NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

by **TaQud** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:55 pm

Ainin wrote:Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 19
Executive: 21
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

council.

by **Ainin** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:57 pm

Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 21
Executive: 21
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

by **Vedastia** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:42 pm

ERA: EXECUTIVE

by **United Soviet Jason Republic** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:45 pm

Ainin wrote:Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 21
Executive: 21
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

I vote Executive

by **Infinite eternity** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:56 pm

Executive.

by **Gaveo** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:57 pm

Executive.

by **Ainin** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:58 pm

Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 21
Executive: 25
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

by **New Bierstaat** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:24 pm

I vote for the executive option. The council would inevitably end up gridlocked and get very little done.

For the record, I'm going to miss having Wolfmanne as president.

by **Ainin** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:29 pm

Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 21
Executive: 26
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

by **Yanalia** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:41 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:I vote for the executive option. The council would inevitably end up gridlocked and get very little done.

For the record, I'm going to miss having Wolfmanne as president.

Yes, unlike the current system, under which the government has achieved millions of things, right?

by **New Bierstaat** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:48 pm

Yanalia wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:I vote for the executive option. The council would inevitably end up gridlocked and get very little done.

For the record, I'm going to miss having Wolfmanne as president.

Yes, unlike the current system, under which the government has achieved millions of things, right?

Oh no, I totally agree with you. But a gridlocked executive would only exacerbate the problems that already exist under the current deadlocked Senate. It would be like having Karl Marx, Tony Blair, Barack Obama, Saddam Hussein, and Mitt Romney on the same executive and expecting them to diplomatically reach a solution. Minus Marx and Hussein being, well, dead, of course.

by **Free South Califas** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 8:54 pm

New Bierstaat wrote:
Yanalia wrote:
Yes, unlike the current system, under which the government has achieved millions of things, right?

Oh no, I totally agree with you. But a gridlocked executive would only exacerbate the problems that already exist under the current deadlocked Senate. It would be like having Karl Marx, Tony Blair, Barack Obama, Saddam Hussein, and Mitt Romney on the same executive and expecting them to diplomatically reach a solution. Minus Marx and Hussein being, well, dead, of course.

I rather doubt these would be the top five to win votes. I imagine two or three of them would be rather near the center, at least.

by **New Bierstaat** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:06 pm

Free South Califas wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:Oh no, I totally agree with you. But a gridlocked executive would only exacerbate the problems that already exist under the current deadlocked Senate. It would be like having Karl Marx, Tony Blair, Barack Obama, Saddam Hussein, and Mitt Romney on the same executive and expecting them to diplomatically reach a solution. Minus Marx and Hussein being, well, dead, of course.

I rather doubt these would be the top five to win votes. I imagine two or three of them would be rather near the center, at least.

That doesn't mean they'd agree on things.

by **Haelunor** » Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:38 pm

Council.

by **Great Nepal** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 12:13 am

Yanalia wrote:
New Bierstaat wrote:I vote for the executive option. The council would inevitably end up gridlocked and get very little done.

For the record, I'm going to miss having Wolfmanne as president.

Yes, unlike the current system, under which the government has achieved millions of things, right?

we can't do anything because we have gridlocked legislature, so your solution to this is to make gridlocked executive?

by **Polvia** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 12:49 am

I, for one, agree with Great Nepal. (0_o)
I'd be fine if it was a collective head of state, but I think leadership needs to be clear in the government so I favour the Parliamentary system. The issue of a Head of Government and a Head of State in one department, even if it's a council, is also concerning to me.

by **Phing Phong** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:25 am

I wish to register my vote for the council option.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 7:47 am

Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 23
Executive: 26
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

EDIT: The vote ends in about 10 1/2 hours from this post. Vote started at This post.

by **Zurkerx** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:39 am

Executive

by **Shrillland** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:00 am

I vote for an Executive Government.

by **Ainin** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:01 am

Executive Reform Act | Authors: Slazliyka, Great Nepal, Owen Tarniff

Council: 23
Executive: 28
Nay/Status Quo Ante: 6
Abstain: 7

by **Great Nepal** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:02 am

Since this is three way vote, do bills require 51% to pass or just a plurality?

by **The Nihilistic view** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:06 am

Great Nepal wrote:Since this is three way vote, do bills require 51% to pass or just a plurality?

50% +1 to pass.

by **Yanalia** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:06 am

Great Nepal wrote:Since this is three way vote, do bills require 51% to pass or just a plurality?

It's 50%+1. A vote for the council is a nay to the executive, for example, so those get added to the nays on both.

On that note, I'd like to change my vote from abstain to nay on both.

by **Rumostan** » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:15 am

Well that means that from the look of things, nothing will change.

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate]

Who is online