NSG Senate Coffee Shop [NSG Senate]

[Len Hyet]

The Totally Rads.

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

*coughs*
A-hem. That sir, was uncalled for.

[Ceannairceach]

That is slander, sir, and thus against the Ethics Act.

No. That is freedom of speech at it's finest. And I think you have insulted the Objectivist movement and the Semi-Autonomy idea multiple times.

Kindly point to where I did, Senator. And under the Ethics Act, slander is not protected by freedom of speech.

[Arglorand]

Yes.

How many years would you like it to be?

I would prefer two. Three at the most.

[Ziegenhain]

You all are acting like idiots right now if I do say so myself.

Lets get to drafting stuff again.

[Aeken]

No. That is freedom of speech at it's finest. And I think you have insulted the Objectivist movement and the Semi-Autonomy idea multiple times.

Kindly point to where I did, Senator. And under the Ethics Act, slander is not protected by freedom of speech.

Indeed.

[Silent Majority]

The Totally Rads.

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

That's rather amusing coming from a stalinist

[The New Sea Territory]

No. We have no currency. But the USD exists, and so does gold. So, because of the neglect to actaully make a state currency, we will continue to trade in makeshift or foreign currencies.

The Gulch does not exist yet, nor is its autonomy legitimate if it were real yet. If your bill passes, then it is legitimate.

The Gulch is a place, so it does exist. it's autonomy is the question. We are waiting for the bill to pass.

[Arglorand]

The Totally Rads.

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

You Stalinists and your projection.

[CTALNH]

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

That is slander, sir, and thus against the Ethics Act.

No?

I asked a question I didn't swear or slander anyone.

[The New Sea Territory]

No. That is freedom of speech at it's finest. And I think you have insulted the Objectivist movement and the Semi-Autonomy idea multiple times.

Kindly point to where I did, Senator. And under the Ethics Act, slander is not protected by freedom of speech.

So it's only ok for you to slander me?

Oh, wait. Ceanna has the "Rule of Law" behind him!

[Aeken]

The Gulch does not exist yet, nor is its autonomy legitimate if it were real yet. If your bill passes, then it is legitimate.

The Gulch is a place, so it does exist. it's autonomy is the question. We are waiting for the bill to pass.

There are no national subdivisions, or a place of geography yet that is official. It does not exist.

[CTALNH]

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

You Stalinists and your projection.

Yes what?

And we prefer to be called marxists leninists.

[Ceannairceach]

That is slander, sir, and thus against the Ethics Act.

No?

I asked a question I didn't swear or slander anyone.

You disparaged myself and the TR by rhetorically questioning our motives and persons. It was slander.

[Britcan]

Kindly point to where I did, Senator. And under the Ethics Act, slander is not protected by freedom of speech.

So it's only ok for you to slander me?

Oh, wait. Ceanna has the "Rule of Law" behind him!

Please point out where he slandered you.

[CTALNH]

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

That's rather amusing coming from a stalinist

Hey we invented the term....

And you don't even know what it means...

I bet 5 USD.

[Aquitayne]

Wow, haven't tagged myself here yet. Anyway, hello! What's we arguin' about todeh?

[Ceannairceach]

Kindly point to where I did, Senator. And under the Ethics Act, slander is not protected by freedom of speech.

So it's only ok for you to slander me?

Oh, wait. Ceanna has the "Rule of Law" behind him!

Please, point to my slander and I will gladly seek punishment as per senate rules. Don't change the subject.

[Ceannairceach]

Wow, haven't tagged myself here yet. Anyway, hello! What's we arguin' about todeh?

The Objectivists seek to receive special treatment by being considered semi-autonomous while still having full say in senate proceedings.

[Nationalist Eminral Republic]

How many years would you like it to be?

I would prefer two. Three at the most.

I'll make it 3 then, thanks for your comment.

[The New Sea Territory]

So it's only ok for you to slander me?

Oh, wait. Ceanna has the "Rule of Law" behind him!

Please, point to my slander and I will gladly seek punishment as per senate rules. Don't change the subject.

I said this way back, about ten posts ago. You changed the subject.

But I will continue to use my freedom of speech, Ethics Act or not. I will simply not slander you in this forum.

[CTALNH]

Is it me or the totally rad party is full of social fascists?

*coughs*
A-hem. That sir, was uncalled for.

Half of you people don't even know what this term means.

[Ceannairceach]

Please, point to my slander and I will gladly seek punishment as per senate rules. Don't change the subject.

I said this way back, about ten posts ago. You changed the subject.

But I will continue to use my freedom of speech, Ethics Act or not. I will simply not slander you in this forum.

Alright, if you have no evidence, then kindly, as they say where I am from, shut the fuck up. I will not stand for false accusations.

[The New Sea Territory]

Wow, haven't tagged myself here yet. Anyway, hello! What's we arguin' about todeh?

The Objectivists seek to receive special treatment by being considered semi-autonomous while still having full say in senate proceedings.

And that happens in real life. Look at the Russian Federation. Look at every state in America.

[CTALNH]

No?

I asked a question I didn't swear or slander anyone.

You disparaged myself and the TR by rhetorically questioning our motives and persons. It was slander.

Like the people in TR have done many times by asking us why we need our paramilitary?

[The New Sea Territory]

I said this way back, about ten posts ago. You changed the subject.

But I will continue to use my freedom of speech, Ethics Act or not. I will simply not slander you in this forum.

Alright, if you have no evidence, then kindly, as they say where I am from, shut the fuck up. I will not stand for false accusations.

And this is not slander? This is not against your Ethics Act?

So, it only applies when the Totally Rad party is targeted. Tyranny by majority. The largets party simply attacks it's smaller partners.