NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Coffee Shop: 50% off Americanos [NSG Senate]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:50 pm

New Zepuha wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:Could go a bit further and perhaps legislate give-way rules, usage of roundabouts etc.

This is a basic outline, so I would appreciate if you could write those out as the US is fairly new to roundabouts and our give way laws are only unwritten common courtesy things. I will add them in.


I edited my post for give-way (yield) rules. In Britain, Australia and New Zealand, vehicles signal when they leave roundabouts.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Finium
Senator
 
Posts: 3849
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Finium » Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:19 pm

Costa Alegria wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:This is a basic outline, so I would appreciate if you could write those out as the US is fairly new to roundabouts and our give way laws are only unwritten common courtesy things. I will add them in.


I edited my post for give-way (yield) rules. In Britain, Australia and New Zealand, vehicles signal when they leave roundabouts.

I wouldn't be at all opposed to the outlawing of roundabouts. I've driven one for hours and got absolutely nowhere, they're obviously very useless.
big chungus, small among us

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:21 pm

Finium wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
I edited my post for give-way (yield) rules. In Britain, Australia and New Zealand, vehicles signal when they leave roundabouts.

I wouldn't be at all opposed to the outlawing of roundabouts. I've driven one for hours and got absolutely nowhere, they're obviously very useless.


They're fine if designed and used correctly.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Waldmania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 546
Founded: Apr 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waldmania » Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:55 pm

What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.

Correctional Officer's Responsibility Code (CORC)
Author:
Joshua Waldman (NCP) Urgency: Moderate-High SIMBEDS Category: Order Sponsors: Ainin (TR), Belmaria (LCP), Potenco (RG)


DEFINES A "prisoner" as a person detained while under investigation, awaiting trial or being punished for a crime; and a "correctional officer" as a person who cares for, guards, or transports prisoners.

RECOGNIZING That many of the rights of prisoners is covered in the Bill of Rights of the Aurentine Constitution

ALARMED That there are still many loopholes that may allow for the mistreatment of prisoners

HEREBY Establishes the responsibilities of a correctional officer

SECTION 1: PUNISHMENT 1. A correctional officer shall not use physical, mental or sexual abuse as punishment for the misbehavior of a criminal.
1a. A prisoner is under the care of and is the responsibility of the correctional officer and any sexual intercourse or sexual acts, regardless of consent, between a correctional officer and a prisoner will be regarded as statutory rape and the correctional officer will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
1b. In cases where the prisoner can be proven to have raped the correctional officer, the officer will be exempt from the above clause.
2. A correctional officer will not physically assault a prisoner, except in cases of self-defence where the correctional officer feels he/she is threatened.
2a. A weapon is defined as any object used to cause physical harm, excluding firearms and body parts.
2b. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer without a weapon, a correctional officer may defend themselves but may not use a weapon or a firearm to defend themselves unless they feel their life is threatened.
2c. A correctional officer may not use closed handed strikes on a prisoner, only open-handed strikes.
2d. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a weapon, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a weapon that is authorized to be used on the prisoner including, but not limited to: baton, OC spray(pepper spray), tazor. A correctional officer may not use any other object as a weapon. A correctional officer may not use a firearm in response unless the correctional officer feels like their life is threatened.
2e. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a firearm, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a firearm.
2f. All correctional officers must be provided with proper training and equipment to respond to any situation that involves physical confrontation with a prisoner.
3. No correctional officer may deny a prisoner the right to the following: food, clean water, sleep, healthcare, the ability to get rid of human waste, a sanitary environment and communication with family members outside of the prison unless a waiver is given by the warden

SECTION 2: TRANSPORTATION 1. During the transportation of a prisoner, the transportation officers are considered responsible for the safety and care of the prisoners and must follow the above laws.
2. A transportation officer must, to the best of their ability, deliver the prisoner to their destination as fast as possible without breaking any laws.
3. All transportation vehicles must meet the following requirements:
- Have Access to clean air
- Have safety belts for every prisoner
- Have the necessary equipment to ensure the secure containment of the prisoner(s) during transportation
- Have no less than two officers in the vehicle at the same time while there are prisoners inside the transportation vehicle
- Be clean and sanitary for use

SECTION 3: SOLITARY CONFINEMENT 1. No prisoner shall be subjected to solitary confinement as defined below
1a. Solitary Confinement is defined as the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting and/or utilities.
2. Any correctional officers found subjugating any prisoner to solitary confinement will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

SECTION 4: ADHERENCE TO CORC 1. Every prison must ensure that every correctional officer is informed of and follows the responsibilities set by CORC.
2. Failure to adhere to CORC will result in the correctional officer being immediately sacked, as well as tried for any crimes they had commited in the process.
Last edited by Waldmania on Sun Aug 25, 2013 3:07 pm, edited 8 times in total.
economic left/right= 0.12
social libertarian/authoritarian=-2.16
My Factbook

User avatar
Central and Eastern Visayas
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5214
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Central and Eastern Visayas » Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:41 pm

Waldmania wrote:What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.

Correctional Officer's Responsibility Code (CORC)
Author:
Joshua Waldman Urgency: Moderate-High SIMBEDS Category: Order Sponsors:


DEFINES A "prisoner" as a person detained while under investigation, awaiting trial or being punished for a crime; and a "correctional officer" as a person who cares for, guards, or transports prisoners.

RECOGNIZING That many of the rights of prisoners is covered in the Bill of Rights of the Aurentine Constitution

ALARMED That there are still many loopholes that may allow for the mistreatment of prisoners

HEREBY Establishes the responsibilities of a correctional officer

SECTION 1: PUNISHMENT 1. A correctional officer shall not use physical, mental or sexual abuse as punishment for the misbehavior of a criminal.
1a. A prisoner is under the care of and is the responsibility of the correctional officer and any sexual intercourse or sexual acts, regardless of consent, with another prisoner will be regarded as statutory rape and the correctional officer will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
1b. In cases where the prisoner can be proven to have raped the correctional officer, then the officer will be exempt from the above clause.
2. A correctional officer will not physically assault a prisoner, except in cases of self-defence where the correctional officer feels he/she is threatened.
2a. A weapon is defined as any object used to cause physical harm, excluding firearms.
2b. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer without a weapon, a correctional officer may defend themselves but may not use a weapon or a firearm to defend themselves unless they feel their life is threatened.
2c. A correctional officer may not use closed handed strikes on a prisoner, only open-handed strikes.
2d. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a weapon, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a weapon that is authorized to be used on the prisoner including, but not limited to: baton, OC spray(pepper spray), tazor. A correctional officer may not use any other object as a weapon. A correctional officer may not use a firearm in response unless the correctional officer feels like their life is threatened.
2e. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a firearm, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a firearm.
2f. All correctional officers must be provided with proper training and equipment to respond to any situation that involves physical confrontation with a prisoner.
3. No correctional officer may deny a prisoner the right to the following: food, clean water, sleep, healthcare, the ability to get rid of human waste, a sanitary environment and communication with family members outside of the prison unless a waiver is given by the warden

SECTION 2: TRANSPORTATION 1. During the transportation of a prisoner, the transportation officers are considered responsible for the safety and care of the prisoners and must follow the above laws.
2. A transportation officer must, to the best of their ability, deliver the prisoner to their destination as fast as possible without breaking any laws.
3. All transportation vehicles must meet the following requirements:
- Have Access to clean air
- Have safety belts for every prisoner
- Have the necessary equipment to ensure the secure containment of the prisoner(s) during transportation
- Have no less than two officers in the vehicle at the same time while there are prisoners inside the transportation vehicle
- Be clean and sanitary for use

SECTION 3: SOLITARY CONFINEMENT 1. No prisoner shall be subjected to solitary confinement as defined below
1a. Solitary Confinement is defined as the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities.
2. Any correctional officers found subjugating any prisoner to solitary confinement will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

SECTION 4: ADHERENCE TO CORC 1. Every prison must ensure that every correctional officer is informed of and follows the responsibilities set by CORC.
2. Failure to adhere to CORC will result in the correctional officer being immediately sacked, as well as tried for any crimes they had commited in the process.

Remove Section 3. Solitary confinement has its uses.
If believing in God means I am less than human in the eyes of some, fine; I will wear my yellow badge with pride.

TIMEZONE: GMT +8
1. In a gunless society, the strong prey on the weak with utter impunity.
2. Yes, I'm a Roman Catholic from the Philippines. And I know how much ass PH sucks at the moment.
3. Bastard with ADHD. Yep.
4. PDAF can go to hell!
Economic Left/Right: 6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.49
Or: This.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:30 am

Waldmania wrote:What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.

Correctional Officer's Responsibility Code (CORC)
Author:
Joshua Waldman Urgency: Moderate-High SIMBEDS Category: Order Sponsors:


DEFINES A "prisoner" as a person detained while under investigation, awaiting trial or being punished for a crime; and a "correctional officer" as a person who cares for, guards, or transports prisoners.

RECOGNIZING That many of the rights of prisoners is covered in the Bill of Rights of the Aurentine Constitution

ALARMED That there are still many loopholes that may allow for the mistreatment of prisoners

HEREBY Establishes the responsibilities of a correctional officer

SECTION 1: PUNISHMENT 1. A correctional officer shall not use physical, mental or sexual abuse as punishment for the misbehavior of a criminal.
1a. A prisoner is under the care of and is the responsibility of the correctional officer and any sexual intercourse or sexual acts, regardless of consent, with another prisoner will be regarded as statutory rape and the correctional officer will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
1b. In cases where the prisoner can be proven to have raped the correctional officer, then the officer will be exempt from the above clause.
2. A correctional officer will not physically assault a prisoner, except in cases of self-defence where the correctional officer feels he/she is threatened.
2a. A weapon is defined as any object used to cause physical harm, excluding firearms.
2b. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer without a weapon, a correctional officer may defend themselves but may not use a weapon or a firearm to defend themselves unless they feel their life is threatened.
2c. A correctional officer may not use closed handed strikes on a prisoner, only open-handed strikes.
2d. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a weapon, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a weapon that is authorized to be used on the prisoner including, but not limited to: baton, OC spray(pepper spray), tazor. A correctional officer may not use any other object as a weapon. A correctional officer may not use a firearm in response unless the correctional officer feels like their life is threatened.
2e. If a prisoner assaults a correctional officer with a firearm, the correctional officer may defend themselves with a firearm.
2f. All correctional officers must be provided with proper training and equipment to respond to any situation that involves physical confrontation with a prisoner.
3. No correctional officer may deny a prisoner the right to the following: food, clean water, sleep, healthcare, the ability to get rid of human waste, a sanitary environment and communication with family members outside of the prison unless a waiver is given by the warden

SECTION 2: TRANSPORTATION 1. During the transportation of a prisoner, the transportation officers are considered responsible for the safety and care of the prisoners and must follow the above laws.
2. A transportation officer must, to the best of their ability, deliver the prisoner to their destination as fast as possible without breaking any laws.
3. All transportation vehicles must meet the following requirements:
- Have Access to clean air
- Have safety belts for every prisoner
- Have the necessary equipment to ensure the secure containment of the prisoner(s) during transportation
- Have no less than two officers in the vehicle at the same time while there are prisoners inside the transportation vehicle
- Be clean and sanitary for use

SECTION 3: SOLITARY CONFINEMENT 1. No prisoner shall be subjected to solitary confinement as defined below
1a. Solitary Confinement is defined as the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities.
2. Any correctional officers found subjugating any prisoner to solitary confinement will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

SECTION 4: ADHERENCE TO CORC 1. Every prison must ensure that every correctional officer is informed of and follows the responsibilities set by CORC.
2. Failure to adhere to CORC will result in the correctional officer being immediately sacked, as well as tried for any crimes they had commited in the process.

I'll sponsor.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Fulflood
Diplomat
 
Posts: 645
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fulflood » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:29 am

Finium wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
I edited my post for give-way (yield) rules. In Britain, Australia and New Zealand, vehicles signal when they leave roundabouts.

I wouldn't be at all opposed to the outlawing of roundabouts. I've driven one for hours and got absolutely nowhere, they're obviously very useless.

They are far better than any other similarly-expensive intersection (e.g. traffic-light, 4-way stop) in terms of traffic flow, and are extremely useful in built-up areas with little room for larger junctions, or on the intersection of two priority routes.

Also, you've driven round one for hours? This reminds me of a time a while back when I saw a group of cows in a field, including one male one, and the male one excreted.
Last edited by Fulflood on Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
I go under the name Vyvland now (IIWiki page). This account is used for the odd foray into the Senate or NSG.
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal

Admin, New Democrat member for Lüborg (504) and ambassador to the Red-Greens in the Aurentine Senate. Minister of Business Safety of Aurentina. Apparently that deserves a ministry, but I'm not complaining. I'm probably none of these things anymore. | The Aurentine Phrasebook, my magnum opus.

User avatar
Waldmania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 546
Founded: Apr 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waldmania » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:34 am

Central and Eastern Visayas wrote:
Waldmania wrote:What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.


Remove Section 3. Solitary confinement has its uses.

Maybe change it to only allow solitary confinement in certain situations? I don't think officers should have the ability to just place prisoners in solitary confinement unless they have a good reason.
economic left/right= 0.12
social libertarian/authoritarian=-2.16
My Factbook

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:51 am

Waldmania wrote:
Central and Eastern Visayas wrote:Remove Section 3. Solitary confinement has its uses.

Maybe change it to only allow solitary confinement in certain situations? I don't think officers should have the ability to just place prisoners in solitary confinement unless they have a good reason.

Yeah seems acceptable.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:01 am

Central and Eastern Visayas wrote:
Waldmania wrote:What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.


Remove Section 3. Solitary confinement has its uses.

"The extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities" has no uses.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:15 am

Ainin wrote:
Central and Eastern Visayas wrote:Remove Section 3. Solitary confinement has its uses.

"The extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities" has no uses.

And how the hell are you gonna pressure him to giving you details?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:16 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ainin wrote:"The extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities" has no uses.

And how the hell are you gonna pressure him to giving you details?

You don't.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Mishmahig
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9032
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mishmahig » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:18 am

Ainin wrote:
CTALNH wrote:And how the hell are you gonna pressure him to giving you details?

You don't.


Mmhmm.

Although what if a prisoner is considered a threat to himself/herself or others? Or if s/he's considered a disruptive influence on the prison population? I don't like the idea of solitary confinement, but....there needs to be an alternative.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:18 am

Ainin wrote:
CTALNH wrote:And how the hell are you gonna pressure him to giving you details?

You don't.

How the heck are you gonna catch criminals if you can't make one man snitch his buddies?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:20 am

Mishmahig wrote:
Ainin wrote:You don't.


Mmhmm.

Although what if a prisoner is considered a threat to himself/herself or others? Or if s/he's considered a disruptive influence on the prison population? I don't like the idea of solitary confinement, but....there needs to be an alternative.

The bill defines solitary confinement as "the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities".

If there is an adequate amount of lighting and utilities, it's not solitary confinement anymore.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:20 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ainin wrote:You don't.

How the heck are you gonna catch criminals if you can't make one man snitch his buddies?

You can. You just can't treat him like crap while doing it.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Mishmahig
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9032
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mishmahig » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:24 am

Ainin wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
Mmhmm.

Although what if a prisoner is considered a threat to himself/herself or others? Or if s/he's considered a disruptive influence on the prison population? I don't like the idea of solitary confinement, but....there needs to be an alternative.

The bill defines solitary confinement as "the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities".

If there is an adequate amount of lighting and utilities, it's not solitary confinement anymore.


I'm terribly sorry, I misread the bill.

Mea culpa, etc.

Yeah, that's not right. Solitary confinement is ~eh~ enough in my opinion, but without access to basic utilities and whatnot? That seems just....cruel.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:24 am

Ainin wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the heck are you gonna catch criminals if you can't make one man snitch his buddies?

You can. You just can't treat him like crap while doing it.
:palm: Like what tell me!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:33 pm

Finium wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
I edited my post for give-way (yield) rules. In Britain, Australia and New Zealand, vehicles signal when they leave roundabouts.

I wouldn't be at all opposed to the outlawing of roundabouts. I've driven one for hours and got absolutely nowhere, they're obviously very useless.

Roundabouts are used because they allow traffic to flow more smoothly as compared to traffic lights and are safer. http://www.iihs.org/research/qanda/roundabouts.aspx
Studies of intersections in the United States converted from traffic signals or stop signs to roundabouts have found reductions in injury crashes of 72-80 percent and reductions in all crashes of 35-47 percent. 1 2 3 A study of 19 higher-speed rural intersections (speed limits of 40 mph or higher) that originally had stop signs on the minor approaches and were converted to roundabouts found a 62 percent reduction in all crashes and a 85 percent reduction in injury crashes. 4 Studies of intersections in Europe and Australia that were converted to roundabouts have reported 25-87 percent reductions in injury crashes and 36-61 percent reductions in all crashes.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:35 pm

Mishmahig wrote:
Ainin wrote:The bill defines solitary confinement as "the extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities".

If there is an adequate amount of lighting and utilities, it's not solitary confinement anymore.


I'm terribly sorry, I misread the bill.

Mea culpa, etc.

Yeah, that's not right. Solitary confinement is ~eh~ enough in my opinion, but without access to basic utilities and whatnot? That seems just....cruel.

This^. Imprisoning someone without enough lighting and utilities is simply torture.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:36 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Ainin wrote:"The extended isolation of a prisoner without access to adequate lighting or utilities" has no uses.

And how the hell are you gonna pressure him to giving you details?

Not through cruel punishment.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Waldmania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 546
Founded: Apr 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waldmania » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:00 pm

Since everyone feels strongly about no solitary confinement, I will keep that clause in.
economic left/right= 0.12
social libertarian/authoritarian=-2.16
My Factbook

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:12 pm

Ainin wrote:
Waldmania wrote:What are your thoughts? This is my first bill, so I expect a lot of criticism and mistakes.


I'll sponsor.

I'll sponsor as well
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:12 pm

Air Quality Warning and Awareness Agency Establishment Act (AQWAA)
Drafted by: Gothmogs
Sponsors: Venaleria, Seitonjin, Belmaria, Britanno
SIMBEDS Category: Environment

Understanding that citizens have the right to know how healthy the environment they are living in is whenever they want, and that bad air quality can kill, harm, and cause discomfort to individuals. This agency will help inform the public how harmful the air is each day.

Section 1 - Purpose
1. Each local AQWAA will be in charge of measuring the air quality in the city they are located in, and posting the results on their website, and the local weather channel.
2. The AQWAA will also be tasked with helping to raise awareness about air quality and air pollution, and creating projects to try and help lower air pollution rates.

Section 2 - Establishment
1. Each city in Aurentina must establish an AQWAA somewhere in the city limits.
2. Each AQWAA must be stocked with surgical masks that any citizen can use for free upon request.
3. The government must establish a national AQWAA, to set requirements and regulations on all local AQWAAs.
4. Each member of AQWAA must meet the minimum requirements set by the National AQWAA Board.
5. Each city must provide the necessary equipment for their local AQWAA.

Section 3 - National AQWAA Board (NAQWAAB)
1. The National AQWAA Board will consist of eleven individuals agreed upon by the Minister of the Environment and the Minister of Health, whose job is to set requirements on the joining of AQWAA, regulate AQWAA, and vote on the implementation of national projects carried out by AQWAA.
2. The board has no power over the national government.

Section 4 - Duties of AQWAA
1. All local AQWAAs are required to test the air quality of the city they are located in each day, and post the most accurate results on their website and the local weather channel every day.
2. All AQWAAs are required to give free surgical masks to any citizen that requests one.
3. AQWAAs are required to help raise awareness on air quality and pollution, and to try to implement projects that help lower air pollution rates.

Recommended Air Quality Measurement Scale:
Green - All groups may participate in normal activities
Good Air Quality
0 - 50 AQI

Yellow - Unusually sensitive people may experience health effects and may consider limiting activity
Moderate Air Quality
51 - 100 AQI

Orange - Children, active individuals, elderly adults and those with heart or lung conditions should limit activity or exertion
Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
101 - 150 AQI

Red - Individuals in sensitive groups should avoid activity or exertion; all other should limit activity or exertion
Unhealthy
151 - 200 AQI

Purple - All individuals should avoid activity or exertion
Very Unhealthy
201 - 300 AQI

Burgundy - Health effects are forecast regardless of exertion level; emergency actions are required
Hazardous
301 - 500 AQI

Hereby Passes the AQWAA Act

Any last sponsors or critiques before I submit this?
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
Mitonesia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 437
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mitonesia » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:46 pm

I sponsor, it's a very good iniciative. May I suggest that the agency is called the AQWA Agency, it sounds a lot better than AQWAA and resembles the italian word aqua, althought it means water :p
Senator Alexandre Ruisseau Mitonesia (Weilënze, Constituency 169)
Member of the New Democrats


I'm portuguese and male.
My nation and my senator are a good mirror of my political/social beliefs (There might be things I don't agree with anymore). For general topics regarding my view on politics and such head there.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads