Did I ask you?
Advertisement

by Kamchastkia » Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:25 pm

by New Zepuha » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:08 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

by Britanno » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:31 pm

by Yanalia » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:32 pm
Britanno wrote:A senator just told me that Aurentina is in the EU, have I missed out on that fact?
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

by Wolfmanne » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:32 pm
Britanno wrote:A senator just told me that Aurentina is in the EU, have I missed out on that fact?

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:33 pm
Britanno wrote:A senator just told me that Aurentina is in the EU, have I missed out on that fact?
by Ainin » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:33 pm
Britanno wrote:A senator just told me that Aurentina is in the EU, have I missed out on that fact?

by Rumostan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:35 pm


by Rumostan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:40 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:41 pm

by Rumostan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:42 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:44 pm

by Britanno » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:47 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:49 pm
Britanno wrote:Thank god we aren't in the EU. Saying that, if we were then I would get to play a part in the eurosceptic movement and would get to be like my favourite politician, Nigel Farage.


by Malgrave » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:53 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:On another note, senators do not be influence by senator Malgrave on the issues of the UK and its austerity measures. He does not it seems understand the process of transforming the economy that is going on.

Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

by Rumostan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:55 pm
Malgrave wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:On another note, senators do not be influence by senator Malgrave on the issues of the UK and its austerity measures. He does not it seems understand the process of transforming the economy that is going on.
Considering I currently live in the UK and can see the effect of these austerity measures and I provided actual sources compared to people who provided none? Sounds legit.

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:56 pm
Malgrave wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:On another note, senators do not be influence by senator Malgrave on the issues of the UK and its austerity measures. He does not it seems understand the process of transforming the economy that is going on.
Considering I currently live in the UK and can see the effect of these austerity measures and I provided actual sources compared to people who provided none? Sounds legit.

by Britanno » Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:58 pm
Malgrave wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:On another note, senators do not be influence by senator Malgrave on the issues of the UK and its austerity measures. He does not it seems understand the process of transforming the economy that is going on.
Considering I currently live in the UK and can see the effect of these austerity measures and I provided actual sources compared to people who provided none? Sounds legit.

by Phing Phong » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:07 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Malgrave wrote:
Considering I currently live in the UK and can see the effect of these austerity measures and I provided actual sources compared to people who provided none? Sounds legit.
You fail to mention how the main aim right now is to re-balance the economy, something that is succeeding and not outright economic growth. Thus your argument is intellectually dishonest.

by Malgrave » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:09 pm
Britanno wrote:Malgrave wrote:
Considering I currently live in the UK and can see the effect of these austerity measures and I provided actual sources compared to people who provided none? Sounds legit.
I could provide some links to websites of my own. There are plenty of other biased websites that side with my argument. I would use them but I am on a shitting old iPod that goes about as fast as a snail.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

by Yanalia » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:09 pm
Malgrave wrote:Britanno wrote:
I could provide some links to websites of my own. There are plenty of other biased websites that side with my argument. I would use them but I am on a shitting old iPod that goes about as fast as a snail.
So the Chief Economist for the Financial Times, CNN, Bloomberg, the BBC (quoting the IMF) and a book researching the dangers of austerity are all bias sources?
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:16 pm
Phing Phong wrote:For the record, I oppose Aurentina joining the EU—there's no point swapping Westminster for Brussels.The Nihilistic view wrote:
You fail to mention how the main aim right now is to re-balance the economy, something that is succeeding and not outright economic growth. Thus your argument is intellectually dishonest.
I thought the Chancellor told us a few years ago that our annual GDP growth rate should be 6% at this point in his austerity plans. We'd be lucky to get 0.6% given the current climate. The cuts are in the wrong areas and aren't enough to anywhere near balance the budget, let alone reduce the deficit.

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:17 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:29 pm
Yanalia wrote:Can I get some sponsors for this act? I want to move it up to the currently debated omnibus.Second Amendment to the Republican
Executive Act
Drafted by: Yanalia [RG]
Sponsors: Maklohi Vai [LD], Oneracon [RG], The Nihilistic View [LD]
1. The Deputy Prime Minister shall be appointed by the Prime Minister and may perform the duties of the Prime Minister in case of resignation or a physical inability to complete duties on the part of the Prime Minister.
2. Clause 1-A of the REA is hereby struck out and rendered null and void. It shall be replaced with the following clause. "The President shall be the Head of State, elected by the Senate in a two-round system, in which the top two candidates from the first round shall be voted on, unless one candidate attains a majority of 50%+1 of the total votes in the first round, upon which that candidate assumes the Presidency without a second round of voting."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement