Oh. Where is the most recent version of the bill?
Advertisement

by United Great Britian » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:29 pm

by Battlion » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:37 pm

by United Great Britian » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:38 pm
Battlion wrote:United Great Britian wrote:Oh. Where is the most recent version of the bill?
I submitted it to the chamber
viewtopic.php?p=19522233#p19522233
The big issue people have, and I fully agree it's harsh, is that the PpT and SoS are required by the law to abstain on all legislation bar that in the senatorial procedures. Now I would be very happy to amend this, and some do claim this is unconstitutional however the constitution only says that Senators must be given the ability to vote. The Impartiality lock still gives them the ability to vote how they like when there is a tie, when it's a senatorial procedures category and damn all the time however they are required to abstain.
If anybody can suggest an impartiality lock that guarantees full impartiality then I shall welcome any amendment.
However, I might petition the admins/Supreme Court on whether they think the proposal would be legal (but again, not sure if it's in their remit)

by The Nihilistic view » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:41 pm
Battlion wrote:United Great Britian wrote:Oh. Where is the most recent version of the bill?
I submitted it to the chamber
viewtopic.php?p=19522233#p19522233
The big issue people have, and I fully agree it's harsh, is that the PpT and SoS are required by the law to abstain on all legislation bar that in the senatorial procedures. Now I would be very happy to amend this, and some do claim this is unconstitutional however the constitution only says that Senators must be given the ability to vote. The Impartiality lock still gives them the ability to vote how they like when there is a tie, when it's a senatorial procedures category and damn all the time however they are required to abstain.
If anybody can suggest an impartiality lock that guarantees full impartiality then I shall welcome any amendment.
However, I might petition the admins/Supreme Court on whether they think the proposal would be legal (but again, not sure if it's in their remit)
The vote the way Boris says act
Noting that some believe they can infringe on a senators right to vote on all legislation how they wish.
Believing that they are correct and that it is perfectly legal force senators to have to legally vote a certain way.
Hereby mandates that all senators must vote the way Lord Boris Johnson directs them or their vote will be illegal

by Battlion » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:45 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:54 pm

by Battlion » Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:57 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:It is a pretty simple principle, do all senators have the right to cast their vote how they chose or not. It does not matter whether one inch or one mile over this line we go, a right is a right and any infringement on it would be wrong.
OOC: There is also the OOC issue the whole point to this RP is to vote on a write bills, wish is why I believe that right is there in the first place. We should not be stopping people from doing the thing that this whole RP is based around.

by The Nihilistic view » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:18 pm
Battlion wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:It is a pretty simple principle, do all senators have the right to cast their vote how they chose or not. It does not matter whether one inch or one mile over this line we go, a right is a right and any infringement on it would be wrong.
OOC: There is also the OOC issue the whole point to this RP is to vote on a write bills, wish is why I believe that right is there in the first place. We should not be stopping people from doing the thing that this whole RP is based around.
I've admitted the infringement is regrettable, many times.
However, abstaining is voting, having a free vote on senatorial procedures is voting, having a free vote in the event of a tie is voting there is no blocking of vote.
There is international precedent for this to occur, if it works for others why won't it work for us?
OOC: People agree to be the PpT or SoS, if they agree to it knowing these restrictions are there then they should be allowed to do so. However, they are allowed to vote as I keep saying

by The New World Oceania » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:23 pm
Battlion wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:It is a pretty simple principle, do all senators have the right to cast their vote how they chose or not. It does not matter whether one inch or one mile over this line we go, a right is a right and any infringement on it would be wrong.
OOC: There is also the OOC issue the whole point to this RP is to vote on a write bills, wish is why I believe that right is there in the first place. We should not be stopping people from doing the thing that this whole RP is based around.
I've admitted the infringement is regrettable, many times.
However, abstaining is voting, having a free vote on senatorial procedures is voting, having a free vote in the event of a tie is voting there is no blocking of vote.

by Battlion » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:24 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Battlion wrote:
I've admitted the infringement is regrettable, many times.
However, abstaining is voting, having a free vote on senatorial procedures is voting, having a free vote in the event of a tie is voting there is no blocking of vote.
There is international precedent for this to occur, if it works for others why won't it work for us?
OOC: People agree to be the PpT or SoS, if they agree to it knowing these restrictions are there then they should be allowed to do so. However, they are allowed to vote as I keep saying
So support my bill, all senators can still "vote".
If you regret it then remove it. That's what people do when they regret something, they change it if they can or wish they could if they don't have the power to change it.
If you regret it, it's time to put your mouth where our balls are and remove it.


by The Nihilistic view » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:30 pm
Battlion wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
So support my bill, all senators can still "vote".
If you regret it then remove it. That's what people do when they regret something, they change it if they can or wish they could if they don't have the power to change it.
If you regret it, it's time to put your mouth where our balls are and remove it.
IC: And when you can guarantee me that no President Pro Tempore of this Senate will ever abuse their power again like you did by blocking a confirmation vote for your own presidential ambitions will I happily remove it.
OOC: I'll think about it, I'm going to ask the admins to review it OOCly and let them decide on it. If they recommend a change then I'll do that.
ily really nihil

by Glasgia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:40 am
Limitation of Bureaucracy Act
Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Low | Author: Prime Minister Robert Glasgia [MSP] | Sponsors: Great Nepal [NCP], Senator Jameson T. Pace [Ind.]
RECOGNISING: That the Ministry of Culture and Sports, alongside the Ministry of Customs, represents an unnecessary bureaucracy which could be far more efficiently handled by other departments within the government.
THEREFORE: Passes the Limitation of Bureaucracy Act to eliminate aforementioned unnecessary bureaucracy and create a more efficient government.
Article I.
Abolition of the Ministry of Culture and Sports
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Culture and Sports, striking the following line - "The Ministry of Culture and Sports, with the task of protecting the cultural heritage of the country, promoting cultural and sportive activities and expression, manage cultural and sports agencies and organizations." - from the Ministry Foundation Act and declaring that line to be null and void.
II. Transfers all powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports, that were involved in education related tasks, to the Ministry of Education and allows the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to allocate the appropriate funds for such a change
III. Therefore transcends all other powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to local governments, to be divided as the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports seems fit
IV. Recommends all employees displaced by such transfers for preference upon application for vacant positions in government, if they apply within their speciality
Article II.
Abolition of the Ministry of Customs
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Customs, declaring the executive order that established it to be null and void.
II. Establishes the Department of Customs and Immigration, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior
III. Transfers all powers, personnel and finances of the former Ministry of Customs to the Department of Customs and Immigration
STATING: That such transfers have already been established in practice through executive decree, but shall be immediately corrected if this bill is to be struck down.

by United Great Britian » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:43 am
Glasgia wrote:Limitation of Bureaucracy Act
Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Low | Author: Prime Minister Robert Glasgia [MSP] | Sponsors: None
RECOGNISING: That the Ministry of Culture and Sports, alongside the Ministry of Customs, represents an unnecessary bureaucracy which could be far more efficiently handled by other departments within the government.
THEREFORE: Passes the Limitation of Bureaucracy Act to eliminate aforementioned unnecessary bureaucracy and create a more efficient government.
Article I.
Abolition of the Ministry of Culture and Sports
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Culture and Sports, striking the following line - "The Ministry of Culture and Sports, with the task of protecting the cultural heritage of the country, promoting cultural and sportive activities and expression, manage cultural and sports agencies and organizations." - from the Ministry Foundation Act and declaring that line to be null and void.
II. Transfers all powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports, that were involved in education related tasks, to the Ministry of Education and allows the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to allocate the appropriate funds for such a change
III. Therefore transcends all other powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to local governments, to be divided as the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports seems fit
IV. Recommends all employees displaced by such transfers for preference upon application for vacant positions in government, if they apply within their speciality
Article II.
Abolition of the Ministry of Customs
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Customs, declaring the executive order that established it to be null and void.
II. Establishes the Department of Customs and Immigration, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior
III. Transfers all powers, personnel and finances of the former Ministry of Customs to the Department of Customs and Immigration
STATING: That such transfers have already been established in practice through executive decree, but shall be immediately corrected if this bill is to be struck down.

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:43 am
Glasgia wrote:Limitation of Bureaucracy Act
Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Low | Author: Prime Minister Robert Glasgia [MSP] | Sponsors: None
RECOGNISING: That the Ministry of Culture and Sports, alongside the Ministry of Customs, represents an unnecessary bureaucracy which could be far more efficiently handled by other departments within the government.
THEREFORE: Passes the Limitation of Bureaucracy Act to eliminate aforementioned unnecessary bureaucracy and create a more efficient government.
Article I.
Abolition of the Ministry of Culture and Sports
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Culture and Sports, striking the following line - "The Ministry of Culture and Sports, with the task of protecting the cultural heritage of the country, promoting cultural and sportive activities and expression, manage cultural and sports agencies and organizations." - from the Ministry Foundation Act and declaring that line to be null and void.
II. Transfers all powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports, that were involved in education related tasks, to the Ministry of Education and allows the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to allocate the appropriate funds for such a change
III. Therefore transcends all other powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to local governments, to be divided as the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports seems fit
IV. Recommends all employees displaced by such transfers for preference upon application for vacant positions in government, if they apply within their speciality
Article II.
Abolition of the Ministry of Customs
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Customs, declaring the executive order that established it to be null and void.
II. Establishes the Department of Customs and Immigration, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior
III. Transfers all powers, personnel and finances of the former Ministry of Customs to the Department of Customs and Immigration
STATING: That such transfers have already been established in practice through executive decree, but shall be immediately corrected if this bill is to be struck down.

by Glasgia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:47 am
Great Nepal wrote:Glasgia wrote:Limitation of Bureaucracy Act
Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Low | Author: Prime Minister Robert Glasgia [MSP] | Sponsors: None
RECOGNISING: That the Ministry of Culture and Sports, alongside the Ministry of Customs, represents an unnecessary bureaucracy which could be far more efficiently handled by other departments within the government.
THEREFORE: Passes the Limitation of Bureaucracy Act to eliminate aforementioned unnecessary bureaucracy and create a more efficient government.
Article I.
Abolition of the Ministry of Culture and Sports
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Culture and Sports, striking the following line - "The Ministry of Culture and Sports, with the task of protecting the cultural heritage of the country, promoting cultural and sportive activities and expression, manage cultural and sports agencies and organizations." - from the Ministry Foundation Act and declaring that line to be null and void.
II. Transfers all powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports, that were involved in education related tasks, to the Ministry of Education and allows the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to allocate the appropriate funds for such a change
III. Therefore transcends all other powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to local governments, to be divided as the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports seems fit
IV. Recommends all employees displaced by such transfers for preference upon application for vacant positions in government, if they apply within their speciality
Article II.
Abolition of the Ministry of Customs
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Customs, declaring the executive order that established it to be null and void.
II. Establishes the Department of Customs and Immigration, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior
III. Transfers all powers, personnel and finances of the former Ministry of Customs to the Department of Customs and Immigration
STATING: That such transfers have already been established in practice through executive decree, but shall be immediately corrected if this bill is to be struck down.
I sponsor, although I must say I would rather see the entire bill establishing ministries struck down. Ministries are delegation of tasks by the prime minister as such existence or non existence of certain ministries should be within discretion of the reining government...
) to defend such actions if they decide to.
by United Great Britian » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:48 am
Great Nepal wrote:Glasgia wrote:Limitation of Bureaucracy Act
Category: Miscellaneous | Urgency: Low | Author: Prime Minister Robert Glasgia [MSP] | Sponsors: None
RECOGNISING: That the Ministry of Culture and Sports, alongside the Ministry of Customs, represents an unnecessary bureaucracy which could be far more efficiently handled by other departments within the government.
THEREFORE: Passes the Limitation of Bureaucracy Act to eliminate aforementioned unnecessary bureaucracy and create a more efficient government.
Article I.
Abolition of the Ministry of Culture and Sports
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Culture and Sports, striking the following line - "The Ministry of Culture and Sports, with the task of protecting the cultural heritage of the country, promoting cultural and sportive activities and expression, manage cultural and sports agencies and organizations." - from the Ministry Foundation Act and declaring that line to be null and void.
II. Transfers all powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports, that were involved in education related tasks, to the Ministry of Education and allows the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to allocate the appropriate funds for such a change
III. Therefore transcends all other powers and personnel of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports to local governments, to be divided as the leadership of the former Ministry of Culture and Sports seems fit
IV. Recommends all employees displaced by such transfers for preference upon application for vacant positions in government, if they apply within their speciality
Article II.
Abolition of the Ministry of Customs
I. Hereby dissolves the Ministry of Customs, declaring the executive order that established it to be null and void.
II. Establishes the Department of Customs and Immigration, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior
III. Transfers all powers, personnel and finances of the former Ministry of Customs to the Department of Customs and Immigration
STATING: That such transfers have already been established in practice through executive decree, but shall be immediately corrected if this bill is to be struck down.
I sponsor, although I must say I would rather see the entire bill establishing ministries struck down. Ministries are delegation of tasks by the prime minister as such existence or non existence of certain ministries should be within discretion of the reining government...

by United Great Britian » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:55 am
Ministry Act of 2014
Author: United Great Britian (Independent) | Co-sponsors: | Category: Domestic Development | Urgency: High
RECOGNISING that ministries are delegations of power by the head of government.
BELIEVING that we can fix current legislation.
HEREBY strikes the "Ministry Foundation Act" null and void.
HEREBY mandates that the head of government may create or disband any ministry at their sole-discretion.
HEREBY mandates that any senator may move to disband a ministry that was created by the head of government. If that motion is seconded five times a vote will begin to disband that ministry.
HEREBY amends any place where the name of a ministry is stated to say in the place of that name, "a ministry decided by the head of government".

by The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:58 am

by Britanno » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:01 am

by United Great Britian » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:05 am
United Great Britian wrote:Ministry Act of 2014
Author: United Great Britian (Independent) | Co-sponsors: | Category: Domestic Development | Urgency: High
RECOGNISING that ministries are delegations of power by the head of government.
BELIEVING that we can fix current legislation.
HEREBY strikes the "Ministry Foundation Act" null and void.
HEREBY mandates that the head of government may create or disband any ministry at their sole-discretion as long as it is approved by vote of the senate. That vote will take 24 hours and requires 50% + 1 of the senators voting to vote in favor for the ministry to be created.
HEREBY amends any place where the name of a ministry is stated to say in the place of that name, "a ministry decided by the head of government".

by Glasgia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:06 am
Britanno wrote:On the whole PpT thing, surely not voting will still not guarantee impartiality? The PpT will still have an opinion so even if the PpT doesn't vote, ze can still be biased. I fail to see how your bill solves the problem Battlion.
I may or may not have named it that ironically, considering we've been recently attacked by the right for supposedly being overly bureaucratic.
by Battlion » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:07 am
Britanno wrote:On the whole PpT thing, surely not voting will still not guarantee impartiality? The PpT will still have an opinion so even if the PpT doesn't vote, ze can still be biased. I fail to see how your bill solves the problem Battlion.

by Britanno » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:08 am
Battlion wrote:I have no doubt many officer who are constrained by this have an opinion, let them have their opinion aye.

by The Nihilistic view » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:10 am
Britanno wrote:On the whole PpT thing, surely not voting will still not guarantee impartiality? The PpT will still have an opinion so even if the PpT doesn't vote, ze can still be biased. I fail to see how your bill solves the problem Battlion.

by Britanno » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:10 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement