As I said for the billionth time, you can directly employ your security officers. Don't need a private security company.
Advertisement
by Wolfmanne » Thu May 30, 2013 7:00 pm
by The Realm of God » Thu May 30, 2013 7:02 pm
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 7:03 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 7:14 pm
by Fortunagen » Thu May 30, 2013 7:35 pm
Mistelemr wrote:With how many shootings that happen almost daily now, I find it hard to care.
Sure I hate myself for it, but fuck it, we invited this. It's sad, but at some point you just stop caring. People can scream and cry but nothing will ever get done about it. When was it last that a shooting incident like this (or any other) actually made people legitimately search for answers or try a new approach? None that I can think of, It's been the same people, shouting the same expletives with the same people dying.
I hear they have good internet over in Scandinavia.
by Costa Alegria » Thu May 30, 2013 7:42 pm
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 7:45 pm
by Grenartia » Thu May 30, 2013 8:20 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:Just so all interested parties know, the government may be willing to purchase the vehicles off any political parties currently disbanding their paramilitaries.
Belmaria wrote:A new group, the Coalition for Economic Responsibility, has created a website in support of the Economic Responsibility Act!
http://nsg-era.webs.com/
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 8:31 pm
Grenartia wrote:Belmaria wrote:The private security force of the Objectivists is for party security purposes, not for political intimidation purposes. Just to let you know.
That's what the Fascists and Stalinists said, too. But they lied. I'm not saying your party is lying as well, but given this nation's history with "private security forces" for political parties, one cannot blame us for needing to pass the ISA.Costa Alegria wrote:Just so all interested parties know, the government may be willing to purchase the vehicles off any political parties currently disbanding their paramilitaries.
Indeed. I would also imagine we would be highly interested in the NIFP's 1500mm cannon, along with all associated resources and materials.Belmaria wrote:A new group, the Coalition for Economic Responsibility, has created a website in support of the Economic Responsibility Act!
http://nsg-era.webs.com/
Is an entire website for a bill really NEEDED?
by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 8:58 pm
Belmaria wrote:Grenartia wrote:
That's what the Fascists and Stalinists said, too. But they lied. I'm not saying your party is lying as well, but given this nation's history with "private security forces" for political parties, one cannot blame us for needing to pass the ISA.
Indeed. I would also imagine we would be highly interested in the NIFP's 1500mm cannon, along with all associated resources and materials.
Is an entire website for a bill really NEEDED?
Yes, as the leftists are going to use everything in their power to stop this bill. So we need to be ready to push back with as much power as possible.
by The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:02 pm
Grenartia wrote:Belmaria wrote:The private security force of the Objectivists is for party security purposes, not for political intimidation purposes. Just to let you know.
That's what the Fascists and Stalinists said, too. But they lied. I'm not saying your party is lying as well, but given this nation's history with "private security forces" for political parties, one cannot blame us for needing to pass the ISA.Costa Alegria wrote:Just so all interested parties know, the government may be willing to purchase the vehicles off any political parties currently disbanding their paramilitaries.
Indeed. I would also imagine we would be highly interested in the NIFP's 1500mm cannon, along with all associated resources and materials.Belmaria wrote:A new group, the Coalition for Economic Responsibility, has created a website in support of the Economic Responsibility Act!
http://nsg-era.webs.com/
Is an entire website for a bill really NEEDED?
by Grenartia » Thu May 30, 2013 9:07 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Grenartia wrote:
That's what the Fascists and Stalinists said, too. But they lied. I'm not saying your party is lying as well, but given this nation's history with "private security forces" for political parties, one cannot blame us for needing to pass the ISA.
Indeed. I would also imagine we would be highly interested in the NIFP's 1500mm cannon, along with all associated resources and materials.
Is an entire website for a bill really NEEDED?
Lied?
Again Cite ONE, Just one occasiona where a member of the NIFP's Paramilitary used their authority and equipment for anything other then defense of the Party and it's interests.
And good luck i am head of the project and i don't feel like sharing.
1500mm railcannon and it's related materials are well outside the bounds of this island.
They were moved ages ago.
by Hathradic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:13 pm
Grenartia wrote:
So you admit that you don't have the best interests of the nation at hand? If you did, you'd at least be open to the thought of negotiating transferring control of the project to the Auretine military.
by Hathradic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:13 pm
Grenartia wrote:
There are too many of you and the Stalinists fighting each other in the streets to list.
by The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:14 pm
Grenartia wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
Lied?
Again Cite ONE, Just one occasiona where a member of the NIFP's Paramilitary used their authority and equipment for anything other then defense of the Party and it's interests.
And good luck i am head of the project and i don't feel like sharing.
1500mm railcannon and it's related materials are well outside the bounds of this island.
They were moved ages ago.
There are too many of you and the Stalinists fighting each other in the streets to list.
So you admit that you don't have the best interests of the nation at hand? If you did, you'd at least be open to the thought of negotiating transferring control of the project to the Auretine military.
by Costa Alegria » Thu May 30, 2013 9:14 pm
Hathradic States wrote:We have no interest in helping a regime which has stabbed our Party in the back.
by Hathradic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:15 pm
by Quirina » Thu May 30, 2013 9:18 pm
by Costa Alegria » Thu May 30, 2013 9:19 pm
Hathradic States wrote:Weakening us is betrayal of the Party, whether with forced agreement or not.
by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 9:19 pm
Quirina wrote:*Currently looking at the vast list of ALL Senators in NSG Senate, both old and new threads*
Shit's got a large chamber of politicians.
*Turns to the list of ALL political parties then and now*
You people ain't got no chance of being people-loving fellas.
by Hathradic States » Thu May 30, 2013 9:20 pm
by Costa Alegria » Thu May 30, 2013 9:22 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 9:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement