Alliance for Aurentina [NSG Senate]

by **Byzantium Imperial** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:37 am

Battlion wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:The USLP is kinda unpredictable here really. Britanno is up to 56 now.

We need to get more of our vote out, it's going to be close but we can't afford to lose.

As long as there isnt a massive surge in Yanila support, I am confident that we are going to pull this one off. USLP hates both sides equally, of the independent canidates 2 of the 3 will definetly vote for us, and our chances in a second round are very good.

by **Macedonian Grand Empire** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:07 am

Where can we vote?

by **Battlion** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:10 am

Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Where can we vote?

In the Presidential election vote thread

by **CTALNH** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:11 am

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=252106&start=250

by **Macedonian Grand Empire** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:24 am

Voted for my former party leader britano.Lets go and win this

by **Quirina** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:25 am

I propose a new logo for AfA. Hope you like it. Thanks. Cheers fellas! :clap:

by **Wolfmanne** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:26 am

I think we should start a list of independents who wish to be part of the coalition.

by **Battlion** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:26 am

really like that!

Agreed, Independents shouldn't be excluded from supporting us

by **Britanno** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:29 am

Guys, instead of telegramming your inactive party members to vote, ask them to let you vote on their behalf. Let them proxy vote.

by **Quirina** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:33 am

Britanno wrote:Guys, instead of telegramming your inactive party members to vote, ask them to let you vote on their behalf. Let them proxy vote.

My party will surely follow the Chair's directives.

by **Regnum Dominae** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:54 am

I find it funny that the PC complains that we have the NIFP, while they are trying to make a deal with the Stalinists.

Quirina wrote:(Image)

I propose a new logo for AfA. Hope you like it. Thanks. Cheers fellas!

I like it!

by **The Realm of God** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:59 am

Regnum Dominae wrote:I find it funny that the PC complains that we have the NIFP, while they are trying to make a deal with the Stalinists.

Quirina wrote:(Image)

I propose a new logo for AfA. Hope you like it. Thanks. Cheers fellas!

I like it!

I read the USLP's platform, I'm now deeply, deeply concerned about possible concessions in the Progress Coalition's platform.

by **Regnum Dominae** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:01 am

The Realm of God wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:I find it funny that the PC complains that we have the NIFP, while they are trying to make a deal with the Stalinists.

I like it!

I read the USLP's platform, I'm now deeply, deeply concerned about possible concessions in the Progress Coalition's platform.

Seriously, they're accusing us for working with a party that has actually moderated quite a bit since the whole "we're not fascists! yes we are! no we're not! yes we are!" incident a while ago, while they are attempting to make concessions with a party whose whole platform is basically "liquidate the bourgeoisie and purge our political opponents".

by **Maklohi Vai** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:01 am

The Realm of God wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:I find it funny that the PC complains that we have the NIFP, while they are trying to make a deal with the Stalinists.

I like it!

I read the USLP's platform, I'm now deeply, deeply concerned about possible concessions in the Progress Coalition's platform.

If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

by **Britanno** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:01 am

Hmm… I don't see many CMP people voting for us despite them being members of the coalition now.

by **Regnum Dominae** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:02 am

Britanno wrote:Hmm… I don't see many CMP people voting for us despite them being members of the coalition now.

Many member of CMP doesn't vote, period. They think it's "lending legitimacy to an illegitimate institution" or something silly like that.

by **CTALNH** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:03 am

Maklohi Vai wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
I read the USLP's platform, I'm now deeply, deeply concerned about possible concessions in the Progress Coalition's platform.

If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

Indeed but we will freaking extort you for every position in the cabinet of yours... :twisted:

by **Wolfmanne** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:04 am

Britanno wrote:Hmm… I don't see many CMP people voting for us despite them being members of the coalition now.

It's the leadership of the party. They are all pretty much 'no' to everything. I've been in telegrams with the grassroots members, whom I shall not name and they've expressed disdain at this.

by **Maklohi Vai** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:04 am

CTALNH wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

Indeed but we will freaking extort you for every position in the cabinet of yours...

You truly don't see how that makes you look?

by **The Realm of God** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:05 am

Maklohi Vai wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
I read the USLP's platform, I'm now deeply, deeply concerned about possible concessions in the Progress Coalition's platform.

If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

You are in negotiations with them thus they are in a position to influence your platform.

by **Regnum Dominae** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:05 am

CTALNH wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

Indeed but we will freaking extort you for every position in the cabinet of yours...

^ See what I mean?

by **CTALNH** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:05 am

The Realm of God wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

You are in negotiations with them thus they are in a position to influence your platform.

Cabinet not platform.

by **The Realm of God** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:06 am

Britanno wrote:Hmm… I don't see many CMP people voting for us despite them being members of the coalition now.

I've got very good relations with some of the CMP and could definitely attempt to sway them

by **Quirina** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:06 am

CTALNH wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

Indeed but we will freaking extort you for every position in the cabinet of yours...

I sense that once any left-wing worm is sprayed away, they will just become blabbering mouths of insult and disgust outside the government. They were given a chance, but they messed it up good and badly.

by **Maklohi Vai** » Sat Jul 13, 2013 9:09 am

The Realm of God wrote:
Maklohi Vai wrote:If I may ask, what do you mean? The USLP will not influence the Progress Coalition platform.

You are in negotiations with them thus they are in a position to influence your platform.

No. Negotiations are about cabinet positions, not platform. The USLP will not be allowed to change the platform, nor do they harbor a desire to do so, as far as I know.

Quirina wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Indeed but we will freaking extort you for every position in the cabinet of yours...

I sense that once any left-wing worm is sprayed away, they will just become blabbering mouths of insult and disgust outside the government. They were given a chance, but they messed it up good and badly.

Who are you talking about here?

Alliance for Aurentina [NSG Senate]

Alliance for Aurentina [NSG Senate]

Who is online