Of the Quendi wrote:So now I will suddenly be my boss's boss?
You'll be my boss. My ministry was given to CMP so I'm going to be the Junior Minister of Interior.
Advertisement

by Jetan » Sat Jul 13, 2013 4:39 am
Of the Quendi wrote:So now I will suddenly be my boss's boss?

by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Jul 13, 2013 4:54 am

by Of the Quendi » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:00 am
Battlion wrote:Of the Quendi wrote:I don't see why introducing taxes targeting the rich are bad. While I don't think it is fair to tax them excessively to place taxes on products they alone can afford is not unreasonable.
Petrol is damaging to the environment and should be used as little as possible, taxes accomplish that. Taxing airlines accomplish the same thing.
Overall I think that it would be much more sensible to introduce taxes like these and then lower the income tax rate instead.
Yes, but we're essentially making driving possible only for the well off with these taxes.
And what about family heirlooms, they could get taxed for those despite never intending to use them
Not always. Propose tax cuts in my country and your approval rating is likely to drop. And I will never understand the fairness of a flat tax rate.Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Well i am only saying what is my opinion on taxes.BTW i live in a country with flat taxes and there are no problems.People always love to pay less taxes

by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:18 am

by Geadland » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:20 am
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Well i am only saying what is my opinion on taxes.BTW i live in a country with flat taxes and there are no problems.People always love to pay less taxes

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:22 am


by Britanno » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:40 am
Geadland wrote:I'm highly tempted to create an overblown right-wing tabloid to counter Ainin's news channel.

by Wolfmanne » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:40 am
Afalia wrote:Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:I am against taxing the rich people bacase why should i that have accomplished much more pay more taxes becase i earn much more money due to my own labor.I see that as proposterus.
I always go with flat taxes that are the same for everyone.
Flat taxes are simply unfair. The vast, vast majority of people won't accept them.

by Battlion » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:44 am

by The Realm of God » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:46 am

by Of the Quendi » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:08 am
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:There are two type's of fair.Depends from what side are you looking at it.
1 side Ordinary people-Why should they pay the same ammout of taxes.It is not fair it is only fair for them to pay more.(Mind it even under fair taxes they pay more)
2side the people who have money-Why should the country punish me becase i earn more money due to my hard work.
it is a duel argument side.I am always not to tax people that did their best and invested in their fortune and education not to be taxed more.
And a question will you refuse an inheritance?

by Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:11 am

by The Realm of God » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:02 am

by Wolfmanne » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:03 am
The Realm of God wrote:Electoral prediction.
At the moment if the vote remains the same when.we move into the second round I can see a perfect deadlock.
As we can see
Britanno (AfA): 55
Yanalia (ProgCo): 45
Malgrave (USLP): 11
TaQud (IND): 1
Holyhex (GRN): 1
The IASM (IND): 1
Now I suspect that the USLP will vote for Yanalia in the second round adding eleven votes. Which brings his total to 56, to this we can add Holyhex's vote bringing the ProgCo vote to 57. I can predict that the IASM and TaQud will vote AfA due to their right wing stance thus bringing our total to 57.
It's going to be close and we need all the people we have to vote.

by Great Nepal » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:04 am
Wolfmanne wrote:I've TGed every party member who hasn't vote and will continue to do so at least once a day before I go to bed. It would be impressive to have 100% turnout.

by Wolfmanne » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:05 am
Great Nepal wrote:Wolfmanne wrote:I've TGed every party member who hasn't vote and will continue to do so at least once a day before I go to bed. It would be impressive to have 100% turnout.
I doubt that is nessecery for first round, we are not going to be able to win in first round and we are definitely getting into second round...
.
by The Realm of God » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:06 am
Wolfmanne wrote:The Realm of God wrote:Electoral prediction.
At the moment if the vote remains the same when.we move into the second round I can see a perfect deadlock.
As we can see
Britanno (AfA): 55
Yanalia (ProgCo): 45
Malgrave (USLP): 11
TaQud (IND): 1
Holyhex (GRN): 1
The IASM (IND): 1
Now I suspect that the USLP will vote for Yanalia in the second round adding eleven votes. Which brings his total to 56, to this we can add Holyhex's vote bringing the ProgCo vote to 57. I can predict that the IASM and TaQud will vote AfA due to their right wing stance thus bringing our total to 57.
It's going to be close and we need all the people we have to vote.
I've TGed every party member who hasn't vote and will continue to do so at least once a day before I go to bed. It would be impressive to have 100% turnout.

by Great Nepal » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:13 am

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:24 am

by Of the Quendi » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:24 am
Great Nepal wrote:Wolfmanne wrote:I've TGed every party member who hasn't vote and will continue to do so at least once a day before I go to bed. It would be impressive to have 100% turnout.
I doubt that is nessecery for first round, we are not going to be able to win in first round and we are definitely getting into second round...

by Byzantium Imperial » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:27 am
The Realm of God wrote:Electoral prediction.
At the moment if the vote remains the same when.we move into the second round I can see a perfect deadlock.
As we can see
Britanno (AfA): 55
Yanalia (ProgCo): 45
Malgrave (USLP): 11
TaQud (IND): 1
Holyhex (GRN): 1
The IASM (IND): 1
Now I suspect that the USLP will vote for Yanalia in the second round adding eleven votes. Which brings his total to 56, to this we can add Holyhex's vote bringing the ProgCo vote to 57. I can predict that the IASM and TaQud will vote AfA due to their right wing stance thus bringing our total to 57.
It's going to be close and we need all the people we have to vote.

by The Realm of God » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:30 am
Byzantium Imperial wrote:The Realm of God wrote:Electoral prediction.
At the moment if the vote remains the same when.we move into the second round I can see a perfect deadlock.
As we can see
Britanno (AfA): 55
Yanalia (ProgCo): 45
Malgrave (USLP): 11
TaQud (IND): 1
Holyhex (GRN): 1
The IASM (IND): 1
Now I suspect that the USLP will vote for Yanalia in the second round adding eleven votes. Which brings his total to 56, to this we can add Holyhex's vote bringing the ProgCo vote to 57. I can predict that the IASM and TaQud will vote AfA due to their right wing stance thus bringing our total to 57.
It's going to be close and we need all the people we have to vote.
Id be willing to bet on USLP abstaining from second round.

by New Zepuha » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:33 am
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by The Realm of God » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:37 am
New Zepuha wrote:The USLP is kinda unpredictable here really. Britanno is up to 56 now.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement