*recuse
Definition of recuse: Excuse oneself from a case because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality.
The conflict of interest is that I'm the admin who originally accepted him.
Yes, you should have.
Advertisement
by Maklohi Vai » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:57 pm
Definition of recuse: Excuse oneself from a case because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality.
by Bodobol » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:58 pm
by Great Nepal » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:59 pm
by The Republic of Llamas » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:59 pm
by Ikania » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:59 pm
Great Nepal wrote:I am going to change my vote to allow him, MV knew about the DEAT and accepted him. That decision should stand although with note that no one with DEAT should be accepted in future.
by Fulflood » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:00 pm
Great Nepal wrote:I am going to change my vote to allow him, MV knew about the DEAT and accepted him. That decision should stand although with note that no one with DEAT should be accepted in future.
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal
by Bodobol » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:00 pm
Great Nepal wrote:I am going to change my vote to allow him, MV knew about the DEAT and accepted him. That decision should stand although with note that no one with DEAT should be accepted in future.
by Maklohi Vai » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:00 pm
by Battlion » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:01 pm
by Jetan » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:01 pm
Valentir wrote:It is clear we have to do a lot of reforms after this election. So many damn loopholes........
by Ainin » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:02 pm
Great Nepal wrote:I am going to change my vote to allow him, MV knew about the DEAT and accepted him. That decision should stand although with note that no one with DEAT should be accepted in future.
by Great Nepal » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:02 pm
Battlion wrote:I think the admins need to clarify their rules, over the last few things so many things have been brought into question.
So I ask nicely that the admins convene and actually AGREE on rules instead of waiting for problems to happen and then lead to things like this.
by The Republic of Llamas » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:03 pm
Valentir wrote:It is clear we have to do a lot of reforms after this election. So many damn loopholes........
by Ikania » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:03 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Battlion wrote:I think the admins need to clarify their rules, over the last few things so many things have been brought into question.
So I ask nicely that the admins convene and actually AGREE on rules instead of waiting for problems to happen and then lead to things like this.
It is not needed, these kind of incidents happen rarely and when they do we manage to agree on it.
by Valentir » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:03 pm
The Republic of Llamas wrote:Valentir wrote:It is clear we have to do a lot of reforms after this election. So many damn loopholes........
Join me in writing reform bills, my friend! After the way I revitalized my new region of Nesapo, let's see if I can do it with Aurentina...
OOC: I choose a new name for my senator; Henry Clay. 'Cause I like that guy a lot, all with the compromises that almost prevented 700,000 deaths, plus there's the American System.
by Great Nepal » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:03 pm
Ainin wrote:Great Nepal wrote:I am going to change my vote to allow him, MV knew about the DEAT and accepted him. That decision should stand although with note that no one with DEAT should be accepted in future.
But the DEAT was the result of a single instance of moderator action, which was a 24hr ban for spamming TET, and then unknowingly posting with a puppet.
Some people here have some awful records, but have never been DEATed, and making a fuss over this one is just plain unfair.
by Great Nepal » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:04 pm
by Ikania » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:05 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Ainin wrote:But the DEAT was the result of a single instance of moderator action, which was a 24hr ban for spamming TET, and then unknowingly posting with a puppet.
Some people here have some awful records, but have never been DEATed, and making a fuss over this one is just plain unfair.
For me, DEAT is equivalent to being sentenced to life in prison but being released on parole. That one record overshadows everything else, except hanging (DoS).
by Bodobol » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:05 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Ainin wrote:But the DEAT was the result of a single instance of moderator action, which was a 24hr ban for spamming TET, and then unknowingly posting with a puppet.
Some people here have some awful records, but have never been DEATed, and making a fuss over this one is just plain unfair.
For me, DEAT is equivalent to being sentenced to life in prison but being released on parole. That one record overshadows everything else, except hanging (DoS).
by Ikania » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:08 pm
by Ainin » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:08 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Ainin wrote:But the DEAT was the result of a single instance of moderator action, which was a 24hr ban for spamming TET, and then unknowingly posting with a puppet.
Some people here have some awful records, but have never been DEATed, and making a fuss over this one is just plain unfair.
For me, DEAT is equivalent to being sentenced to life in prison but being released on parole. That one record overshadows everything else, except hanging (DoS).
by The Republic of Llamas » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:08 pm
Valentir wrote:The Republic of Llamas wrote:Join me in writing reform bills, my friend! After the way I revitalized my new region of Nesapo, let's see if I can do it with Aurentina...
OOC: I choose a new name for my senator; Henry Clay. 'Cause I like that guy a lot, all with the compromises that almost prevented 700,000 deaths, plus there's the American System.
Never written a bill before. I guess I can help.
by Maklohi Vai » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:08 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement