Advertisement

by Geilinor » Tue May 07, 2013 6:40 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 6:40 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:
Remove the remaining 10% and the Internal Security Act might not apply to your party.

by Finium » Tue May 07, 2013 6:40 pm
Unicario wrote:Finium wrote:No one fears radical parties, but radical parties seem to fear us, which makes us afraid for what they might do in that stupor of fear.
And yet it seems they're not afraid, they don't want a rebellion as much as you don't, but they want to continue using their paramilitaries as ceremonial pieces, and to guard their compounds, etcetera and so forth.
What's the big deal if there is a compromise on the table? It's not as if we're going to go back on that.

by Greater Pokarnia » Tue May 07, 2013 6:40 pm

by Unicario » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Finium wrote:Unicario wrote:And yet it seems they're not afraid, they don't want a rebellion as much as you don't, but they want to continue using their paramilitaries as ceremonial pieces, and to guard their compounds, etcetera and so forth.
What's the big deal if there is a compromise on the table? It's not as if we're going to go back on that.
If they weren't afraid then why have I been told that the only reason that these paramilitaries exist in is preparation for some future incident?

by Zweite Alaje » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm

by Ceannairceach » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Unicario wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:We are not building Rome, Senator. We are attempting to have a civil government free from the threats of partisan violence. This shouldn't be a topic of debate; Every senator here, from every party, should invest their trust in the democratic system, not in the force of arms.
Senator Cean, work with me here. We're trying to find a compromise to step towards what you and your comrades are pushing for. Give faith in the NIFP's morality. This debate does nothing for my effort to convince the party to abandon paramilitaries soon.
Come on, I'm trying.

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Hathradic States wrote:We are nationalist. Do you think we want our nation destroyed? We love our nation, and only wish its strength. (and freedom from leftist tyrants, but you can't have everything[/joke])
Then you will disband your paramilitary and throw your support behind the government. It is only logical.

by Unicario » Tue May 07, 2013 6:42 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Unicario wrote:
Senator Cean, work with me here. We're trying to find a compromise to step towards what you and your comrades are pushing for. Give faith in the NIFP's morality. This debate does nothing for my effort to convince the party to abandon paramilitaries soon.
Come on, I'm trying.
No. The NIFP lost its credibility as a faction for the benefit of the nation when it established a paramilitary force. Democracy rules, not guns.

by The Realm of God » Tue May 07, 2013 6:43 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:The Republic of Lanos wrote:I would ask that you do the same, senator.
I'm not being melodramatic. I'm not the one running around bitching about non-existent party disciplinary actions or being called a terrorist.Unicario wrote:Chairman Hath has agreed to cut his paramilitary down 90%. That's a damn lot more than you would get otherwise.
Remove the remaining 10% and the Internal Security Act might not apply to your party.

by Costa Alegria » Tue May 07, 2013 6:43 pm
Hathradic States wrote:Step down from the Senate and I might consider it.

by Ceannairceach » Tue May 07, 2013 6:43 pm

by Mishmahig » Tue May 07, 2013 6:44 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Unicario wrote:
Senator Cean, work with me here. We're trying to find a compromise to step towards what you and your comrades are pushing for. Give faith in the NIFP's morality. This debate does nothing for my effort to convince the party to abandon paramilitaries soon.
Come on, I'm trying.
No. The NIFP lost its credibility as a faction for the benefit of the nation when it established a paramilitary force. Democracy rules, not guns.

by Unicario » Tue May 07, 2013 6:44 pm

by Unicario » Tue May 07, 2013 6:44 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Hathradic States wrote:Not until we know the government will support us, and not turn its jackals on our constituents.
You expect favoritism in exchange for peace? You do not seem to be a nationalist, sir, but rather a opportunist who seeks to weaken the government to serve his own interests.
The government supports you so far that it gives you a voice equal to everyone else in the Senate. Asking for anything more than that is immoral and thief-like.

by Zweite Alaje » Tue May 07, 2013 6:44 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Unicario wrote:
Senator Cean, work with me here. We're trying to find a compromise to step towards what you and your comrades are pushing for. Give faith in the NIFP's morality. This debate does nothing for my effort to convince the party to abandon paramilitaries soon.
Come on, I'm trying.
No. The NIFP lost its credibility as a faction for the benefit of the nation when it established a paramilitary force. Democracy rules, not guns.

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 6:45 pm

by Geilinor » Tue May 07, 2013 6:45 pm

by Costa Alegria » Tue May 07, 2013 6:46 pm
The Realm of God wrote:Cool off the rhetoric and see if we can agree to the 90% reduction.

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 6:46 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Hathradic States wrote:Not until we know the government will support us, and not turn its jackals on our constituents.
You expect favoritism in exchange for peace? You do not seem to be a nationalist, sir, but rather a opportunist who seeks to weaken the government to serve his own interests.
The government supports you so far that it gives you a voice equal to everyone else in the Senate. Asking for anything more than that is immoral and thief-like.

by The Republic of Lanos » Tue May 07, 2013 6:46 pm

by Shrillland » Tue May 07, 2013 6:48 pm
Unicario wrote:Finium wrote:I suppose I struggle to see the threat to safety, but I regress, hopefully diplomacy can prevail.
Quite. The paramilitaries do not immediately mean anti-democracy. But I'm trying to understand both points of view, okay? It's kind of hard to listen to people when they're mad and flipping tables over this shit.

by Unicario » Tue May 07, 2013 6:48 pm
Shrillland wrote:Unicario wrote:
Quite. The paramilitaries do not immediately mean anti-democracy. But I'm trying to understand both points of view, okay? It's kind of hard to listen to people when they're mad and flipping tables over this shit.
I respect the honourable senator is trying to take the moderate position, but her party is not the only one with Paramilitaries. Suppose the other parties try to use theirs.

by Geilinor » Tue May 07, 2013 6:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement