Advertisement

by Great Nepal » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:53 pm

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:53 pm

by Yanalia » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:54 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Why would AQ be primary (or even a large) supplier of hard drugs if it is legal? Surely, someone would pick it up that producing those drugs within the nation is much cheaper than importing them from middle east, thus ensuring they can get higher revenue.
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:55 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Why would AQ be primary (or even a large) supplier of hard drugs if it is legal? Surely, someone would pick it up that producing those drugs within the nation is much cheaper than importing them from middle east, thus ensuring they can get higher revenue.

by The Nihilistic view » Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:57 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Why would AQ be primary (or even a large) supplier of hard drugs if it is legal? Surely, someone would pick it up that producing those drugs within the nation is much cheaper than importing them from middle east, thus ensuring they can get higher revenue.

by The Red Star Empire » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:00 pm

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:02 pm
The Red Star Empire wrote:Hello! Says Jack Davis, appearing out of the blue.
"I'm running for the Senate as a communist. Any other Commes here? Anyway, I'd like a Latte"

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:04 pm
The Red Star Empire wrote:Hello! Says Jack Davis, appearing out of the blue.
"I'm running for the Senate as a communist. Any other Commes here? Anyway, I'd like a Latte"

by The Red Star Empire » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:06 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:The Red Star Empire wrote:Hello! Says Jack Davis, appearing out of the blue.
"I'm running for the Senate as a communist. Any other Commes here? Anyway, I'd like a Latte"
"The USLP and the CP caters to those tastes. I personally and more of a fan of USLP as they have a better sense of humor."

by Great Nepal » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:06 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Why would AQ be primary (or even a large) supplier of hard drugs if it is legal? Surely, someone would pick it up that producing those drugs within the nation is much cheaper than importing them from middle east, thus ensuring they can get higher revenue.
There is a limited amount of places that can produce raw opium on this earth.
Byzantium Imperial wrote:In any case, I am not supporting a policy which encourages new buisnesses to prop up with the sole intent of exploiting peoples addictions. All producers of Heroin are immoral anyway, regardless of legality
by Ainin » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:08 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Why would AQ be primary (or even a large) supplier of hard drugs if it is legal? Surely, someone would pick it up that producing those drugs within the nation is much cheaper than importing them from middle east, thus ensuring they can get higher revenue.
There is a limited amount of places that can produce raw opium on this earth. In any case, I am not supporting a policy which encourages new buisnesses to prop up with the sole intent of exploiting peoples addictions. All producers of Heroin are immoral anyway, regardless of legality

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:08 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:09 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:There is a limited amount of places that can produce raw opium on this earth.
Seeing the market for those drugs, I am quite sure someone will invest to ensure it can be produced locally.Byzantium Imperial wrote:In any case, I am not supporting a policy which encourages new buisnesses to prop up with the sole intent of exploiting peoples addictions. All producers of Heroin are immoral anyway, regardless of legality
And why should we decide legality based on your morality, fucking the free will of individuals?

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:10 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:There is a limited amount of places that can produce raw opium on this earth.
Seeing the market for those drugs, I am quite sure someone will invest to ensure it can be produced locally.Byzantium Imperial wrote:In any case, I am not supporting a policy which encourages new buisnesses to prop up with the sole intent of exploiting peoples addictions. All producers of Heroin are immoral anyway, regardless of legality
And why should we decide legality based on your morality, fucking the free will of individuals?

by Great Nepal » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:11 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Seeing the market for those drugs, I am quite sure someone will invest to ensure it can be produced locally.
And why should we decide legality based on your morality, fucking the free will of individuals?
"Please senator, quieten down. I don't want anyone else getting ideas"

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:11 pm
Ainin wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:There is a limited amount of places that can produce raw opium on this earth. In any case, I am not supporting a policy which encourages new buisnesses to prop up with the sole intent of exploiting peoples addictions. All producers of Heroin are immoral anyway, regardless of legality
Morality is, wait for it,
Hang on...
Almost there....
Subjective!

by Yanalia » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:11 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Seeing the market for those drugs, I am quite sure someone will invest to ensure it can be produced locally.
And why should we decide legality based on your morality, fucking the free will of individuals?
If you dont think the entire idea behind producing hard drugs is immoral then either A. You dont get the poitn of breaking bad or B. No morals.
And in any case, the free will of the individuals in this case can go fuck themselves because: I the taxpayer am paying for their healthcare, I the government member am looking out for whats good for them, and I the westerner dont like Al Queda.
Its a very small minority who are addicted to heroin. They dont have to be addicted to that, there is marijuana and rehab, and I dont see a single good reason to allow it in the first place.
Getting High is not a human right.
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.


by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:13 pm
Yanalia wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:If you dont think the entire idea behind producing hard drugs is immoral then either A. You dont get the poitn of breaking bad or B. No morals.
And in any case, the free will of the individuals in this case can go fuck themselves because: I the taxpayer am paying for their healthcare, I the government member am looking out for whats good for them, and I the westerner dont like Al Queda.
Its a very small minority who are addicted to heroin. They dont have to be addicted to that, there is marijuana and rehab, and I dont see a single good reason to allow it in the first place.
Getting High is not a human right.
Bodily sovereignty, however, is.

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Yanalia wrote:Byzantium Imperial wrote:If you dont think the entire idea behind producing hard drugs is immoral then either A. You dont get the poitn of breaking bad or B. No morals.
And in any case, the free will of the individuals in this case can go fuck themselves because: I the taxpayer am paying for their healthcare, I the government member am looking out for whats good for them, and I the westerner dont like Al Queda.
Its a very small minority who are addicted to heroin. They dont have to be addicted to that, there is marijuana and rehab, and I dont see a single good reason to allow it in the first place.
Getting High is not a human right.
Bodily sovereignty, however, is.

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:14 pm

by Great Nepal » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:15 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:If you dont think the entire idea behind producing hard drugs is immoral then either A. You dont get the poitn of breaking bad or B. No morals.
Byzantium Imperial wrote:And in any case, the free will of the individuals in this case can go fuck themselves because: I the taxpayer am paying for their healthcare,
Byzantium Imperial wrote:I the government member am looking out for whats good for them,
Byzantium Imperial wrote:and I the westerner dont like Al Queda.
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Its a very small minority who are addicted to heroin. They dont have to be addicted to that, there is marijuana and rehab, and I dont see a single good reason to allow it in the first place.

by Byzantium Imperial » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:16 pm

by Yanalia » Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:21 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:if anyone needs me, im going to excersie my right to bodily sovereignty right now. I assuming the cow that iwll die is irrelevant...
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement