.

User avatar
Falmerheim
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Falmerheim » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:14 am

I like that bill very much Battlion, it's got my support.

That case was dreadful
Senator Joseph Lemirio representing the National Liberal Party

User avatar
Europe and the Americas
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Europe and the Americas » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:18 am

I agree, that bill is a good idea however I will scan it and see if I see any problems.
Senator for The National Liberal Party

Proud to be Loud! THE CALL

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:23 am

Brilliant, I'll start having another look whilst we're at it

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:45 am

I have just posted an amendment in the Coffee shop to ensure that President/Prime Minister Questions are available at all times and not every two weeks, I'd be grateful if members would sponsor it in the coffee shop.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:39 am

Universal Credit (Aurentine Benefit Card & General Amendment) Act
Urgency: High | Author: Battlion [NLP] | Category: Domestic Development
Co-sponsors: Lamaredia [NLP], Gothmogs [TR], Europe and the Americas [NLP], Falmerheim [NLP], Britanno [P-CP], The Nihilistic view [NLP], Seitonjin [NLP], Great Britain and America [NLP], Chris Thorburn [NLP]


Preamble
Noting the large amounts of taxpayers money being spent on Welfare through the Ministry of Work and wanting to ensure that Universal Credit can be delivered easily and with far less bureaucracy, whilst stressing continued support for the Universal Credit, by the introduction of a new method of payments and a new distribution of payments altering the payment schedule from annually to monthly but ensuring that a yearly allowance is granted. Additionally, this Senate recognises that there is currently no limit on how Universal Credit payments which derive from the taxpayers is spent with no way of regulation brings forward a new method of monitoring spending and promoting fiscal independence hereby enacts the following act.


Section I – Amendments to the Universal Credit Act
1. Section 2 part G of the Universal Credit Act shall be repealed and replaced with the following text:
    "Universal Credit Payment shall be paid into a Aurentine Benefit Card, which each claimant shall be provided with within fourteen days of Universal Credit Application-F being processed"
2. Section 2 part J shall be added into the Universal Credit Act and shall contain the following text:
    "Universal Credit payments shall be paid on the first of each month, ensuring a yearly allowance split into monthly payments"

Section II - Aurentine Benefit Cards
1. The Senate hereby establishes the method of payment for Universal Credit shall be the Aurentine Benefit Card
2. The Aurentine Benefit Card shall be a Card similar to a debit card however shall not be linked to any bank account, Universal Credit Payments shall be paid directly to the card monthly.
3. Aurentine Benefit Cards shall only contain the scheduled monthly payment and shall not go into debt once all the Universal Credit Payment has been spent
4. All Claimants will be able to add their own money to their Aurentine Benefit Card through pay points with their own unique PIN number given to them when the Aurentine Benefit Card is distributed
5. Any Claimant that has Universal Credit Payment still on their Aurentine Benefit Card before the next instalment shall have all money returned to the government and shall have an additional 15% of what was taken added onto their next Universal Credit Payment.
5. Claimants of the Aurentine Benefit Card will be able to cap daily or weekly spending on their Aurentine Benefit Card at their own leisure
6. The Ministry of Work shall be tasked with the creation of the Aurentine Benefit Cards whilst the Living Wage Commission shall be tasked with the distribution of Aurentine Benefit Cards

Section III - Restrictions on Aurentine Universal Credit Payment Spending
1. All Aurentine Benefit Cards shall have spending monitored by the Living Wage Commission
2. Aurentine Benefit Cards shall be blocked for use in the following places:
    a) Casinos
    b) Poker Rooms, Bingo Halls, Dog Racing Tracks and other forms of gaming business
    c) Adult Entertainment Clubs, Massage Parlours, businesses that exclusively sell alcohol (night clubs, bars, saloons, pubs
    or taverns), tattoo or piercing parlours
    d) cruise ships, firearms and ammunition dealers, psychic readers and spas
3. Aurentine Benefit Cards shall be blocked for use when purchasing the following products:
    a) Tobacco and Alcohol
    b) All drugs under classes A,B,C and X as set out by the Sale of Harmful Substances Act (2013)
4. The Living Wage Commission shall have the authority to block all payments to an Individual Aurentine Benefit Card if used in any of the aforementioned establishments or to purchase any of the aforementioned products.
5. The Living Wage Commission shall only unblock payments to an Individual Aurentine Benefit Card after the claimant has personally requested it to be continued and sufficient evidence has been shown that Universal Credit Payments shall not be used on any of the aforementioned products or services
6. The Living Wage Commission shall have the power to issue fines against any claimant that has their Aurentine Benefit Card blocked at their own discretion from 25% to 150% of the payment made to the Claimant for the month where the Aurentine Benefit Card was blocked


What do people think?
Last edited by Battlion on Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:01 am, edited 11 times in total.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:21 am

It's good, and I'll sponsor it.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:27 am

Lamaredia wrote:It's good, and I'll sponsor it.


Brilliant, any flaws in it?

I was thinking of having the monthly leftover if any being given back to the government but 10% of whatever is returned being added to the next payment.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:33 am

Battlion wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:It's good, and I'll sponsor it.


Brilliant, any flaws in it?

I was thinking of having the monthly leftover if any being given back to the government but 10% of whatever is returned being added to the next payment.


Not any glaring ones (although being as tired as I am I might just be missing them)
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:34 am

Lamaredia wrote:
Battlion wrote:
Brilliant, any flaws in it?

I was thinking of having the monthly leftover if any being given back to the government but 10% of whatever is returned being added to the next payment.


Not any glaring ones (although being as tired as I am I might just be missing them)


What do you think of the leftover?

It would reward under spending and budgeting and give incentive to do so by getting an additional payment next month.

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:45 am

Battlion wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:
Not any glaring ones (although being as tired as I am I might just be missing them)


What do you think of the leftover?

It would reward under spending and budgeting and give incentive to do so by getting an additional payment next month.


i cant think right now sorry. im so tired but i cant go to bed before im done with my work
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Battlion
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Battlion » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:46 am

Lamaredia wrote:
Battlion wrote:
What do you think of the leftover?

It would reward under spending and budgeting and give incentive to do so by getting an additional payment next month.


i cant think right now sorry. im so tired but i cant go to bed before im done with my work


That is fine, I might input it anyway.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads