Advertisement

by Potenco » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:07 am

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:10 am
Potenco wrote:I Sponsor. I wish I could sponsor twice
We could add another clause that would add a minimum ten year sentence if one is convicted of participating in a criminal enterprise
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?

by Rumostan » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:10 am
by Ainin » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:10 am

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:11 am
Rumostan wrote:I just want to point out that the Mafia only did things for four days and seem to have stopped their activities.
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?

by Potenco » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:12 am

by Rumostan » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:12 am

by Potenco » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:13 am

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:14 am
Ainin wrote:Why set punishments when the Judicial Act sets...
1a. A contravention is defined as the least severe form of a crime, which is crime that lacks the severity to trialed against a panel of judges in it's court of first instance. Examples include driving offenses and public disorder. A perpetrator of a contravention may not receive a prison sentence. A maximum fine of £3,000 may be given; it is a maximum fine of £45,000 against corporations.
1b. A delict is defined as a crime that is severe enough to have it's case be trialed before a panel of judges, but not severe enough to warrant the same or similar punishment as a felony. Examples include aggravated assault and battery or wilful neglect of a child. A perpetrator of a delict may receive a prison sentence at or under 10 years and my be fined up to £15,000; it is a maximum fine of £1,000,000 against corporations.
1c. A felony is defined as the most serious kind of crime that could of resulted or has caused the death of an individual or a group, or has otherwise caused severe psychological or physical damage. Examples include murder, rape or arson. A felony shall be trialed before a panel of judges and shall be subject to the most severe forms of punishment. A perpetrator of a felony is mandated to receive a prison sentence at or over 10 years (depending on the crime, the minimum could be more) and may be up to £1,000,000; it is a maximum fine of £10,000,000 against corporations.
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?
by Ainin » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:15 am
Kalmath wrote:Ainin wrote:Why set punishments when the Judicial Act sets...
1a. A contravention is defined as the least severe form of a crime, which is crime that lacks the severity to trialed against a panel of judges in it's court of first instance. Examples include driving offenses and public disorder. A perpetrator of a contravention may not receive a prison sentence. A maximum fine of £3,000 may be given; it is a maximum fine of £45,000 against corporations.
1b. A delict is defined as a crime that is severe enough to have it's case be trialed before a panel of judges, but not severe enough to warrant the same or similar punishment as a felony. Examples include aggravated assault and battery or wilful neglect of a child. A perpetrator of a delict may receive a prison sentence at or under 10 years and my be fined up to £15,000; it is a maximum fine of £1,000,000 against corporations.
1c. A felony is defined as the most serious kind of crime that could of resulted or has caused the death of an individual or a group, or has otherwise caused severe psychological or physical damage. Examples include murder, rape or arson. A felony shall be trialed before a panel of judges and shall be subject to the most severe forms of punishment. A perpetrator of a felony is mandated to receive a prison sentence at or over 10 years (depending on the crime, the minimum could be more) and may be up to £1,000,000; it is a maximum fine of £10,000,000 against corporations.
I felt as though the Judicial Act was not targeted enough especially against organized crime.

by Potenco » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:15 am
Ainin wrote:Why set punishments when the Judicial Act sets...
1a. A contravention is defined as the least severe form of a crime, which is crime that lacks the severity to trialed against a panel of judges in it's court of first instance. Examples include driving offenses and public disorder. A perpetrator of a contravention may not receive a prison sentence. A maximum fine of £3,000 may be given; it is a maximum fine of £45,000 against corporations.
1b. A delict is defined as a crime that is severe enough to have it's case be trialed before a panel of judges, but not severe enough to warrant the same or similar punishment as a felony. Examples include aggravated assault and battery or wilful neglect of a child. A perpetrator of a delict may receive a prison sentence at or under 10 years and my be fined up to £15,000; it is a maximum fine of £1,000,000 against corporations.
1c. A felony is defined as the most serious kind of crime that could of resulted or has caused the death of an individual or a group, or has otherwise caused severe psychological or physical damage. Examples include murder, rape or arson. A felony shall be trialed before a panel of judges and shall be subject to the most severe forms of punishment. A perpetrator of a felony is mandated to receive a prison sentence at or over 10 years (depending on the crime, the minimum could be more) and may be up to £1,000,000; it is a maximum fine of £10,000,000 against corporations.
by Ainin » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:17 am
Potenco wrote:Ainin wrote:Why set punishments when the Judicial Act sets...
1a. A contravention is defined as the least severe form of a crime, which is crime that lacks the severity to trialed against a panel of judges in it's court of first instance. Examples include driving offenses and public disorder. A perpetrator of a contravention may not receive a prison sentence. A maximum fine of £3,000 may be given; it is a maximum fine of £45,000 against corporations.
1b. A delict is defined as a crime that is severe enough to have it's case be trialed before a panel of judges, but not severe enough to warrant the same or similar punishment as a felony. Examples include aggravated assault and battery or wilful neglect of a child. A perpetrator of a delict may receive a prison sentence at or under 10 years and my be fined up to £15,000; it is a maximum fine of £1,000,000 against corporations.
1c. A felony is defined as the most serious kind of crime that could of resulted or has caused the death of an individual or a group, or has otherwise caused severe psychological or physical damage. Examples include murder, rape or arson. A felony shall be trialed before a panel of judges and shall be subject to the most severe forms of punishment. A perpetrator of a felony is mandated to receive a prison sentence at or over 10 years (depending on the crime, the minimum could be more) and may be up to £1,000,000; it is a maximum fine of £10,000,000 against corporations.
Honestly, has the Judicial Act worked against organized crime as it is now? No, we need to do as much as we can to stop these people as we can.

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:18 am
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?
by Ainin » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:21 am

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:23 am
Ainin wrote:Example:
. (A) Any person part of a Criminal Enterprise who has committed any two of the crimes in (§ II -2- A) within a eleven year period may be charged with racketeering. Any person(s) found guilty of Racketeering may face up to twenty five years in prison, fined up to 250,000 NSD and will forfeit all ill-gotten gains. (B) Those found guilty of Racketeering may be subject to civil suits by those who have been harmed by the convicted.
changes to...
. (A) Any person part of a Criminal Enterprise who has committed any two of the crimes in (§ II -2- A) within a eleven year period may be charged with racketeering. Any person(s) found guilty of Racketeering mayface up to twenty five years in prison, fined up to 250,000 NSDbe charged with a felony and will forfeit all ill-gotten gains. (B) Those found guilty of Racketeering may be subject to civil suits by those who have been harmed by the convicted.
The Blakewell Act
Author: Kalmath
Urgency: Urgent
Sponsors: Potenco
DECLARING that Organized Crime in Aurentina has reached unprecedented levels.
SHOCKED at the blatant murder of Mr. Blakewell.
RECOMMENDS these measures to curb and control Criminal Enterprises.
§ I - Scope
1. (A) Any person part of a Criminal Enterprise who has committed any two of the crimes in (§ II -2- A) within a eleven year period may be charged with racketeering. Any person(s) found guilty of Racketeering may be charged with a felony and will forfeit all ill-gotten gains. (B) Those found guilty of Racketeering may be subject to civil suits by those who have been harmed by the convicted.
2. (A) If the Ministry of Justice chooses to indict a person on racketeering charges the defendants assets can be temporarily frozen until the either he is found innocent of racketeering or the racketeering charge is dropped.
3. (A) If one member of a criminal enterprise is indicted on racketeering charges under this act, the Ministry of Justice may also indict all members of said criminal enterprise on said charges. (B) If found guilty all indicted shall be convicted of racketeering.
4. (A) The Ministry of Justice may indict a person as the head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise, and therefore, if convicted of racketeering face up to life in prison without the possibility of parole, a fine of at least 2 million NSD, seizure of ALL assets, and a felony charge.
§ II - Criminal Organizations and Crimes
1. (A) Criminal Enterprise: is a group of individuals with an identified hierarchy, or comparable structure, engaged in criminal activity.
2. (A) Murder, protection, kidnapping, extortion, robbery (of any means), arson, bribery, possession of stolen property, fraud, identity theft, theft, counterfeiting, embezzlement, obstruction of justice, slavery, money laundering, blackmail, smuggling, assisting/aiding/embedding illegal aliens, securities fraud, insurance fraud, and acts of terrorism.
3. (A) Head of a Continuing Criminal Enterprise: an organizer, manager, or supervisor of the continuing operation and have obtained substantial income or resources from any of the crimes found it (§ II -2- A).
Hereby passes the Blakewell Act.
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?

by CTALNH » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:21 am
Armed Police Act
Drafted by:CTALNH
OBSERVING The recent rise of organised crime and violent crime.
REALIZING That the police should be ready to handle situations like this 24/7.
MANDATES That every police officer should carry a fully automatic weapon and bulletproof vests.
Hereby passes the Armed Police Act.
by Ainin » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:25 am
CTALNH wrote:Armed Police Act
Drafted by:CTALNH
OBSERVING The recent rise of organised crime and violent crime.
REALIZING That the police should be ready to handle situations like this 24/7.
MANDATES That every policeman should carry a fully automatic weapon and bulletproof vests.
Hereby passes the Armed Police Act.
Ideas?

by CTALNH » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:26 am
Ainin wrote:CTALNH wrote:Armed Police Act
Drafted by:CTALNH
OBSERVING The recent rise of organised crime and violent crime.
REALIZING That the police should be ready to handle situations like this 24/7.
MANDATES That every policeman should carry a fully automatic weapon and bulletproof vests.
Hereby passes the Armed Police Act.
Ideas?
Against. Make love, not war. Yolo swag.

by Aurentine Constabularies » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:29 am

by Rumostan » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:35 am
CTALNH wrote:Armed Police Act
Drafted by:CTALNH
OBSERVING The recent rise of organised crime and violent crime.
REALIZING That the police should be ready to handle situations like this 24/7.
MANDATES That every policeman should carry a fully automatic weapon and bulletproof vests.
Hereby passes the Armed Police Act.
Ideas?

by Kalmath » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:37 am
CTALNH wrote:Sorry for being me can we still be comrades?

by CTALNH » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:37 am
Rumostan wrote:CTALNH wrote:Armed Police Act
Drafted by:CTALNH
OBSERVING The recent rise of organised crime and violent crime.
REALIZING That the police should be ready to handle situations like this 24/7.
MANDATES That every policeman should carry a fully automatic weapon and bulletproof vests.
Hereby passes the Armed Police Act.
Ideas?
Against, we are not a totalitarian nation which gives the police dangerous weapons.


by CTALNH » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:38 am
Kalmath wrote:If you want to stop the Mafia Support the Blakewell Act, it gives the police the power to take down entire criminal enterprises in case. It is modeled from the the USA's RICO Act.

by Rumostan » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:38 am

by Britanno » Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:39 am
Kalmath wrote:If you want to stop the Mafia Support the Blakewell Act, it gives the police the power to take down entire criminal enterprises in case. It is modeled from the the USA's RICO Act.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement